New Zealand vs England

Remove this Banner Ad

How is kicking the ball to boundary against the spirit of cricket but not running when the ball is hit near the boundary is within it?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

How is kicking the ball to boundary against the spirit of cricket but not running when the ball is hit near the boundary is within it?

If you don't run then it is to your own teams detriment and within your own power. Kicking the ball is inflicting a result on the opponent in which they didn't intend. Silly statement.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

In all seriousness, New Zealand Cricket is looking up. They have 2 really good opening bowlers (Boult, Southee), a guy who reverses the pill really well (Wagner) and Bracewell, who is a pretty good cricketer. Then they've got Martin as a left arm orthodox spinner who looks like he could form a good spin twin duo with Williamson.

Now how to fit D. Vettori back into that test side... probably drop Martin and stick him in at 8. This is really hard
 
If you don't run then it is to your own teams detriment and within your own power. Kicking the ball is inflicting a result on the opponent in which they didn't intend. Silly statement.

You can argue from the other viewpoint too. Kicking a ball is to the teams detriment because you gave away 4 runs instead of 1 or 2.

And, this is "spirit of cricket" we are talking about. The context plays a huge role too. In this context, the run would have made a huge difference.
 
I had resigned to losing the series this morning, but enormously proud of the fight to save the test match and series.

Well done to New Zealand who clearly had the moral victory.

I love Test cricket.
 
You can argue from the other viewpoint too. Kicking a ball is to the teams detriment because you gave away 4 runs instead of 1 or 2.

And, this is "spirit of cricket" we are talking about. The context plays a huge role too. In this context, the run would have made a huge difference.

No, there's really no two ways about it. Kicking the ball has the potential to directly influence the result of a tight match. The batsman choosing not to run is well within their rights. It happens in every single game when trying to keep the strike. And don't be silly, the ball went out near the boundary. If they chose to run, they would have dawdled through for two comfortably. What's the point when you're 200 runs behind with a couple of balls remaining :rolleyes:.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

New Zealand vs England

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top