List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pretty rough to give them their marching orders a day before the club champion awards. A couple of days wouldn't have hurt.
That being said, I have no issues with us delisting the rest of them and paying out Sheed unless there is interest from other teams.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The delistings announced today come as no surprise and more should be expected largely depending on our success or otherwise in attracting trade/FA targets

Wish JD all the best. Underrated and overly criticised for much of his career he gets to eke out another year or two at North. Makes sense for all involved

Would prefer 58 to 64 but at that stage of the draft it’s splitting hairs
 
I actually think delisting Jordyn Baker is a pretty poor decision. He's been just as consistent as Dewar in the WAFL mess over the last few seasons, and we've seen how well Tyrell has done coming into the seniors.

We are also nearly completely bereft of players who can offer real drive from the backline. I'd have delisted the likes of Witherden and Rotham (who never grew into that role) before Baker, who has some dash about him.

Maybe I'm overreacting because I'm irked by the fact he was never given a single chance at senior level.

Ultimately it goes down as an 'easy' delisting on paper. Reckon he goes on to have a good state career.
 
I actually think delisting Jordyn Baker is a pretty poor decision. He's been just as consistent as Dewar in the WAFL mess over the last few seasons, and we've seen how well Tyrell has done coming into the seniors.

We are also nearly completely bereft of players who can offer real drive from the backline. I'd have delisted the likes of Witherden and Rotham (who never grew into that role) before Baker, who has some dash about him.

Maybe I'm overreacting because I'm irked by the fact he was never given a single chance at senior level.

Ultimately it goes down as an 'easy' delisting on paper. Reckon he goes on to have a good state career.

Decent WAFL player is probably his level

Would like us to keep him on at the Beagles if he’s interested with the carrot of a relisting if he improves
 
Decent WAFL player is probably his level

Would like us to keep him on at the Beagles if he’s interested with the carrot of a relisting if he improves
Realistically if he wants to improve enough to get another crack at an AFL career he should go to a different WAFL club.

Beagles is a graveyard for development.
 
I actually think delisting Jordyn Baker is a pretty poor decision. He's been just as consistent as Dewar in the WAFL mess over the last few seasons, and we've seen how well Tyrell has done coming into the seniors.

We are also nearly completely bereft of players who can offer real drive from the backline. I'd have delisted the likes of Witherden and Rotham (who never grew into that role) before Baker, who has some dash about him.

Maybe I'm overreacting because I'm irked by the fact he was never given a single chance at senior level.

Ultimately it goes down as an 'easy' delisting on paper. Reckon he goes on to have a good state career.
We need to delist somebody, and is Baker projecting to be worthy of a best 22 spot for us? probably not

Better to keep the senior bodies who can provide leadership and cover(Witho not Rotham) than another teenager alongside the kids who we think actually have a future at AFL level.

Not every player on an AFL list gets a debut, thats not how it works
 
Feel sorry for any player delisted, but that's the industry.
Fairly certain the club gives some support in post AFL life.
Sumich has been interesting around Zane Trew, after saying 'he can sook it up a little after getting feedback'..paraphrasing.
Unsure if Suma has said his real position is defensive mid, though.
1 qtr v Patrick Cripps put that to bed.
Hopefully, for Trew, he gets picked up again AFL...don't really see it.
Saving that, hope he tears it up for Swan Districts, gets a Sandover & helps keep Peel out of another WAFL GF.
 
We need to delist somebody, and is Baker projecting to be worthy of a best 22 spot for us? probably not

Better to keep the senior bodies who can provide leadership and cover(Witho not Rotham) than another teenager alongside the kids who we think actually have a future at AFL level.

Not every player on an AFL list gets a debut, thats not how it works
I'm aware of that, it isn't puppydogs and rainbows. But I definitely feel Baker deserved a debut more than most given what he and Dewar endured during 2023 especially.

The cover argument is more than fair, I just feel as though I'd take a punt on a Baker rather than retain somebody who has proven to be below AFL standard.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Realistically if he wants to improve enough to get another crack at an AFL career he should go to a different WAFL club.

Beagles is a graveyard for development.

Probably, but we need to build our WAFL depth which means recruiting/retaining as many players with WAFL ability as possible
 
My feelings on Zane Trew

Season 6 Episode 25 GIF by SpongeBob SquarePants
 
I'm aware of that, it isn't puppydogs and rainbows. But I definitely feel Baker deserved a debut more than most given what he and Dewar endured during 2023 especially.

The cover argument is more than fair, I just feel as though I'd take a punt on a Baker rather than retain somebody who has proven to be below AFL standard.

I am with you in regards to Baker. I like him as a player, just needed another year in the gym, but has dash and skills.
I am disappointed in his delisting too.
 
Still haven’t quite hit the 10 changes Simmo predicted. But assume LEdwards will be medically retired.

Trew the stiffest of the three announced today but not unexpected after barely surviving last season.

Witherden and Rotham seemingly lucky (so far) but the latter reportedly has some interest as a UFA (surprisingly).

Jamieson a chance to get the Zac Langdon treatment? Sheed also doesn’t add much to the list for next season for mine. If his foot doesn’t come up for preseason I’d like him paid out too so we have a spot for the SSP period before the start of next year.
 
My feelings on Zane Trew

Season 6 Episode 25 GIF by SpongeBob SquarePants
Had Noah Long not done his knee the retention of Zane Trew would have meant we missed out on Hutch in the MSD. It was a stupid decision then and it is still a stupid decision now.

In saying that thanks Zane, I did enjoy your breakout game and that time you punched your soon to be coach’s son in the guts.

All the best for the future.
 
Not happy with Trew going. Actually has the right attributes and toughness. Not enough opportunity.

Only reason I see to delist is because we will try to trade out Rotham for a pathetic type draft pick and perhaps redrafting Trew.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top