Votes are and should be a reflection of the individual aspects of the game. The score takes care of the team aspect. As such, if a player has a cracking game, even in a losing team (Or a team that gets smashed) why can't they poll votes? If he is getting 35 to 40 touches per game with no support and impacts the game more than any other opposition player doesn't he deserve the votes? Score should be irrelevent in the medal count. That's why so many Brownlow medalists used to come from lower rancked teams, such as South melb, Hawthorn etc