Roast Media Shakes Head, Part 8

Remove this Banner Ad

I know this isn't the point, but I do find it hilarious how any time anybody says anything about the tingles we always have to preface it with "if you ignore the times they got to play against us"

Mmmm. They celebrate the news of each Hinkley extension like Christmas for a reason.

2065515F-4C2B-4676-89A9-80BC900B57CB.jpeg

They could pick a back six of amateur leaguers with Quentin Kenihan in ruck and we’d find a way to look like this when the final siren sounds.
 
Mmmm. They celebrate the news of each Hinkley extension like Christmas for a reason.

View attachment 1910609

They could pick a back six of amateur leaguers with Quentin Kenihan in ruck and we’d find a way to look like this when the final siren sounds.
anyone who ever tried sharing a footpath with Quentin could attest that he showed far more aggression and intensity than any of our players have shown in a showdown for about a decade
 

Log in to remove this ad.

anyone who ever tried sharing a footpath with Quentin could attest that he showed far more aggression and intensity than any of our players have shown in a showdown for about a decade
Hahahaha - I was just about to say that little prick ran over my foot so he was placed on the naughty list with Crowey who used to steal my park.
 
I actually think michaelanney is their best young player and don’t think it’s unreasonable having him ahead of Bergman.

The hype around thilthorp and Rechelle massively outweighs their actual output.
It's a standard yearly pump up the Crows tyres. Still remember when the guy they got for Dangerfield was going to be the new Dangerfield.

Waiting for the "our best 22 is as good as any in the comp" story.
 
Bickley has been calling out the Crows s**t recruiting for ages, I'm sorry but he's not a Crow sycophant or a Port Basher.
And Rowe has been calling out the Crows poor player development for years. And he is still both those things.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

But why does he have to be such a flog?
Talking to a mate the other day... Known him for 25+ years....

He actually shocked me... Was always a crows supporter. But he has got to know some or the port boys lately Marshall and a few others and reckons they are all top blokes compared to some of the crows guys he has spoken to (thought they were w***ers) and is now leaning towards ports as his team.
 
And so it begins.

Is this headline really necessary:think:

View attachment 1912050

If it had been one of the Crows players or officials (or commentators) saying it then fair enough, but to quote from some nuffy's tweet in a headline is a new low, even for Newscorpse.
 
I am still shaking my head at that Kayo coverage from yesterday. The commentary was terrible and the camerawork poor. Classic example, at the centre bounce Sweet has his run at the ball impeded by the Crow ruckman who is not making the ball his object. The commentator says, 'I do not know what that free was for' followed by 'I cannot help you there'. it6 was bloody obvious what the free was for. Then later in the quarter Rioli almost has his head pulled off yet the Kayo commentator calls it a 'great tackle' but has to backtrack when he sees the replay. Awful commentary from two guys who wanted to share private jokes rather than focus on the task at hand.

Someone should tell the Kayo producers that we have four quarters in Aussie rules not four periods. Obviously FOXTEL are attempting to save money by taking this third rate feed. I do not subscribe to Kayo so please help me out. Is the commentary usually that bad and who where those commentators?
 
I am still shaking my head at that Kayo coverage from yesterday. The commentary was terrible and the camerawork poor. Classic example, at the centre bounce Sweet has his run at the ball impeded by the Crow ruckman who is not making the ball his object. The commentator says, 'I do not know what that free was for' followed by 'I cannot help you there'. it6 was bloody obvious what the free was for. Then later in the quarter Rioli almost has his head pulled off yet the Kayo commentator calls it a 'great tackle' but has to backtrack when he sees the replay. Awful commentary from two guys who wanted to share private jokes rather than focus on the task at hand.

Someone should tell the Kayo producers that we have four quarters in Aussie rules not four periods. Obviously FOXTEL are attempting to save money by taking this third rate feed. I do not subscribe to Kayo so please help me out. Is the commentary usually that bad and who where those commentators?
I think it was Dominic Cassisi on special comments lol
 
I am still shaking my head at that Kayo coverage from yesterday. The commentary was terrible and the camerawork poor. Classic example, at the centre bounce Sweet has his run at the ball impeded by the Crow ruckman who is not making the ball his object. The commentator says, 'I do not know what that free was for' followed by 'I cannot help you there'. it6 was bloody obvious what the free was for. Then later in the quarter Rioli almost has his head pulled off yet the Kayo commentator calls it a 'great tackle' but has to backtrack when he sees the replay. Awful commentary from two guys who wanted to share private jokes rather than focus on the task at hand.

Someone should tell the Kayo producers that we have four quarters in Aussie rules not four periods. Obviously FOXTEL are attempting to save money by taking this third rate feed. I do not subscribe to Kayo so please help me out. Is the commentary usually that bad and who where those commentators?
What are you expecting for a unofficial practice match?

And someone who watched the match would know the game went for six periods and not four quarters.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Roast Media Shakes Head, Part 8

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top