Player Watch Jordan De Goey

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

St Kevin's is perched precariously on the edge of Toorak - it's almost on the freeway. Most unlikely that any Catholic boys in Toorak (there's a couple) attend St Kevin's. These lads catch the tram outside the Purple Fig up Glenferrie Rd to Xavier.

St Kevin's kids descend on Toorak from various suburbs strewn along the Glen Waverley line - their parents trying to buy a fragment of prestige for their kids as they jostle for status and lifestyle.

Cutting prose grammar Nazi. ;)
 
Of course, it's a fn beat-up but it's an albatross around the club's neck.

As a due-diligence exercise the club will be obliged to establish facts. All this media coverage means that they have to understand any legal risks and mitigate the PR fallout.

It's extra work the club has to do; work that wasn't there last week.
I would have thought the only legal risk would be if they take action against Jordy.
 
St Kevin's is perched precariously on the edge of Toorak - it's almost on the freeway. Most unlikely that any Catholic boys in Toorak (there's a couple) attend St Kevin's. These lads catch the tram outside the Purple Fig up Glenferrie Rd to Xavier.

St Kevin's kids descend on Toorak from various suburbs strewn along the Glen Waverley line - their parents trying to buy a fragment of prestige for their kids as they jostle for status and lifestyle.
That was like reading poetry. Hats off, a perfect description.
 
I’ll check the earlier analysis but no way is that Degoey’s arm. Further to the point, why would degoey come out and explicitly say it wasn't his arm? His statement was enough.
I think you should check out the earlier analysis. Barely anyone else in here is any longer claiming that the arm is attached to anyone but DG. In any case, if the girl is his current partner, it seems more desirable for the arm to be his rather than that of some other unknown male.
 
I can see where you are coming from but for me that would be outrageous. Its not the AFLs right to chase up a non event like this where no complaint has been made. If they are contacted, assuming the women have no issue with the night, i would hope they would tell the AFL to MYOBB. It would be an employer way overstepping their role
I do agree with that, however unfortunately due to the media histrionics the AFL and/or the club will have to address it (showing how the media in the rush to show they have respect for women they have actually been disrespectful to these two women).
 
I think you should check out the earlier analysis. Barely anyone else in here is any longer claiming that the arm is attached to anyone but DG. In any case, if the girl is his current partner, it seems more desirable for the arm to be his rather than that of some other unknown male.
The photo forensic work on this site is unquestionable - nailing player heights and growth spurts again and again.
 
I think you should check out the earlier analysis. Barely anyone else in here is any longer claiming that the arm is attached to anyone but DG. In any case, if the girl is his current partner, it seems more desirable for the arm to be his rather than that of some other unknown male.
I reckon if i tried to rip my missus top off in a pub id get the Jake Melksham treatment from her
 
If there was 3 things Jordy should of thought "Id better not do" on this mid season break id say going overseas, going clubbing and fimling it and having any contact with women on camera would make the list.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I would have thought the only legal risk would be if they take action against Jordy.

I assume the club would need to understand Jordy's legal exposure i.e. the likelihood of any action. It might be a 2 minute chat, might not.

There is also a "statement" required given the club has stated they are investigating. They have to clarify their position on the matter.

I'm sure nobody at the club enjoys this work.
 
Last edited:
Agree. Until Jordy talks to the Club & explains what did & didn't happen, this is all hot air.

Yes and no. I doubt there’ll be any significant sanctions leveled against JDG but what was caught on film, specifically the simulated oral sex actions, leave him open to the ridicule he’s currently under. Some will find it offensive and not something that should be made for public consumption. I think at a minimum, he’ll be looking at doing some programs about respect for women.
 
I assume the club's would need to understand Jordy's legal exposure i.e. the likelihood of any action. It might be a 2 minute chat, might not.

There is also a "statement" required given the club has stated they are investigating. They have to clarify their position on the matter.

I'm sure nobody at the club enjoys this work.
It's a footy club - not a personality rehabilitation clinic.
 
Yes and no. I doubt there’ll be any significant sanctions leveled against JDG but what was caught on film, specifically the simulated oral sex actions, leave him open to the ridicule he’s currently under. Some will find it offensive and not something that should be made for public consumption. I think at a minimum, he’ll be looking at doing some programs about respect for women.
How do you know what the woman was doing or had done? Why is there always a presumption that Degoey has done the wrong thing? Haven't people learned from the last media beat up?

The media are beneath contempt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top