Really? I love whiting. Very tasty.
List Mgmt. Contracts. Trades. Draft. Other Assorted Crap. 2020 Edition
- Thread starter Convocation
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
We are up to our eyeballs in the De Yeoy deal as we speak - likely to be done early in the trade week which will open up loads of time to target even more big fish!
He would displace Ah chee and to cement his spot be up to being a centre square rotation late in quarters.
And we are after players in that age bracket. A bigger body and smart player.
Would Alec improve the quality of our depth? And cost nothing.
In a compromised draft we have no great picks in.
Hahaha
- Oct 17, 2018
- 1,851
- 3,503
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Someone who knows Bubba has already said he hasnt been able to lift weights, so wait and see after this off season
If I recall Cox’s brother was runner up to Matt Eagles, who was also delisted by Brisbane today, on The Recruit which was on Foxtel for only two seasons about 4 or 5 years ago.
very under rated
This player card shit has completely ruined reading bigfooty on tapatalk
3/10
Go into your preferences - at the very bottom click the box to turn off player stats bbcode. Turns it all off thank god!!! Was driving me ****ing nuts.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 17,464
- 47,844
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Waterman is a list size issue. Eagles still have absiolutely zero idea what our list size is next year. We will pick him up if we can nab him as a rookie
We have also made a request to have Venables stay on as a Cat B rookie which is likely to be granted. AFL will announce some rules about it but will become a competition wide thing when you can keep players outside your main list but in a non playing role unless otherwise approved by the AFL . So they are training with your team 100% of the time, paid by your team, but dont make up the squad unless the AFL approve a list swap. So if Luke Foley gets eaten by a shark for example and Venables is on our Cat B list then we can swap Venables for Foley aslong as AFL approve. AFL can say no, he shouldnt have gone shark diving, tough luck.
We are not the only team to make this request either. Gold Coast and GWS wanted this for a long time in relation to picking up player/coaches. GWS wanted it for Mumford and Gold Coast for Rischitelli before he retired too but got told no, they have to be fully fledged rookies instead
We have also made a request to have Venables stay on as a Cat B rookie which is likely to be granted. AFL will announce some rules about it but will become a competition wide thing when you can keep players outside your main list but in a non playing role unless otherwise approved by the AFL . So they are training with your team 100% of the time, paid by your team, but dont make up the squad unless the AFL approve a list swap. So if Luke Foley gets eaten by a shark for example and Venables is on our Cat B list then we can swap Venables for Foley aslong as AFL approve. AFL can say no, he shouldnt have gone shark diving, tough luck.
We are not the only team to make this request either. Gold Coast and GWS wanted this for a long time in relation to picking up player/coaches. GWS wanted it for Mumford and Gold Coast for Rischitelli before he retired too but got told no, they have to be fully fledged rookies instead
- Mar 19, 2020
- 17,464
- 47,844
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Jan 13, 2013
- 24,031
- 48,494
- AFL Club
- West Coast
This is f****** ridiculous, the VaFL have to be the most amateurish league in the world
Damn fine question...I'll get back to you! ((;
Just stop doing them, rushing those behinds!
Makes it more exciting, nervewracking..
Or you could keep rushed behinds, because there's no doubt over them, no score reviews.
But rushed behinds are another inconsistency within the game, should be a (own) goal in theory?
But if anyone touches the ball after a kick and cant stop it, it's a goal.
If it scrapes the post but goes in, it's a goal. Same for a point.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 17,464
- 47,844
- AFL Club
- West Coast
The reasoning is they are still in negotiations with the AFLPA...
- Jan 13, 2013
- 24,031
- 48,494
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Suppose they want to cut a bit more heavily into the list than the PA are happy with.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 17,464
- 47,844
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Nah, they are negotiating alot more then just that. Rules/wages are all changing too.
Its truly remarkable how much effort is going in to saving a monetary amount that is lower then Israel Folaus contract was
- Jan 13, 2013
- 24,031
- 48,494
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Just what the game needs, more rule changes.
Carbine Chaos
See My Chess
- Apr 1, 2009
- 65,815
- 100,163
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Perth FC, Everton, Delhi
Hypothetically if they announced list sizes and we couldn’t pick Waterman up because of it, I’d be extremely unhappy that we gave, say, Foley a contract extension already.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 17,464
- 47,844
- AFL Club
- West Coast
In what way? One is a back pocket, the other is a FP. Its list balance.
We just send Foley to Esperance to go scuba diving, invite the sharks and list spot opens up.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 17,464
- 47,844
- AFL Club
- West Coast
"Can you hold this bucket of blood for me"
Carbine Chaos
See My Chess
- Apr 1, 2009
- 65,815
- 100,163
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Perth FC, Everton, Delhi
And yet if we had a spot free in the back pocket and only Foley and AW to pick from, I know who I’d be giving a chance to.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
- Locked
- Poll
