List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Darling's a good signing for North. Play him deep forward he will do a lot of the physical work and take a lot of pressure of Larkey. He's still got excellent forward craft and is a good ruckman in the F50.

He will also be a great mentor for their young forward's, him and JK were on another level at working together back in the day.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

With all this talk of Baker downgrading pick 3.

Let's us do the same.

Pick 2 + Darling for Pick 3 + Darling + Hawks Pick 30.

Norf don't need to use picks we win
 
Not that keen on a future fourth. Much prefer a 2024 R4 which is currently 58.

Gunston was seen as cooked 2 years ago and he had half a decent season at Brisbane (17 games) and was serviceable for the Hawks this year (18 games). Sometimes it just needs a new club and a specific role.

Darling has proven to be physically durable having played over 20 games each year for the last 4. I sense we have not understood the impact of him and JK as a tandem and then with Oscar not on the park for big chunks of the year and limited inside 50's, his output has suffered.

If it is a F4, I would like to see added to it Norf and us swapping R3 - where we give up F3 and get Norf's R3 this year which is currently 40. Surely Norf do not need high volumes of yuff this year!!

Totally depends on how much salary we pay IMO.

Nothing (or limited, say $100k max for next year) we get a token pick.

If we pay half, then maybe a decent ish upgrade (59-40 or so).

If we pay most, then 40 on its own

We will find away to meet the cap floor… just depends how much we pay players not on our list as to how much we need to frontload and/or can slightly over pay some FA’s


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Totally depends on how much salary we pay IMO.

Nothing (or limited, say $100k max for next year) we get a token pick.

If we pay half, then maybe a decent ish upgrade (59-40 or so).

If we pay most, then 40 on its own

We will find away to meet the cap floor… just depends how much we pay players not on our list as to how much we need to frontload and/or can slightly over pay some FA’s


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Issue is that the Roos will have the same salary cap space as us. Like us, they would prefer pick 40 to more space.
 
People need to get over Brander. Sometimes first round picks don't work out. It's not an exact science, no one can tell the future. Move on.

Quite often lately.

Venables - Dead (but was the real winner in the end.... IF you know what I mean)
Brander - Gone
Chesser - Ugh
Hewett - 😨 love him, but I've got no faith.


Ginbey projects as a solid selection at least. Thank god for that. Pick split would've looked atrocious if he wasn't.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It's very simple.

We trade Pick 2 + Darling to North Melbourne

In return we receive from North pick 3 + Darling immediately traded back to WCE + Hawks Pick 30
Eagles refresh their list but also Darling then gets to play his 300th for the Eagles.
 
Quite often lately.

Venables - Dead (but was the real winner in the end.... IF you know what I mean)
Brander - Gone
Chesser - Ugh
Hewett - 😨 love him, but I've got no faith.


Ginbey projects as a solid selection at least. Thank god for that. Pick split would've looked atrocious if he wasn't.
Hewett is Exhibit A in the case for mandated medical screenings of draftees. It's a nonsense that its apparently not allowed.

I'd agree Ginbey is "solid" provided your definition of solid is Duggan v2.0.
 
I get the feeling the Darling trade will be a lot less than we expect.

He'll be traded for a token pick (pick 58) and us possibly picking up part of his salary as well.
58 is reasonable if we are being unbiased, which is rare from some of the recent posts I have read.

I can’t imagine NM have any salary cap pressure given their list is no good, but if they wanted us to pay his salary then maybe we could push for JD + 59 for 40 + 64 or similar.

More likely just a late pick as you mentioned.
 
I feel like whatever pick we get for Darling will be on traded to get Dev…
Surely no one can complain about that…… along with an extra salary cap space it creates. Still a little weird no genuine connect. Just speculation due to last year.

Might be off the cards when Garcia and Peatling tell their clubs they want to be an Eagle in 2025 in the next couple of days.
 
trade idea:

Pick 7 and Jake Waterman to Geelong for Pick 2 and Jake Waterman and Essendon's F1
 
58 for darling isn't too bad. GC, Carlton and Brisbane are going to burn through at least a dozen picks bidding on their academy/Fson's so that 58 could still come back to mid 40s. I mean 58 or 40 from North is kinda the same pick anyway. What wouldn't be good is if it's an f3 or f4 that'd suck we want picks in this years draft.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top