List Mgmt. List Management 2024-25

[longdonkey]

Are we saying the same for Pendlebury, or Sidebottom etc. He has earned the right to call his time.

I agree with that too - I wouldn't be keen on delisting him though.

 

[Peninsula Boy]

View attachment 2146935

Buttkiss means nothing, you Millennial Gen Zer.

 

[Waspy79]

It wouldn't have been Houstons defence, the club and its lawyer would have been entirely responsible.

He gave his own testimony and it was embarrassing. I agree though that the obvious lack of coaching from club lawyer as to what Houston should have said is yet another stain on the place.

 

[Coobk001]

Disagree strongly, kid has x factor, unfortunately injury ridden. Would of loved to see him get a chance.

Jackson can't kick. He won't make it. I would delist and move to rookie spot. If he was uncontracted I would delist.

 

[Brian McGee]

Just about everyone who has any information on this trade has said taking on Ratkins salary netted us 29.

Do you really think we got him for his footballing ability? Christ

I thought that the story was the salary dump got our two later picks upgraded. 58 to 50 and 39 to 36.

 

[Scodges]

Our young players would look a lot better if they were allowed in the gym.

Yeah 100% agree.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[all seeing eye]

Jackson can't kick. He won't make it. I would delist and move to rookie spot. If he was uncontracted I would delist.

I must be watching wrong sanfl games, his left foot is pretty good.

 

[Scodges]

]" data-quote="RangaInTeal" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">

Yeah, nahhhh…

His movement through traffic is Elite!

I’d persist with Jackson, see what an injury free season looks like. Recon he’ll surprise a few.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[dirty2]

Jackson showed alot of promise the year he got a solid run with no injuries.. was that last year... Or year before.

Think the kid has talent... But always bloody injured.

 

[Watto71]

Narkle Evans McEntee Boak should all be out the door for 25 however 2 will remain.
Finlayson has another season I believe due to real life circumstances.
This would of given us 5 spots on our list if our club had balls

 

[Duck Farmer]

It wouldn't have been Houstons defence, the club and its lawyer would have been entirely responsible.

Collingwood can probably afford a lawyer who doesn't do his case prep at the Bunnings paint department.

 

[Launchpad McQuack]

Buttkiss means nothing, you Millennial Gen Zer.

I think you mean bupkis or bubkes.

 

[agmsy]

I'd love to hear his reasoning for going on.

I imagine it's pretty simple: he still wants to play.

There are plenty of jobs he could walk into next year, if he wanted to. Those jobs will all still be there in 2026 and beyond.

On the other hand, tautologically, his last year as a professional footballer in the AFL will be his last year as a professional footballer in the AFL. The job's there for 2025. Playing in 2025 means there's some (slim?) chance he can play in 2026, but that'll be it. If he retired tomorrow, that'd be it, too.

The guy who's always said he wants to play AFL for as long as he can is doing exactly that.

 

[n4nirvana]

Would love to see Josh Sinn have an uninterrupted, no injury pre-season and season.

 

[Addy23]

We don't have any list positions left for someone like DGB.

Fascinating to see what happens with our delistings. Looks like we'll only take 4 picks to the draft, and that's if we basically delist everyone who is uncontracted.

Given it is supposed to be a great draft, we have no first next year and next year is supposed to be crap, it seems crazy to be thinking we will delist so many players next year.

Gotta think there might be some surprise delistings beyond Scully, K Marshall, Evans and Narkle.

Let's put it this way, there's more draftees I'd have from the 2024 crop than some of the players on our list

McKenzie, Dixon, Houston, McCallum replaced by Richards, Luko, Atkins and SPP (back on the active list)

So if we were to take 4 draftees (assuming not inclusive of Barrett and Rome), I think the delistings will be Scully, FEvans and Kyle Marshall from the senior list. This opens up 3 spots. I suspect that Clurey gets delisted to be re-rookied. So that's 4 senior spots opened for the 4 picks.

Let's assume Barrett goes in the ND and Burgoyne goes in rookie draft. We need another senior spot and a rookie spot. I think we'll delist Jackson and re-rookied him as well to open up the 5th spot for Barrett. To accommodate these 2 re-rookies as well as Burgoyne, I assume we delist Narkle, McEntee and Williams

Best scenario is Barrett gets to rookie draft in which cause we can keep him as Cat B and save 1 of the re-rookies. And if Burgoyne gets to rookie as well then we need to cut only 2 rookies, which I hope is Narkle and Jed

 

[rignanv]

I wonder if there's a chance Marshall retirees between now and the draft

 

[pastmyprimus]

I thought our forward line was our Achilles heel in the finals with a cooked Dixon and a rotation among 3 sanfl standard small forwards, McEntee, Evans and Narkle.

Our forward line looks better on paper with Lukosius and Richards coming in. Let’s see how that translates next season