How??!!?Wooo stupid stats things gone
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How??!!?Wooo stupid stats things gone
went to preferences on the desktop version. it was a little box you check to stop seeing them then save changesHow??!!?
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Ah desktop version.ill give it a go.this is rubbishwent to preferences on the desktop version. it was a little box you check to stop seeing them then save changes
Don't know heaps about him. Is he a small forward who can tackle?
Was flicking through the 2019 Prospectus and Champion Data had this to say about Zac Langdons' 2018 season.
"Langdon was a valuable forward half pressure player, with the Giants scoring from 26% of turnovers caused by his pressure - the third best percentage of the top 100 pressure players. He was also one of only five general forwards to rate elite for tackles and forward half pressure acts per game. His kicking was a major weapon, recording an elite kick rating and above average shot at goal accuracy.
Langdon was only average for goals per game and had an involvement in just 15.5% of his side's scoring chains".
Don't know heaps about him. Is he a small forward who can tackle?
He's DFA I believe..As for C.Cox from Brisbane, if he is free I would offer him a rookie list spot.
Fast, good carry and good kick; question marks over his ability in the contest however.
Lions are stacked in his preferred positions down back and up forward, so he hasn't had much of a look-in.
Would provide a good alternative backup running option off halfback with Watson now gone.
Can see him being very well-suited to what Longmire is creating in Fremantle's defence and being complementary to Wilson there.
Would not be at all surprised if they go hard after him and swap their 2nd (28) for Brisbane's 3rd (38) plus a lower pick next year.
Everyone laughs, but everyone would do it. No questions asked. Everyone says no to Cripps, yet is we swapped Williams for Cripps everyone would cream.You would not trade Williams for pick 1.
That pretty much confirms you have NFI mate.
Anyone else who wouldnt trade Bailey for pick 1? Anyone?
im sure it is but on my phone its just 50 lines of nothingI think the stats box that pops up for players (on PC at least) is pretty cool.
Not everyone.Everyone laughs, but everyone would do it. No questions asked. Everyone says no to Cripps, yet is we swapped Williams for Cripps everyone would cream.
54 ? He was originally pick 56 and can't get a game for a team who didn't make finals .When he is up and running, it is probably his biggest strength.
From 3 pages back:
If we get him for pick 54 he will be a very handy pickup.
You would not trade Williams for pick 1.
That pretty much confirms you have NFI mate.
Anyone else who wouldnt trade Bailey for pick 1? Anyone?
Collingwood were missing half their squad in that gameJust watching replay of WC demolishing the Pies in Rd 8 of this year with McGovern out injured.
No Ah Chee, Ainsworth, Reid, Brandner, Vardy, Hickey etc and we look awesome.
Genuinely believe out top 22 odd beats anyone, but as everyone knows a fair few of our players outside of this wouldn’t get a game at Freo.
Surely we can pry out an experienced mid, Half Fwd & Half back from other clubs that aren’t in contention or even WAFL or SANFL. Even Haydn Scliothe fron Souths would offer more than blokes like Reid, Ainsworth whilst we are the window.
54 is not a big payment. lt is a much lower risk to take someone you know can play at the level than someone who may not make it or would take years to get there. 54 is a pretty speculative pick.54 ? He was originally pick 56 and can't get a game for a team who didn't make finals .
When we have little in the way of draft collateral I wouldn't be giving up 54 .
54 is not a big payment. lt is a much lower risk to take someone you know can play at the level than someone who may not make it or would take years to get there. 54 is a pretty speculative pick.
Our hand is thin but that’s what we have to deal with through paying top price for Kelly.
Without a first rounder 54 would be our 3rd pick in the draft . Why would we trade it for a player who demands a late throw away pick . 4th or 5th rounder .54 ? He was originally pick 56 and can't get a game for a team who didn't make finals .
When we have little in the way of draft collateral I wouldn't be giving up 54 .
Pick 70 back would be good, might be around pick 60 with all the bail outs, could be good to pick A. Waterman.Will just be your typical pick 54 for Langdon and pick 70 deal.
Just give them a 4th and be done with it .Will just be your typical pick 54 for Langdon and pick 70 deal.
Just give them a 4th and be done with it .
They traded all of scully pattern ahern for 4th rounders