List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Log in to remove this ad.

He is an idiot. I have a player who wants to leave then I should be able to get his value back.
But that just makes it harder again for rebuilding teams, who get their picks pushed back further(like us) because a player wanted to move.

Realistically, they need to take control back from the players and simply let the clubs trade against their consent so they can fob them off a year early if they won't resign past FA.
 
He is an idiot. I have a player who wants to leave then I should be able to get his value back.
All theyve gotta do it adjust the FA compo on a year to year basis. Clearly Battle is a band2/3 player, so they should take what Battles contract is, at 850k over however many years, and make that equal band 2/3 whichever.

There will be a geniune A-grader moving club at some point who will fetch the same compo as a solid B grader like Battle or Perryman

Having a set formula doesnt work, needs some subjectivity on a year to year basis imo
 
All theyve gotta do it adjust the FA compo on a year to year basis. Clearly Battle is a band2/3 player, so they should take what Battles contract is, at 850k over however many years, and make that equal band 2/3 whichever.

There will be a geniune A-grader moving club at some point who will fetch the same compo as a solid B grader like Battle or Perryman

Having a set formula doesnt work, needs some subjectivity on a year to year basis imo

I like an open system. If we have a player who is at FA then we decide the price not the AFL. If we have Harley Reid wanting to leave then we should be able to say we want 2 picks in the top 10 and he has our blessing. But he ain’t just going because he is a FA and we get screwed all the time we have put into him.
 
My boy Will Hayes showed out today if we can pick him up around 61 will be very happy

One of the very best kicks in the draft I actually rate his kicking better than Berry's


He and Hamish would be a great combination

Claremont trio Will Hayes, Cody Angove, Hamish Davis impress in 2km time trial at AFL Draft Combine​

Claremont wingman Will Hayes has impressed in the 2km time trial, finishing equal third in a strong start to the AFL Draft Combine in Melbourne.

Hayes registered a time of 6min. 18sec. alongside South Australian defender Angus Clarke, with Sydney Academy prospect Joel Cochran first with a good time of 6:05 at Collingwood’s AIA Centre.

Bendigo Pioneers star Tobie Travaglia was second with 6:13 to boost his chances of being one of the first names called out this year.


Hayes’ Tigers teammate Hamish Davis also put in a strong effort to finish, while fellow Claremont premiership star Cody Angove ran it in 6:28 to round out the best of the West Australians.

A total of 10 West Australian AFL draft hopefuls flew to Melbourne on Thursday to be put through the three-days of testing and interviews ahead of the draft in November.

Claremont defender Clancy Dennis was the only one who will not do any of the physical testing because of a foot injury he picked up in the colts grand final late last month.

More interviews with clubs will be held on Saturday before the vertical jump, running vertical jump, 20m sprint and agility test take place on Sunday.

Hayes and Angove as well as South Fremantle’s Jaxon Artemis will also be looking to impress in the 20m sprint later this weekend.

It comes as West Coast next generation academy product Malakai Champion revealed he was yet to be told by the Eagles if they would be drafting him.

Changes to the rules mean the Eagles can match bids on Champion at any time in this year’s draft rather than only after pick No.40 — a rule which had them miss out on Lance Collard last year after he was selected by the Saints with pick No.28.

Champion, who kicked three goals on WAFL league debut for Subiaco against West Coast, said he was unsure if he would be at Mineral Resources Park next year despite the club having first access.

“No indication from West Coast at all. I met with them early in the year,” Champion told AFL.com.au.

“I met with eight clubs during the speed dates with the academy.

“We had another speed date at WA where I met with another three. I met with three other clubs after, so it’s about 14 clubs total now.”
 
I like an open system. If we have a player who is at FA then we decide the price not the AFL. If we have Harley Reid wanting to leave then we should be able to say we want 2 picks in the top 10 and he has our blessing. But he ain’t just going because he is a FA and we get screwed all the time we have put into him.

I don't mind if the AFL set the price HOWEVER the price needs to be met by the Club that the FA goes to, NOT by the AFL throwing in another pick.

Such as Battle being deemed by the AFL as pick 8 then the Hawks have to pony up the draft capital to get him.
With a caveat on any first round grade placed on a player the the Receiving Club has to either have a first rounder themselves OR have to trade for one, after the first round, then any picks can be forfeited from any place in the draft order.

That way the receiving Club doesn't get a free hit and compromise the draft order as much as it happens now.
 
I don't mind if the AFL set the price HOWEVER the price needs to be met by the Club that the FA goes to, NOT by the AFL throwing in another pick.

Such as Battle being deemed by the AFL as pick 8 then the Hawks have to pony up the draft capital to get him.
With a caveat on any first round grade placed on a player the the Receiving Club has to either have a first rounder themselves OR have to trade for one, after the first round, then any picks can be forfeited from any place in the draft order.

That way the receiving Club doesn't get a free hit and compromise the draft order as much as it happens now.

But if I have a superstar who is a FA then my club should be able to demand what he is worth. If that’s pick 1 then so be it.
Currently the AFL are saying that superstar is not worth much. They should have no say.
 
But if I have a superstar who is a FA then my club should be able to demand what he is worth. If that’s pick 1 then so be it.
Currently the AFL are saying that superstar is not worth much. They should have no say.

Well then the Clubs wont get many trades done so the AFLPA, will bitch and moan and the AFL will get involved.


I am not saying that I agree with it but you need to look just why the AFL agreed to FA in the first place, its was an ALFPA initiative to allow player to leave to go to their Club of choice as a reward for services rendered.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Well then the Clubs wont get many trades done so the AFLPA, will bitch and moan and the AFL will get involved.


I am not saying that I agree with it but you need to look just why the AFL agreed to FA in the first place, its was an ALFPA initiative to allow player to leave to go to their Club of choice as a reward for services rendered.

Yes I know, so I think then just give them the choice to play for who you want right at the start.
 
Yes I know, so I think then just give them the choice to play for who you want right at the start.

Oh then thats a completely different topic.... but as a Western Australian who follows West Coast I do love that idea :yellowheart::blueheart:
 
Oh then thats a completely different topic.... but as a Western Australian who follows West Coast I do love that idea :yellowheart::blueheart:

I think you nominate for the draft and you say my preference is to play for West Coast and my second preference is to play for Essendon.
If neither of those clubs want you then you have to go where you get chosen.
 
I wouldn't care tbh, the sooner they make it a level playing field the better. I'd get rid of the FS rule and NGA tomorrow if I could too
NGA is another system brought in with great intention that works about as well as my dad's back in the cold.

IE - It doesn't.
 
I don't mind if the AFL set the price HOWEVER the price needs to be met by the Club that the FA goes to, NOT by the AFL throwing in another pick.

Such as Battle being deemed by the AFL as pick 8 then the Hawks have to pony up the draft capital to get him.
With a caveat on any first round grade placed on a player the the Receiving Club has to either have a first rounder themselves OR have to trade for one, after the first round, then any picks can be forfeited from any place in the draft order.

That way the receiving Club doesn't get a free hit and compromise the draft order as much as it happens now.
Looks like the saints are getting overcompensated. The club of the departing player should only get the same number pick
that was used to draft that player originally.
 
Get rid of compensation for FA. Player has served his time at the club which drafted him and he can now choose where he plays.

Crack down hard on draft tempering. No more "I don't want to leave Vic" shenanigans.

Allow clubs access to NGA talent outside of the draft pool. Something like 1 kid per year can be taken out of a clubs NGA and directly onto an AFL list.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top