Mega Thread Delist/Trade/Draft Supermegaultrathread - Trade Period Edition

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
28 for Yeo and a player for Bootsma?

kingofpopcorn1.gif

I'm happy with a player for Bootsma, as long as it is someone average. Given our trading so far, we'll start with McGinnity then somehow end up handing over Darling!



**not entirely serious... only a 17% chance of that happening.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So let's take a step back and look at the net result of this saga: Substantial downgrades in all of the first 3 rounds of the draft.

6 -> 11 (And directly strengthening the draft position of one of our foremost rivals, 2 years running)
28 -> 31
44 -> 49 (Before compo's announced)

And all for a player who's

a) out of contract
b) nominated the Eagles as his only desired destination
c) West-Australian
d) A modest utility prospect at best
e) pick 30 from 2 years ago
f) Could've been forced into the PSD
g) Not certain best 22 immediately
h) Doesn't fulfil our most pressing needs (Inside mid)

Good list management. :thumbsu:

*Pending confirmation*
 
We obviously think that the 2 players we're after will be available at 11 and 31. Chill out, we just nabbed a couple of very promising players in the trade period for very little. Hypothetically, if we get those 2 players in the draft, Yeo is more or less a free signing.
 
I wonder if the bootsma player swap could be rosa.

What else do we get?

Although it's us so what else do we give?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So let's take a step back and look at the net result of this saga: Substantial downgrades in all of the first 3 rounds of the draft.

6 -> 11 (And directly strengthening the draft position of one of our foremost rivals, 2 years running)
28 -> 31
44 -> 49 (Before compo's announced)

And all for a player who's

a) out of contract
b) nominated the Eagles as his only desired destination
c) West-Australian
d) A modest utility prospect at best
e) pick 30 from 2 years ago
f) Could've been forced into the PSD
g) Not certain best 22 immediately
h) Doesn't fulfil our most pressing needs (Inside mid)

Good list management. :thumbsu:

*Pending confirmation*

These are not "substantial downgrades".
They are moderate.
 
Seriously people need to relax....what happens if Yeo becomes a 200 gamer and an AA and pick 11 is the mid we have been looking for?

What happens if he doesn't and the pick doesn't?
 
Seriously people need to relax....what happens if Yeo becomes a 200 gamer and an AA and pick 11 is the mid we have been looking for?
That's not the point. There is zero reason we should be giving 28 over 31.

What if Yeo becomes a 200 gamer.
What if the player we take at 31 becomes a dud
what if the player that goes at 28 become a star

I was ok with the deal with the pies, but this just becoming draft pick charity.
 
Seriously people need to relax....what happens if Yeo becomes a 200 gamer and an AA and pick 11 is the mid we have been looking for?


That's kind of what needs to happen before the deal becomes fair though...

Id say 150+ games for Yeo and a B+ grade inside mid and we win. However if pick #6 becomes the second coming of Ablett we loose regardless...
 
Seriously people need to relax....what happens if Yeo becomes a 200 gamer and an AA and pick 11 is the mid we have been looking for?

It's obvious that the West Coast recruiters have a plan regarding 6 & 11, but in both occasions where a fair deal could've been found for both parties, Collingwood and Brisbane appear to have come away with a win (albeit somewhat minor in Brisbane's case).

It just doesn't look good right this second. But yes I agree, we can't really make an informed judgement until a lot of water has passed under the bridge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top