Isaac Quaynor injury

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

That clean a cut seems extremely unlikely to have been caused by a metal stud.

I remember in high school I would play rugby in the morning - where metal studs where actually mandated - then have to change out for synthetic studs for soccer in the afternoon.

The synthetic studs ALWAYS had sharper edges but this was back in the 90s so I'm sure materials have changed a fair bit.

Someone had a box cutter on the field and used it on him just before that play?
 
If it's not a banned boot which seems to be the case, for a senior coach to come out and accuse a first game player of cheating is unprofessional and a real shithouse act. Then when called out shrugs his shoulders and says I got told by players they were bad. Nothing would make me happier than seeing this arrogant piece of sh*t end his career with not a Grand Final win to his name.

And if it is a banned boot, what penalty?
 
Because there is no way studs with minimal contact could cause a deep clean cut like that especially as his leg drags across the ground for a few seconds.

Its pretty obvious.

What are you basing this on? I've seen similar injuries a fair few times in Soccer after seemingly minimal contact was made with an opponents studs.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)


Haha, that made me laugh.

After Clarkson and now Buckley copping it for what they’ve said in press conferences, do we can those going forward or just ask that coaches only answer in football cliches?

“Nah, Quaynor will be out for a few weeks but then he will be cherry ripe and we will take it one week at a time”.
 
Collingwood player cops an horrific injury and there are the usual idiots taking pot shots at Buckley.

Never change, main board. Never change.
The pile on in here is hilariously predicable tbh.

17 other senior coaches would be questioning it in the same way if the same incident had happened to one of their players and rightfully so. I'm not even a Buckley fan boy but the vendetta that is going on here is painfully obvious
 
Okay.

Buckley didn't say it was metal studs, he said it could have been, which it could have been. Nothing wrong there.

It appears they're hybrids. These are a grey area. AFL will send a notice out to ban these moving forward and nobody should be punished.

Move on, it was an accident. Buckley is well within his rights to be frustrated but even in being so, he didn't start a witch hunt.
 
Collingwood player cops an horrific injury and there are the usual idiots taking pot shots at Buckley.

Never change, main board. Never change.
Likewise, people suggest the merest possibility that there might be an alternate explanation and the Pies fans' persecution complex goes into overdrive.
 
What are you basing this on? I've seen similar injuries a fair few times in Soccer after seemingly minimal contact was made with an opponents studs.
When I played soccer metal studs and plastic studs were both allowed. The issue, and why referees inspected boots before the game, was whether the studs were worn or damaged in any way. It wasn’t the fact that a stud was metal that was a problem, it was whether it was worn and jagged (and therefore sharp) that was the problem.
 
How could metal studs slice so clean and deep? Im not familiar with them but is this type of injury not unheard of where they are more commonplace?

I cant see how these could do that damage:

images.jpeg

Those golf shoes sure. But youd have to file the footy ones down. I hope theres a full investigation and Quaynor is financially compensated for missed match payments and pain/suffering by the right people. Be that the Swans, the GABBA, or whoever. Shocking. Hope he recovers quickly and fully.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Isaac Quaynor injury

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top