Probably.Did we work together?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Probably.Did we work together?
Let me think another top end talent or another shit coach? Hard decision Lloydy………That article quoting Lloyd and Lyon was trash. ‘Getting another top pick into your club is the last thing you want’ - suggesting added funding for an assistant coach would be better. Are you kidding me? Lloyd can fu** right off.
Blood in the water always gets the pihranas excited.Caro, Mclure, Lloyd and Ross getting into us again.
For a club people keep saying is irrelevant they sure do talk about us a lot.
Pathetic wanna be bullies love a pile on. They are scavengers, not predators.Blood in the water always gets the pihranas excited.
The very definition of preaching to the choir.You know how to extract likes on here Bazza!
Honestly it just doesn't have any value. It's boring. Two years ago they were all telling us that we had a middling list that was going to go nowhere, then we cut our list and it was a "shock", then we struggle after gutting most of our senior depth and they're up there telling us we need to "defend better" - I mean, come on.Pathetic wanna be bullies love a pile on. They are scavengers, not predators.
It will kill them to give us a priority pick, particularly one at the pointy end. Absolutely kill them.I hope the afl give us draft concessions for 3 years in a row and we win a couple of flags and the other teams spew about it for years to come.
Honestly it just doesn't have any value. It's boring. Two years ago they were all telling us that we had a middling list that was going to go nowhere, then we cut our list and it was a "shock", then we struggle after gutting most of our senior depth and they're up there telling us we need to "defend better" - I mean, come on.
It's not that we're not playing poorly and struggling, it's that these people are getting paid for their opinions and they are crepe paper thin analysis. Football media in this country is honestly at the level of high school yard chats IMO.
Where is the analysis of cuts, drafting and retained senior depth and what that says about our priorities?
Where is the analysis of who was kept and why and what that says about the planning the club has done and it's values?
Where are the questions about what type of skillset and team structure we are looking to have in place come 2024 when we would realistically be expecting to have our list bedding down and looking to seriously compete?
Where is the analysis of who we have with value that we should look to leverage for draft capital in the meantime vs who we need to retain to maintain loyalty, experience and minimum cap spend?
Finally - after almost 2 decades of the exact same approach to building by the AFL industry as a whole - where is the analysis of how this is is primarily led by the competition structure and in particular: List sizes, draft system, minimum cap spends and the lack of a proper reserves system.
No, instead we have the media talking about trying harder and generic statements like defence comes first.
Yeah. Semantics mostly, when I said "seriously" I was thinking along the lines of winning more often than not as the defining line rather than necessarily being a threat at top 4 / flags but I agree with you. I think all going well that's probably the target point where they'd be realistically expecting to be an opponent to worry about for the best teams.Agree with all this but I wouldn't expect us to be seriously competing until 2025.
I read this post in a Caro voice and my internal dialogue mechanism almost drowned in saliva saying "nonthenthical".The very definition of preaching to the choir.
But seriously, fu** her - continually takes aim at smaller clubs, including a nonsensical vendetta against North, but pays lip service to bigger clubs.
The very definition of preaching to the choir.
But seriously, fu** her - continually takes aim at smaller clubs, including a nonsensical vendetta against North, but pays lip service to bigger clubs.
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
Personally I don't think PP's should exist full stop - that doesn't mean I think we should be the test case for a policy change. They have them and those picks have directly benefited our opponents (at our expense). Cough them up or get rid of them completely. Same should apply to all of the academy nonsense. I'd redo the whole draft system if I had my way.Almost every club that finds itself anchored to the bottom of the ladder is there due to self-inflicted choices. The only time it's not self-inflicted is if the list suffers mass and key injuries. In that case, you absolutely don't deserve priority picks as there will be a quick rebound. This is what has happened to Hawthorn and Collingwood this year. So really, the ONLY reason that any club should get priority picks is due to the fact that they are uncompetitive over three years, and that is inevitably because they have taken a wrong turn or two in the years prior, ie self-inflicted. To argue that we don't deserve a PP due to self-inflicted poor choices is to argue against the first premise of the draft, which is equalisation. All you are doing is ensuring that North Melbourne stays on the bottom indefinitely. If that lasts another 2 years, or 5 years, or 10 years, are you still going to argue no priority picks for North Melbourne because way back in the early 2020s, they delisted Jasper Pittard?
Boris the chicken says “Hi”.I'll always remember her (non)-treatment of Damian Hardwick's hub personal "hi-jinks".
If that had been at one of her targeted clubs she would've setup a dedicated 24 hours channel Bill Clinton impeachment style to cover it around the clock.
The very definition of preaching to the choir.
But seriously, fu** her - continually takes aim at smaller clubs, including a nonsensical vendetta against North, but pays lip service to bigger clubs.
The worse part of listening to SEN during the day is they continually play her podcast commercial to promote it. But it does give me a laugh when the witch say cristhis (crisis) . She is a vindictive piece of work who uses her newspaper to put our club down.
On a side note cannot watch footy classified because of her but so like the snippets on here from time to time.
Unfortunately she is like a dog with a bone
Yes she does , and I would sooner eat foil paper on my fillings than listen to itShe has a podcast? Christ almighty. What type of person would deliberately seek that out to listen to it?
Energistically? Wtf?Choose forur digits between zero and nine. Any digits (example: 3, 4, 2, 7).
Using those numbers, pick the word from the four lists that aligns with the corresponding digit you chose (3, 4, 2, 7 yields: dynamically deliver flexible outcomes).
This is how corporate reports are written. To take the piss, I have genuinely done this in more than one workplace - I even showed the buzz phrase generator to my boss and he used it to create powerpoints for the executives and they loved the results.
0assertively 1dramatically 2dynamically 3efficiently 4energistically 5enthusiastically 6objectively 7proactively 8professionally 9seamlessly 0build 1communicate 2create 3cultivate 4deliver 5develop 6empower 7reinvent 8transition 9unleash 0empowered 1enabled 2flexible 3focused 4innovative 5proactive 6professional 7top-line 8transformational 9uplifted 0adoption 1benefits 2core competencies 3experiences 4human capital 5motivation 6opportunities 7outcomes 8results 9results