Opinion Commentary & Media V

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
kangatime said:
You haven't show me anywhere that Melbourne or Richmond have published their plan. They've announced the outcomes they are striving from but that's not publishing the plan. You have no idea what the measurable KPIs were within the plan. They just announced the desire to be successful to appease the stupidity of their members.
Click to expand...
I'd say playing 3 finals in X years is a pretty measurable KPI. I can't remember the specifics and I'm not gonna Google it for you but it pretty clearly had milestone measures.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Themanbun said:
I'd say playing 3 finals in X years is a pretty measurable KPI. I can't remember the specifics and I'm not gonna Google it for you but it pretty clearly had milestone measures.
Click to expand...
Thats not the plan. The plan is the road map how to get there. Like I said, announcing those sort of "milestones" is to appease the stupidly of their members. Please please please, read that last sentence again and again until it sinks in.
 
But as surface level as the clip was it’s not wrong we are worryingly poor at the moment.
 
kangatime said:
Thats not the plan. The plan is the road map how to get there. Like I said, announcing those sort of "milestones" is to appease the stupidly of their members. Please please please, read that last sentence again and again until it sinks in.
Click to expand...
Yes, at this stage our progress unfortunately can only really be measured qualitatively for the most part.

It’s hard to measure
 
Themanbun said:
Qualitatively the football world thinks we're regressing and is firing up the torches and pitchforks
Click to expand...
Sums it up. Hard to argue with a lot of what is said. We are open targets at the moment. Let's see if the club fights back in PR terms. I doubt it.
 
ferball said:
Okay. I'm saying things are rosy am I?

What I'm really doing is looking for any positives because that's better than carrying on like a fu**en crybaby.

There are positives too but people like you not only don't want to see them, you're shit canning other posters for noticing or mentioning them. Just fu** off.
Click to expand...
No. If I am one side of the coin you and a few others on here are the complete opposite where all negatives are rebadged in a positive light to absolve people at the club.

The percentage of 60 actually flatters us. The noise in the media is fair and people at the club should be very much on notice from board members, to coaching staff, to senior players.

It all needs to start this week with the club making senior players accountable for once and not making token changes to feign accountability.
And it shouldn’t just be Kayne Turner (who shouldn’t be in our list next season).
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Psicosis said:


6:14
Click to expand...


I think there's close to 17 hypocritical list managers out there if the protests against us getting a PP are accurate.

However I think we have to cop some of the other criticism around attracting players and general trading prowess until we prove otherwise.
 
Wow so we were a Logan McDonald choice away from not being on struggle street. Then apparently other list manages suggest that we could trade to improve our list. Then it gets mentioned that we traded for CCJ and maybe that wasnt the correct decision.

Of course we deserve one we're shit, as shit as any of the clubs that have had one previously.
 
Last edited:
The acurate one said:
Wow so we were a Logan McDonald choice away from not being on struggle street. Then apparently other list manages suggest that we could trade to improve our list. Then it gets mentioned that we traded for CCJ and maybe that wasnt the correct decision.

Of course we deserve one we're shit, as shit as any of the clubs that have had one previously.
Click to expand...
Ross Lyon mentioned we we shit because we delisted so many players. I would suggest the reason we are so shit is because we drafted those players in the first place. Or at least hung onto them too long.

There wouldn't be a team that received a PP who didn't contribute to their own demise.

As for Logan McDonalds, could you imagine how the poor campaigner would be going with us right now? These same people would be saying we should've picked Phillips.

Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk
 
archerboy said:
An uncompromised draft you say? Wonder how many list managers will give up their zone/lga/father son picks to achieve that? Not many I’m tipping
Click to expand...

I'd love to see an uncompromised draft, but the facts are we don't have one so just give us what every other club in our position has been given.
 
archerboy said:
An uncompromised draft you say? Wonder how many list managers will give up their zone/lga/father son picks to achieve that? Not many I’m tipping
Click to expand...

I think that’s the point they make, but it’s really just because they don’t want us to get a leg up at the draft. Our list manager would say the same if the tables were turned.
 
Passmore said:
Ross Lyon mentioned we we shit because we delisted so many players. I would suggest the reason we are so shit is because we drafted those players in the first place. Or at least hung onto them too long.

There wouldn't be a team that received a PP who didn't contribute to their own demise.

As for Logan McDonalds, could you imagine how the poor campaigner would be going with us right now? These same people would be saying we should've picked Phillips.

Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Michael that is why you are the 389,357th best poster across Big Footy boards. FYI you've moved up 3 spots this week alone.
Good job!

Yes, yes and Yes I still remember finishing 4th last and the three clubs below us all had a PP.

We took Hales, who became Hale at the Hawks.

1651123225917.png
 
kangatime said:
You haven't show me anywhere that Melbourne or Richmond have published their plan. They've announced the outcomes they are striving from but that's not publishing the plan. You have no idea what the measurable KPIs were within the plan. They just announced the desire to be successful to appease the stupidity of their members.
Click to expand...
Richmond sorta published their plan, in 2010.

www.richmondfc.com.au

Flashback to ‘Winning Together’ launch

It’s exactly 10 years to the day (March 2, 2010) since Richmond players, coaches, staff and directors gathered in the Club’s gymnasium to hear CEO Brendon Gale outline the Tigers’ vision for building the next era of sustained Yellow and Black success.
www.richmondfc.com.au www.richmondfc.com.au

"If we could boil the whole plan to its fundamental essence, it means that by 2014 we expect to deliver 3-0-75

• 3 finals appearances (including 1 top 4 finish)
• zero debt
• 75,000 members"

They played their third finals series in a row in 2015, and I CBF looking any deeper. But if you want to get technical, they failed to reach all of those goals.

There was also the target mentioned in the speech of winning three flags by 2020, which of course they did.

Also worth mentioning that in 2011, Carlton published their plan, which aimed for two flags by 2015. As this article so succinctly put it: Instead, the club sacked two coaches

Bunch of other plans in there, too. Worth a read to see how everyone deals with them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

KillaKanga
Media street
Replies
3
Views
417
Gasometer
Gasometer
The Warlord
  • Locked
  • Poll
Should ex club staffers and execs stop bagging us on social media?
2 3 4
Replies
87
Views
3K
Chadwiko
Chadwiko
koshari
MVP Votes v cats
2
Replies
35
Views
1K
Twinkletoes
Twinkletoes
T
MVP AFLW Round 6 v Richmond votes
Replies
16
Views
523
Twinkletoes
Twinkletoes
Skarrz
Autopsy v Dogs
8 9 10 11 12
Replies
298
Views
11K
the big lebowski
T
Twinkletoes
MVP R18 Votes: Shitney v North
Replies
24
Views
839
ferball
ferball
Moti
Changes v Tiggy Tigers
9 10 11 12 13
Replies
309
Views
13K
Caracas
Caracas

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top