- Moderator
- #251
Not sure why you are going on about this - you seem to be looking for an argument that's not there.
I merely asked on what basis you claimed "The Melbourne-Hawthorn merger was seen very much like the Brisbane-Fitzroy merger, it was a takeover."
I said that the Brisbane-Fitzroy 'merger' and what was going to be the Melbourne-Hawthorn merger were nothing alike.
You disputed that.
Maybe go wind yourself up and sook about Fitzroy not existing somewhere else, because I'm not interested.
It was you who compared the two...not me. Then you asked "Maybe you tell me why they were different if you are the expert.
So I pointed you to a couple of previous explanations I've made.