- Jul 14, 2012
- 7,936
- 11,641
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Have we ever received a free kick for a player running too far?
Remember Cripps last year at Marvel...? He ran about 30 metres but that was A-OK from the VFL.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have we ever received a free kick for a player running too far?
I was (guess)working 1.5m/step, so 20-22m which is too far anyway.Yeah it's possible when sprinting. Average stride length for a long distance runner is up around the 1.5m mark or above depending on the person, for sprinters it can go well over 2m.
Harley Reid did exactly that yesterday; very exciting, great goal:If someone breaks away from a pack at a full sprint and they are fast they could be expected to bounce the ball every 6-7 paces in order to not give away a free kick, which reduces the value of running free with the ball, something which creates memorable highlights.
They put it on the highlight reel and replayed it so many times on social media accounts.Remember Cripps last year at Marvel...? He ran about 30 metres but that was A-OK from the VFL.
Agree.Running too far is one of those things that is, as a spectator and a player, pretty easy to spot when you're watching live. That's based on decades of watching football and viewing how a rule has been adjudicated very consistently over a long period of time.
It didn't even cross my mind watching it live that the free was to do with holding the ball. None of the commentators guessed it either.
Strange time to bust out an iffy one.
Look I basically agree, and suspect most others here will feel the same way but for me.This will not be popular:
I understand why many supporters and BF posters are aggrieved by 1) the free not paid to Dawson vs Pies and 2) the point-that-was-a-goal vs Sydney last year, also 3) the Draper fall-on-the-ball non-free vs Essendon and 4) the latest run-too-far free against Rankine.
I'll be honest; at the time, I was furious myself, seriously pi$$ed off, but with time some common sense has to prevail.
The last one 4) is easiest to accept, because we saw what happened afterwards
ie Rankine's kick went to congestion, a pack formed and there's no evidence that we would definitely have goaled from it in the final seconds.
Likewise with 1) and 3) --- had the free been paid, there's no guarantee a goal would have resulted. Think how often players from all Clubs miss easy shots; McKay missed from about 10m dead in front vs. Sydney this Round.
The Sydney fiasco? Well, it was a goal and the Goal Ump got it wrong, badly wrong (but his very human mistake did not deserve the hate and death threats he copped afterwards).
Even so, there was time enough for Sydney to have goaled from the resultant centre bounce and won the game anyway. We have form for losing in those last 90 seconds.
Maybe, maybe not. We'll never know.
If you got this far, what am I saying?
Under Nicks, the Crows find themselves in close positions in the last few minutes, often, and lose them more often than not. It happens too often to be bad luck. It's a trend.
Look at the last (Collingwood) game:
--- they started slowly, got 3 goals down, had to fight back.
--- they got 5 goals down, had to fight back.
--- in the last, they were 18 down with 18mins on the clock, had to fight back, again.
Earlier in game, at least 3 Crows players missed very kickable set-shot goals.
It's their inability in those pressure, must-kick-this moments to close out that cost us that game.
Kick all 3 (win by 11), or 2 of them (win by 6) , or even only one (win by a point) and the Rankine incident becomes irrelevant.
Life/fate/the world/the AFL is not ganging up on us. Non-Melbourne-based teams still win Flags (14 since 1997, our first).
The Crows create those crises, albeit inadvertantly, by just not being good enough to close out close games.
We don't "deserve" to have better; Flag-winning teams make their own luck.
The Crows need to be better.
Pies fans aren't actually that bad and not even in the worst 5 supporter bases.
Credit to us for not dropping him (again) or subbing him. Investing a few games, riding out some flat spots. Hopefully he can keep building and deliver.Cook is improving week on week as well.
Funny that
Now if we could only do that with other kids.Credit to us for not dropping him (again) or subbing him. Investing a few games, riding out some flat spots. Hopefully he can keep building and deliver.
Watched a bit of Footy Furnace last night and they showed the stats for Marshall v Jackson, they are both effectively another midfielder with their clearances, contested possessions and disposals.Weather was mint, row B on level 1 was a great spot. Nothing beats the MCG.
Rankine and Dawson are pure, unadulerated class.
Pies fans aren't actually that bad and not even in the worst 5 supporter bases.
Thought Hamill from the eye looked decent.
Both of Murphy and McHenry suck but Murphy is about 15x better. (15x0 is still 0).
Laird and Smith, good servants, the cliff has come.
Ruckman is the least important position on the field but it's unforgiveable how much ROB sucks and hasn't actually made any inroads in actually looking or playing like a semi-decent footballer. That kicking action is horrific.
I disagree with some points but the general point is very valid. We keep finding ourselves in these positions. Less than a goal down in the last minute.This will not be popular:
I understand why many supporters and BF posters are aggrieved by 1) the free not paid to Dawson vs Pies and 2) the point-that-was-a-goal vs Sydney last year, also 3) the Draper fall-on-the-ball non-free vs Essendon and 4) the latest run-too-far free against Rankine.
I'll be honest; at the time, I was furious myself, seriously pi$$ed off, but with time some common sense has to prevail.
The last one 4) is easiest to accept, because we saw what happened afterwards
ie Rankine's kick went to congestion, a pack formed and there's no evidence that we would definitely have goaled from it in the final seconds.
Likewise with 1) and 3) --- had the free been paid, there's no guarantee a goal would have resulted. Think how often players from all Clubs miss easy shots; McKay missed from about 10m dead in front vs. Sydney this Round.
The Sydney fiasco? Well, it was a goal and the Goal Ump got it wrong, badly wrong (but his very human mistake did not deserve the hate and death threats he copped afterwards).
Even so, there was time enough for Sydney to have goaled from the resultant centre bounce and won the game anyway. We have form for losing in those last 90 seconds.
Maybe, maybe not. We'll never know.
If you got this far, what am I saying?
Under Nicks, the Crows find themselves in close positions in the last few minutes, often, and lose them more often than not. It happens too often to be bad luck. It's a trend.
Look at the last (Collingwood) game:
--- they started slowly, got 3 goals down, had to fight back.
--- they got 5 goals down, had to fight back.
--- in the last, they were 18 down with 18mins on the clock, had to fight back, again.
Earlier in game, at least 3 Crows players missed very kickable set-shot goals.
It's their inability in those pressure, must-kick-this moments to close out that cost us that game.
Kick all 3 (win by 11), or 2 of them (win by 6) , or even only one (win by a point) and the Rankine incident becomes irrelevant.
Life/fate/the world/the AFL is not ganging up on us. Non-Melbourne-based teams still win Flags (14 since 1997, our first).
The Crows create those crises, albeit inadvertantly, by just not being good enough to close out close games.
We don't "deserve" to have better; Flag-winning teams make their own luck.
The Crows need to be better.
“Mutineer” is notionally a home team supporter
Yep.Watched a bit of Footy Furnace last night and they showed the stats for Marshall v Jackson, they are both effectively another midfielder with their clearances, contested possessions and disposals.
We are stuck with an unco who can’t mark, win a clearance and can’t kick. We have to find another ruckman for next year, he’s diabolically bad.
He is one of the very few who doesn't just hack kick or play it safe by kicking long to a contest. When he has the ball he often looks to go inside through the corridor or can hit up a leading player in the forward 50. He has very good vision with ball in hand.Cook is improving week on week as well.
Funny that
I agree. However I am confused , though I rarely post. If Fox lab is correct Izak ran 24.2 meters without bouncing , according to the commentators he took 14 steps. My simple maths suggests each stride is 1.7 meters long. Where have I gone wrong and is this anatomically possible?
ROB is on a whole other level. He kicks like a child that hasn't figured out how to drop the ball onto his boot yet. It's physically painful watching him kick. He makes Gryan Miers look like Darren Jarman in comparison.McHenry would challenge that
Just want to see a bit of "eye of the tiger" from Cooky.Credit to us for not dropping him (again) or subbing him. Investing a few games, riding out some flat spots. Hopefully he can keep building and deliver.
It's actually quite criminal of us to not have someone coming through in that position, given we also clearly don't rate Strachan at all. Where is our up and coming kid?Watched a bit of Footy Furnace last night and they showed the stats for Marshall v Jackson, they are both effectively another midfielder with their clearances, contested possessions and disposals.
We are stuck with an unco who can’t mark, win a clearance and can’t kick. We have to find another ruckman for next year, he’s diabolically bad.