- Jul 7, 2009
- 1,228
- 1,715
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Liverpool; Brisbane Roar
Given we are after a key back, what do yous think of Rory Thompson from GCS in a witts deal?
A promising young KPP !
How about Steven May?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Given we are after a key back, what do yous think of Rory Thompson from GCS in a witts deal?
A promising young KPP !
Maybe Williams out Maynard to back pocket
Dal Santo to HBF to direct and provide classy kicking to wells pendles treloar sides etc for that next kick onto chest of leading Moore!
Lol whatever dude. You have an issue.. its called selective hearing.
clever but I am not sure if I would take all of them.
How about Steven May?
Watched the NEAFL grand final...very tight game with GWS just getting over the line in the end. WHE had a very good game. His tackling was the feature for me, especially in that last quarter when things were tight. Finlayson's versatility would be a big asset to any side. Comfortable as a key back, mid and even a bit of forward. Great utility. Still not sold on Stewart. Kicked two fortuitous goals but offered little else. Barrett is a good little player who knocks up getting the pill. Flynn was one I'd never heard of before but is a handy tall and had a great game. Would like us to target WHE and Finlayson. Might be a good trade for Witts...
I reckon WHE is coming he isnt going to say just yet when he is a possibility to replace stevie j and play in finals, all his family would of been drilled about what to say if asked i.e he's contracted i feel thats an instucted answer to that question not a genuine family responseNot sure about that being the case. Hear he is happy at GWS and more than happy to remain at Spotless.
Witts gone for sure, GC will be his new home.
Lol wayyyyyyyyyyyy unders
Agree with schnarberg at halfback i just felt the inclusion of NDS would take away the pressure of expectation on schranberg allowing him to settle into the role rather than being thrust into the job! we would get NDS for nothing and use his experience down back.Schnarberg has to play off the half back line has amazing skills, intercepts marks and reads the play very well. Williams is terrible just butchers the ball, and so does Nathan Brown, i wouldnt have him in my best 22 either, id be looking for KPD that can take Brown place, maybe that might be Keefe but im hoping we can secure another one in the trade, Marchback would be ideal.
Not sure if it's been answered but you can trade rookies, but they must go onto the new teams senior listAccording to some other posts buried in this thread, it seems like no. Rookies apparently can be traded now. Maybe someone else can confirm though.
It was horrendous. Given it occurred when we were hitting our straps in the second half of the year, when we had form, were still a possibility for finals, and North had descended into rubbish, I rank it as one of the worse losses of the year. And at that hellhole, Etihad. Just awful.
Funny thing is you have a habit of getting personal with your responses. You don't look at posts objectively. Seriously its a topic everyone has differing views on.. we are debating it.. not getting personal.. which you are! I know your type. You just seem to get either a rise out of it.. or just a stubborn old bloke without an education.Selective Hearing?
Very funny - I thinks it more about ego on your part.
But I'll let others be the judge.
A player like NDS down there, that doesn't happen, we win the game, also schnarberg there, doesn't happen eitherNot sure if it's been answered but you can trade rookies, but they must go onto the new teams senior list
7/8 goals to NM from D50 turnovers. Howe had 2 shockers and Maynard 1 from the kick outs. Tough to win when you turn it over so badly, in the worst possible place on the field.
Still not convinced he is the messiah and I should take everything he supposedly has stated as gospel.
Reckon blind Freddie could have done his job at GWS
Langdon is still best 22 IMO
Funny thing is you have a habit of getting personal with your responses. You don't look at posts objectively. Seriously its a topic everyone has differing views on.. we are debating it.. not getting personal.. which you are! I know your type. You just seem to get either a rise out of it.. or just a stubborn old bloke without an education.
You say I've got an ego.. I'm thinking you lack social skills buddy.
No they aren't.Langdons future is for discussion this time next year. As indeed Sinclair and Ramsay and possibly scharenburg.
For the time being they are all keepers and may the best man/men win a spot in the starting 22
The back six we played last game was:
Maynard-Brown-Williams
Howe-Marsh-Smith
with Goldsack playing that day as well.
My preference for Round 1 is:
Maynard-Marsh-Ramsay
Howe-Reid-Sinclair
I'd like Scharenberg to own a spot before too long, not sure for who, and I think with Howe as a high-class intercept mark and spoiler, we don't need to rely so much on Marsh being caught out one on one (thinking the Eagles model in 2015 when they were undersized, they made it a strength that would suit us).
No Dal Santo, no Langdon, no Williams, no Brown. But I'm happy to have depth all the same.
It looks good but still think there needs to be someone with leadership characteristics and experience not to mention foot skills apart from Reid there isnt any other reliable kickers and D half turnovers probably cost most our games this yearThe back six we played last game was:
Maynard-Brown-Williams
Howe-Marsh-Smith
with Goldsack playing that day as well.
My preference for Round 1 is:
Maynard-Marsh-Ramsay
Howe-Reid-Sinclair
I'd like Scharenberg to own a spot before too long, not sure for who, and I think with Howe as a high-class intercept mark and spoiler, we don't need to rely so much on Marsh being caught out one on one (thinking the Eagles model in 2015 when they were undersized, they made it a strength that would suit us).
No Dal Santo, no Langdon, no Williams, no Brown. But I'm happy to have depth all the same.
No they aren't.
Let others be the judge.. what are you here trying to win sides are ya.. id rather put my milSelective Hearing?
Very funny - I thinks it more about ego on your part.
But I'll let others be the judge.
Seriously can't bo bothered with your replies. You want to argue the topic I'm all for that.. you want to say in your very first response to my post for the day.. ' i suggest you reconsider what you wrote if you truly believe what you wrote' along those lines.. go harass your neighbours mate.. I'm not an idiot.You've definitely got an ego - and I have not made any personal attacks. You know if that was the case I would have been given a warning or banned.
As to educational level, I think I have you well and truely covered.
As to age - who knows.