Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
yea thanks for appointing maxwell captain that gave me a great laughThanx Tiger fans! This thread gave me a great laugh!
It's merely the to-and-fro of a bitter rivalry that goes back 100 years. Personally, I'm not arguing that we won anything with Cousins drafting, I'm arguing that Carlton suck and we hate their guts.What are you trying to prove by arguing that you "won"?
Fair enough, then.I'm arguing that Carlton suck and we hate their guts.
I understand you really wanting to beat them whenever you play them.
But this is not a situation where you are in competition with each other.
The Judd deal and your decision to draft Cousins are separate episodes.
You would never have got Judd. Carlton would never have drafted Cousins.
What are you trying to prove by arguing that you "won"?
For what it's worth Gunnar, we aren't all stupid. I agree with pretty much everything you've said in this thread.
Mate, I lived there for 20 years, and spent a fair chunk of that time living in those inner northeast suburbs. So don't give me this line about you being an expert and me not knowing anything about Melbourne.
You're resorting to a "shows how much you know" argument yet again. It's ordinary.
Your comment was that Richmond was inner-city, so was totally different to Carlton. I'm just pointing out the inadequacy of that explanation as Carlton is also inner-city.
If you want to compare the circumstances, then you can easily argue that the Tigers got a better deal, because they didn't have to trade for Cousins.
If that's your only argument, it goes without saying.
But if you are comparing the players, and suggesting that Richmond got the more valuable player, you're kidding yourself.
Would you swap for Cousins for Judd?
You'd be crazy not to.
or i can have my opinion that he still has his best footy in him "champ" and still be open to others opinions that he wont recapture his form from '04 and "state if that happens i'd still be happy with his output like 08" pretty sure didn't move any goal posts, called having an opinion and not letting others have one tooWhatever, champ.
You bristled at suggestions that Judd has played his best footy. Now you're just saying that that's not the be-all and end-all - you're happy with how he's going, even if he doesn't match what he delivered at the Eagles.
That's some vintage goalpost-shifting.
You either reject the suggestion that his best footy is behind him, or you don't.
Sorry champ but you're a terrible poster and you don't have a clue what you're talking about. You argue one thing, then when someone disagrees you acuse them of something completely different. Give up.So FWIW, R1 you'll be cheering Cousins or Judd?
And remind me which team do you support again?
check out this little number I cranked out last night...
http://megaswf.com/view/37b1a2cafbbdfe004d75f0a52a575db2.html
The Curious Case of Benjamin Cousins
Sorry champ but you're a terrible poster and you don't have a clue what you're talking about. You argue one thing, then when someone disagrees you acuse them of something completely different. Give up.
Why does me believing 7 or 8 years of Judd is better than a couple of years of Cousins mean I want Judd to perform better? Does that also mean that when I say Gary Ablett Junior is a better player than Jarrod Oakleigh Nicholls I effectively barrack for Geelong when we play them?
I support Richmond by the way. Silly boy, it says it in bold just to the left there.
a) Easy pickingsSo dont spend so much time posting on my threads or answering my posts then.
Sorry? How?Hyprocrite
You've gone over this with Gunnar. I don't disagree that Cousins for free is better than Judd for what we would have had to give up. But going back to your OP, the last 4 of your points seemed to imply that Cousins was going to be more beneficial to the club than Judd as a player - that is, not taking what we had to give up to get him into account.Put the 7 or 8 years of Judd in same context as the OP before you accuse me of switching arguments.
7 years of Judd puts the club at its max for player payments, 3 high draft picks down and sky high expectations. Cousins comes for nothing and anything we get out of him is a bonus. Lets see what people say about Judd if the Blues done make the finals in 2009.
What does that even mean?And Cousins back to the wall situation fits right in with where our club is at.
Good pickup. That doesn't change the fact that Judd on your list is better than Cousins on your list.And Judd doesnt play for our footy club. Cousins now does.
a) Easy pickings
b) You aren't the only person posting in this thread.
Sorry? How?
You've gone over this with Gunnar. I don't disagree that Cousins for free is better than Judd for what we would have had to give up. But going back to your OP, the last 4 of your points seemed to imply that Cousins was going to be more beneficial to the club than Judd as a player - that is, not taking what we had to give up to get him into account.
What does that even mean?
Good pickup. That doesn't change the fact that Judd on your list is better than Cousins on your list.
For what it's worth, I'm glad we got Cousins. His upside is huge, and while there's fairly large potential for failure, how many players that you pick up at pick 6 in the PSD don't have this potential?
Comparing his worth to Judd as a player from here on in in their careers though is ridiculous.
Indicates that yes I had a fair idea that it was a joke. The lack of certainty came from being unaware if you were as unintelligent as a large number of people on Bigfooty.I hope most of that OP was a joke.
Effectively, that is what you and Gunnar argued over, and that is what you and I are now arguing over. You've failed to properly address this point.Cousins wont win another brownlow, but he'll be better for us than Judd will be for them
Cousins v Judd will be the classic battle of good versus evil.
On the side of evil is Chris Judd - the mercenary who walked out on the club he was captain of to chase a dollar at a club coached by Brett 'Rat' Ratten, evil son of the the evil conglomorate that is carlton.
On the side of good is Ben Cousins - a previously troubled soul who has fought his way back from the brink. Bringing hope to thousands of addicts around the country that they can get their life back on track and become respected members of society again just as Ben did, with the help of coach Terry 'Mother Theresa' Wallace and the Mighty Tiges. Saint Ben.
Good will always triumph over evil.
Effectively, that is what you and Gunnar argued over, and that is what you and I are now arguing over. You've failed to properly address this point.