I was just dreaming. Just dreaming.Given the noise coming out of the club I don't think we've upped our offer.
This noise sounds like it's coming out of the AFL to prime the bed for the first round pick as a pity fu** for a screwed club.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I was just dreaming. Just dreaming.Given the noise coming out of the club I don't think we've upped our offer.
This noise sounds like it's coming out of the AFL to prime the bed for the first round pick as a pity fu** for a screwed club.
Thanks for referring me back 400 posts when I am pretty sure you've moved your position more times than the karma sutra.Done it already. See post #537 18Oct20 on p22 of this thread.
No equivocating. No flip flopping. I've been saying the same things for about 2 wks ie Brisbane should do it the easy way, make an offer that gets band 1 either by converting incentive $ to base $, or offering a shorter term at a higher rate with later yrs at a lower rate with easy triggers. If not, Essendon should match and risk the consequences. I'm very sure there's been no flopping about.
AFL wants big Vic Clubs going for finals.Given the noise coming out of the club I don't think we've upped our offer.
This noise sounds like it's coming out of the AFL to prime the bed for the first round pick as a pity fu** for a screwed club.
Done it already. See post #537 18Oct20 on p22 of this thread.
No equivocating. No flip flopping. I've been saying the same things for about 2 wks ie Brisbane should do it the easy way, make an offer that gets band 1 either by converting incentive $ to base $, or offering a shorter term at a higher rate with later yrs at a lower rate with easy triggers. If not, Essendon should match and risk the consequences. I'm very sure there's been no flopping about.
This is your brain.
View attachment 997961
This is your brain on Dodoro.
View attachment 997962
Not even once.
Thought our offer was around the 600k, reports now suggesting it is around the 700k. Did we actually up our offer?
Would agree that there's little doubt the AFL have found a way to give the Bombers a band 1 comp pick and our offer has remained the same. This is the best possible outcome for both teams. Thank you corrupt AFL. The teams who have picks after pick 7 will be the ones with the most to whinge about.
They really seem to stomp out any type of colluding to generate that outcome too. We’ve already seen the push back from the talk of the Dunstan salary dump to increase Crouch’s wage. As usual Noble played the situation perfect, by not getting wrapped up in any media about upping our offer to generate that outcome.
You would think with upgrades to some Lions players this year or next, and Harris signing a big deal and with Daniher that there could be some squeeze on salary space and some posters have mentioned Adams on around $400 +K per year with still two years to go, so could see it is possible.Last trade of trade period... Marcus Adamsand his salary to Essendon for a late fourth rounder.PLAYERCARDSTART24Marcus Adams
- Age
- 31
- Ht
- 192cm
- Wt
- 98kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 13.8
- 4star
- K
- 8.1
- 3star
- HB
- 5.7
- 4star
- M
- 5.6
- 5star
- T
- 2.0
- 4star
- MG
- 240.5
- 4star
- D
- 5.0
- 1star
- K
- 2.0
- 1star
- HB
- 3.0
- 2star
- M
- 1.0
- 1star
- T
- 0.0
- 1star
- MG
- 57.0
- 1star
- D
- 15.8
- 4star
- K
- 9.0
- 4star
- HB
- 6.8
- 5star
- M
- 6.8
- 5star
- T
- 2.0
- 4star
- MG
- 235.8
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
Bombers need some KPP depth down back.
Thanks for referring me back 400 posts when I am pretty sure you've moved your position more times than the karma sutra.
In your post you actually agree that our offer is fair so I am really confused why you believe we should increase to make you happy. Free agency compensation is never meant to fully compensate the losing club.
That you believe Daniher is worth a band 1 contract shows the ridiculousness of your position. If he'd played a full season and kicked 35 goals then we'd all agree with you. The fact is he has played 15 games in 3 seasons and has wanted to escape your culturally sh*te club for 2 years.
Essendon have no leverage in this case.
Thought our offer was around the 600k, reports now suggesting it is around the 700k. Did we actually up our offer?
Heresy.