Shoenberg gets several more I think.Another shithouse display from Schoenberg, how many more chances does he get?
While he's not been great, we would want to be pointing fingers at the other mids first.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shoenberg gets several more I think.Another shithouse display from Schoenberg, how many more chances does he get?
I was against Sloane as captain right back when he and Dangerfield shared it. Tex was a much better leader. It's time to find the next one, but the whole leadership group are currently struggling. Keays probably wouldn't be the worst choice right now.Yet so many people on this board wanted Sloane "he is the heart and soul of the club", even before Tex was captain. When Sloane resigned most here were thrilled. Remember it was at a time when us supporters were feeling miserable and some were depressed. It was at a time the club needed to have a victory and Sloanes signature was that victory. I agree right now its feels like we gave him too long a contract but thats easy to say in hindsight.
Hmmm did you forget about the Collingwood game. I have tried to as it was very bad.Good: Again, our endeavour and persistence is first class. Brilliant, other than our sleepy first half against Fremantle, We really have been giving it a massive crack. Today was no different.
Bad: Selection. The real issue for me is that we were clearly too short going into this game under the roof of Marvel. I genuinely think this game was ripe to include Thilthorpe. Was this overlooked? I feel if Thilthorpe was included we would have potentially won more hitouts and at least stop being carved up out the centre. If this game was on any other ground, yes, having four talls is too many. But a super dry Marvel with no breeze played into Essendon's hands.
Ugly: The decision making, blazing away into the forward line and our skills kept killing us all day.
You seriously suggesting his role doesn't include kicking goals? A talented player can do a checkside, he can snap a goal. Both efforts were kicked to someone in the crowd, miles from scoring a goal, both at crucial stages. That has nothing to do with the coaches and thats on him.You do realise pressure acts contribute to turnovers?
Jimmy needs to be kicking bags of goals because he's contributing buhger
You're the one deflecting, you want to bring Hamish into it when Neddy is playing the role the coaches have set for him, that's not Neddy's fault.
Like Murphy he should be getting midfield time when we need a change up, that's on the coaches.
R
Rubbish he's our small pressure forward and basically the only one that delivers in that regard. I.E. Neddy 22 pressure acts, Jimmy 5 pressure acts.
You do realise pressure acts contribute to turnovers?
Jimmy needs to be kicking bags of goals because he's contributing bugger all else.
Another shithouse display from Schoenberg, how many more chances does he get?
His role changed a couple of weeks ago, don’t ask me how but it apparently did.You do realise pressure acts contribute to turnovers?
Jimmy needs to be kicking bags of goals because he's contributing bugger all else.
I wouldn't drop Schoenberg in spite of his poor form. A move out of the centre for a game or two might allow him more freedom to find his form.Another shithouse display from Schoenberg, how many more chances does he get?
He got drafted off of playing mostly midfield/on ball as 2nd banana to Sam Walsh for the Geelong Falcons....We still need a big upgrade in his position. Outside of effort is average at every measure.
Zero goal sense
Average ability to read the play, crumb packs
Average kick for accuracy, below average distance
Below average overhead mark
No evasive skills
He seemingly - outside of effort and a genuinely good team mate - has no defining attribute that got him on a list let alone games
He grew on me last year and I could see Nicks “putting others first” attributes with Ned and I suspect that will keep him in the team.
However he is not developing into a good small forward - 33 games, 13 goals 3 tackles a games and almost 2 frees against
Surely that’s not what we are aiming for through this development phase
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Exactly, there is evidence to suggest that he can respond well from it too. A fit and firing Matt Crouch is a good addition to our midfield, the current version is not.Which is why they shouldn’t be afraid to drop a senior again.
Isn't Keays in the leadership group? He's not strugglingI was against Sloane as captain right back when he and Dangerfield shared it. Tex was a much better leader. It's time to find the next one, but the whole leadership group are currently struggling. Keays probably wouldn't be the worst choice right now.
R
Rubbish he's our small pressure forward and basically the only one that delivers in that regard. I.E. Neddy 22 pressure acts, Jimmy 5 pressure acts.
You'd have to ask the coaches but we seem to want to change quite a few players roles from what they were actually drafted as.Why did we drop the plan for Murphy to get a run on the ball this week - he was great the week before? We seem to have done the same with Rachele too - or did he get some CBAs I missed?
Does having Sloane in the team mean that he takes ALL of those outliers for himself?
He got drafted off of playing mostly midfield/on ball as 2nd banana to Sam Walsh for the Geelong Falcons....
How much exposure to the midfield has he had for the Adelaide Crows?
Lachie Murphy got a shot as a train on player for our SANFL team off of a Northern Knights B & F in the then TAC Cup Comp playing exclusively midfield/on ball.
Yet very very limited exposure to midfield at either SANFL or AFL, in fact he got a rookie spot off of a stellar SANFL season playing as a small defender.
Out of curiosity, you wouldn't also have Murphy's pressure acts too ?You do realise pressure acts contribute to turnovers?
Jimmy needs to be kicking bags of goals because he's contributing buhger
You're the one deflecting, you want to bring Hamish into it when Neddy is playing the role the coaches have set for him, that's not Neddy's fault.
Like Murphy he should be getting midfield time when we need a change up, that's on the coaches.
The stats are all available on the AFL app for every player, every game including CBA's attended, goal assists, score involvements, pressure acts...the whole kit and caboodle.Out of curiosity, you wouldn't also have Murphy's pressure acts too ?
Indeed he is.Isn't Keays in the leadership group? He's not struggling
We should print some shirts with "We Never Ever Give Up" on them. Would suit us.Yes we never gave up davos44... that is one great trait we have built.
Huh?
Neddy played midfield/on ball mostly for the Geelong Falcons in his draft year and played midfield/forward for Vic Country at the Championships in his draft year (9.5 tackles a game a Championships high).
In his unnder-age year for the Geelong Falcons he played forward/midfield and at the Championships that year played 2 games mostly as a small forward.
At the very least he was drafted as midfielder/forward.
And yet you keep defending sloane/laird/keays/crouch and their midfield minutes/cb attendances..He got drafted off of playing mostly midfield/on ball as 2nd banana to Sam Walsh for the Geelong Falcons....
How much exposure to the midfield has he had for the Adelaide Crows?
Lachie Murphy got a shot as a train on player for our SANFL team off of a Northern Knights B & F in the then TAC Cup Comp playing exclusively midfield/on ball.
Yet very very limited exposure to midfield at either SANFL or AFL, in fact he got a rookie spot off of a stellar SANFL season playing as a small defender.
Yet so many people on this board wanted Sloane "he is the heart and soul of the club", even before Tex was captain. When Sloane resigned most here were thrilled. Remember it was at a time when us supporters were feeling miserable and some were depressed. It was at a time the club needed to have a victory and Sloanes signature was that victory. I agree right now its feels like we gave him too long a contract but thats easy to say in hindsight.
I cant believe the number of people on here who are pissed off at how we played. Be upset that we lost but hell I thought we played a good. We never game up, yes we made same errors but our disposal efficiency was around 72% which was as good as Brisbane's and the tackling pressure from Essendon was fierce....as was ours. I hate losing but our team played an exciting game today. The major plus's for me were:
Walker's return
Dawsons performance. He has been a major addition to the team. Listening to the commentators talking highly about one of players is refreshing.
Rachele is the other major inclusion. I liked what saw of Rachele in the 2nd half when it looked like he was playing further back towards the centre/wing. Whatever happened to our first round picks in 2016, 2017, 2019. Why didnt we get at least one player like Rachele in each of those drafts. At least we got something in 2018 with Ned and Jones but nothing like Rachele.
Gollant: I think he is going to be a major part of our future. He can take a mark which is something we have been missing. With another year and a bit more muscle he will be a permanent member of the team.
Keayes & Laird both played their hearts out
Butts gets the tough job every game. I see him has a big plus for us. Needs a bit more weight and muscle. He not as stocky as Rutten but I see him as our next Rutten.
Cook only had the last quarter but he had an impact and with more games he looks like he could develop into a dependable player.
I think there are some real positives. We won last week against a top four contender, we lost to Freo by one point and they are currently in the top four, We got our backs kicked by Collingwood and today we lost by 4 points. It isn't all bad...could be better but we aren't looking like fools.
It must drive Haggis mental.You'd have to ask the coaches but we seem to want to change quite a few players roles from what they were actually drafted as.
Here's Draft Central's Geelong Falcons preview of both Neddy and Sam Walsh leading into their draft year where they both played midfield ably assisted by under-ager Cooper Stephens.
Edward McHenry (Geelong Falcons) 176cm | 67kg | Outside Midfielder
2017 TAC Cup: (11) 21.7 disposals | 4.1 marks | 4.1 tackles | 1.9 clearances | 3.9 inside 50s | 60% KE | 72% DE | 31% CP
The classy outside midfielder McHenry is a smaller size and a light frame, but he moves well and is a great kick of the football. He spreads across the ground and lays his fair share of tackles, so expect him to up his numbers across the board in 2018 with a great role in the middle next year.
Sam Walsh (Geelong Falcons) 182cm | 68kg | Outside Midfielder
2017 TAC Cup: (13) 29.2 disposals | 4.5 marks | 4.5 tackles | 3.7 clearances | 4.8 inside 50s | 2.5 rebounds | 55% KE | 63% DE | 37% CP
One of the top prospects for 2018, Walsh is a complete midfielder who just ticks nearly every box. He can win it inside or out – played primarily outside in 2017 due to Worpel and Parish’s influence – can go forward and impact, or run off half-back. He wins clearances, pumps the ball forward and does all the defensive work. It is hard to fault his game and right now he’s a top five pick, certainly top 10.
Is it Nicksy making the decisions or is it the one constant that we’ve had at the club in the past few years since this “older guys over younger guys” selection/game strategy policy seems to have been the go to..That is interesting, one club plays the guy in his proper position and gets good results.
The other club shoe horns the guy in a position he struggles with cos the midfield is so stacked.
Bloody hell how many mids have we got waiting to have a crack in the MIDFIELD.
This is really pissing me off now, NICKS IS A CLUELESS MUPPET who is doing more harm than good.