- Thread starter
- Banned
- #176
I'm not sure what we are disagreeing on.
?
You stated we threw away our picks.
I dont agree, 2nd round picks in this draft are valuable, its just Tamb and Jacobs are more valuable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I'm not sure what we are disagreeing on.
?
Add this this fact that he captained the Australian U16's cricket team. This demonstrates his ability and desire to become a leader.Which AFL player do you feel you resemble and why?
I really like Luke Hodge’s ability to play as a forward, through the midfield and as a defender. My goal would be to emulate his game, and his leadership qualities.
For those that haven't seen it, here is George Horlin-Smith's draft profile. This part impressed me the most:
Add this this fact that he captained the Australian U16's cricket team. This demonstrates his ability and desire to become a leader.
If you can watch the video, check out his non-preferred pass, across the face of goals to a target at 0:13. A strong mark on a lead at 0:44 His ability to hit a running target through the centre of the ground at 1:05. He does have a shocker on the run at 1:40 though.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/102185/default.aspx
It will be interesting to see what will transpire as there is still some time before draft day and a lot change leading up to it, as we have seen in the past.
ALso just wanted to mention that since Rendell took over the possible players we would have taken 1st round if the players we picked werent there. In some ways we have been very lucky:
-If Danger wasnt avail next on our list was Ebert/Rance: Difference between these players is enormous;
-If Davis wasnt avail would have ended up with Johnstone: Always injured and really plays similar to Walker.
-If Talia not avail would have ended up with Stevens: Again huge diff;
So ended up with Danger/Davis/Talia all guns. But very well could have been:Ebert or Rance/Johnstone/Stevens.
I wonder how we would have viewed Rendell and his recruiting team if with just a little less luck we ended up with the latter 3 players?
Davis was proven. Rendell wanted him 2 years before we drafted him. He played on Watts and killed him, and played reserves for NA and would have played league footy if he didnt get injured.
HS has only played 3 games in U18s, hasnt done a pre-season which is a worry as to how he will be able to hadle it.
Whereas someone like SMith is alot more of a certainty to succeed.
Should be interesting to see what happens.
Just seems like he has too many ?????? for pick 14.
Would you take him ahead of Smith/Pitt/Smetdes?
Its interesting, Danger we rated 2 along with Geelong, yet most rated him 15-25. Same as Davis. I think our recruiting has been proved correct.
Gunston was more a smokey i think, as Rendell stated we expected to get him with 3rd round and Menzel/Howard with 2nd rounder.
Last years rankings for realistic targets were:
Moore;Talia;Melksh;Stevens;Butch;Black;Menzel;Howard;Gunston;JMP
Apparently we went into draft thinking we would end up with Koby Stevens, but on the day before draft we heard rumors that Melb and Carlt didnt want Talia, so we had a feeling Talia would be picked at 13.
Stevens though has injury issues and his speed/Kicking are big issues.
Gun inside player similar to Thompson/VanBerlo, really didnt need that type of player. Lucky we got Talia. Perfect for us.[/quote]
as a matter of interest, where do you see Talia playing?
You stated we threw away our picks.
I dont agree, 2nd round picks in this draft are valuable, its just Tamb and Jacobs are more valuable.
Its interesting, Danger we rated 2 along with Geelong, yet most rated him 15-25. Same as Davis. I think our recruiting has been proved correct.
Gunston was more a smokey i think, as Rendell stated we expected to get him with 3rd round and Menzel/Howard with 2nd rounder.
Last years rankings for realistic targets were:
Moore;Talia;Melksh;Stevens;Butch;Black;Menzel;Howard;Gunston;JMP
Apparently we went into draft thinking we would end up with Koby Stevens, but on the day before draft we heard rumors that Melb and Carlt didnt want Talia, so we had a feeling Talia would be picked at 13.
Stevens though has injury issues and his speed/Kicking are big issues.
Gun inside player similar to Thompson/VanBerlo, really didnt need that type of player. Lucky we got Talia. Perfect for us.[/quote]
as a matter of interest, where do you see Talia playing?
Ryan Griffen.
Ryan Griffen.
Cripes! I hope you are right. He has 6cm and 7kgs on him.
Cripes! I hope you are right. He has 6cm and 7kgs on him.
Remember Rendell saying he can see him play as a wingman. He also quite correctly said he can see ruckman being 195cm mobile type players. Does that mean in the future wingman are going to be taller than ruckman?
I wouldn't be against the club drafting George Horlin Smith instead of Brodie Smith.
Whilst I'd be happy with Brodie at our club he is an inside midfielder (with good leg speed) and we want and need quality a outside midfielder which what George is.
For those that haven't seen it, here is George Horlin-Smith's draft profile. This part impressed me the most:
Add this this fact that he captained the Australian U16's cricket team. This demonstrates his ability and desire to become a leader.
If you can watch the video, check out his non-preferred pass, across the face of goals to a target at 0:13. A strong mark on a lead at 0:44 His ability to hit a running target through the centre of the ground at 1:05. He does have a shocker on the run at 1:40 though.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/102185/default.aspx
It will be interesting to see what will transpire as there is still some time before draft day and a lot change leading up to it, as we have seen in the past.
I wouldn't be against the club drafting George Horlin Smith instead of Brodie Smith.
Whilst I'd be happy with Brodie at our club he is an inside midfielder (with good leg speed) and we want and need quality a outside midfielder which what George is.
Get GEORGE!
Pick 14 is the only chance.
After that he will be gone.
Elite sports training for 2 years already, leader, and doesn't he kick just a bit like Nathan Buckley?
Not gun pace, but is just so Bernie Vince. No complaint here if his name is alled by MR.
And I bet the players we 'could' of ended up with would of been better players had they played for Adelaide as I rate our player development as second best behind Collingwood.
You don't have 12 recruiters going to a school game if you have nothing. Imagine if he does do a pre-season though, he could be anything.
He was BOG in one of the game as well. I know its only u18s but i can see him being a really good player in the future.
Its interesting, Danger we rated 2 along with Geelong, yet most rated him 15-25. Same as Davis. I think our recruiting has been proved correct.
Gunston was more a smokey i think, as Rendell stated we expected to get him with 3rd round and Menzel/Howard with 2nd rounder.
Last years rankings for realistic targets were:
Moore;Talia;Melksh;Stevens;Butch;Black;Menzel;Howard;Gunston;JMP
Apparently we went into draft thinking we would end up with Koby Stevens, but on the day before draft we heard rumors that Melb and Carlt didnt want Talia, so we had a feeling Talia would be picked at 13.
Stevens though has injury issues and his speed/Kicking are big issues.
Gun inside player similar to Thompson/VanBerlo, really didnt need that type of player. Lucky we got Talia. Perfect for us.[/quote]
as a matter of interest, where do you see Talia playing?
Attacking CHB or HBF/Winger.
Apparently he wants to play forward but the club see him as a defender.
I would love to see our wingers being Hendo/Gunston/Talia. Very Tall wingers are so hard to man up on eg Matty Richardson and can be so damaging.
Get GEORGE!
Pick 14 is the only chance.
After that he will be gone.
Elite sports training for 2 years already, leader, and doesn't he kick just a bit like Nathan Buckley?
Not gun pace, but is just so Bernie Vince. No complaint here if his name is alled by MR.
I don't get all the G H-S love at all.
I watched a bit of school football and can't see what the fuss is about. I saw Pembroke play against St. Peter's and the stand out player wasn't G H-S, but rather his opponent who was easily BOG.
I'm hoping we pick this kid up instead (Rendell knows who he is!)
Whose the player.
Is he a chance at 61 or more likely around 14?
I'm actually hoping around pick 61 or in the rookie draft. His name is Patrick Barrett. I've seen a fair bit of him this year and he has a lot to like. About 6 foot 2, has break away pace, tough as nails and outstanding above his head.
The last bit is one of his problems as when he played for Westies, he was used as a marking forward rather than in the midfield where he is suited.
I liken him in game style (not talent) to a mix between Danger and Vince.
Bris and WB have looked at him during the year.
Didn't MR say during trade week that he was hoping to get a higher pick from Fremantle in the Griffin trade because he had someone in mind, but that pick 61 might still be enough? If so then a lesser known player like Barrett may be who he is thinking of.