Analysis Hawks 2022 Hypothetical trades (read the pinned post)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2
Firstly, the "No Kane Cornes" Rule is back




 
Last edited by a moderator:
have you been sitting there reading it over and over and deep thinking it?
Always Sunny Fx GIF
 
I think I misinterpreted R&L’s post. It’s not a salary dump.

We’ve got someone leaving and we’re paying salary to get a late first back, ontop of Tom also leaving.
Yeah thats what I thought .....trying to work out who
 
I think I misinterpreted R&L’s post. It’s not a salary dump.

We’ve got someone leaving and we’re paying salary to get a late first back, ontop of Tom also leaving.
Who on earth would we have on our list that is on enough money to justify a late first rounder if we pay? Chad?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

have you been sitting there reading it over and over and deep thinking it?
TylerDurden pointed it out to me, to be fair.

I read it as a salary dump from the Giants, but it seems like it might be the other way around. We’re willing to pay salary of one of our own to get a 1st rounder in.
 
I think I misinterpreted R&L’s post. It’s not a salary dump.

We’ve got someone leaving and we’re paying salary to get a late first back, ontop of Tom also leaving.
Can't think of a player that I'd want to lose that could realistically bring in a late 1st, even with salary paid. Other than Mitchell.

Probably include our Pick 24 as an outgoing, I guess?
 
Can't think of a player that I'd want to lose that could realistically bring in a late 1st, even with salary paid. Other than Mitchell.

Probably include our Pick 24 as an outgoing, I guess?
All I can think of on our list that would warrant that (and that we would agree to trading) is TOM, JOM or Chad, although the latter two seem to want to stay.
 
I think I misinterpreted R&L’s post. It’s not a salary dump.

We’ve got someone leaving and we’re paying salary to get a late first back, ontop of Tom also leaving.
You could interpret it both ways tbh

“Late r 1 and salary paid”
 
All I can think of on our list that would warrant that (and that we would agree to trading) is TOM, JOM or Chad, although the latter two seem to want to stay.
Tom’s going to pies already in R&L’s post.

So it reads like one of the others thats possibly on the way out.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

All I can think of on our list that would warrant that (and that we would agree to trading) is TOM, JOM or Chad, although the latter two seem to want to stay.
Yeah, thinking the same & I really dislike both options.
 
Can't think of a player that I'd want to lose that could realistically bring in a late 1st, even with salary paid. Other than Mitchell.

Probably include our Pick 24 as an outgoing, I guess?
Maybe chad? Think would unlikely to be JOM. Can’t think of anyone else with a decent salary. Maybe north gets a late 1st as part of mega deal?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top