Autopsy Official NAB Cup RD1 v Melbourne & North

Remove this Banner Ad

Looks like us and north played a close to full strength side against Melbourne (minus injured players) ... No reason why we cant beat them in the second game, lets see what the kids/depth is like.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

not that other matters but o would have been pissed if Melbourne beat us regardless what side we had in. good signs looked reasonably sharp. foot skills were great. backline looks solid, add grimes and it could become exceptional. i tipped us to win one and lose one so im expecting a different side to run out against north
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Looks like us and north played a close to full strength side against Melbourne (minus injured players) ... No reason why we cant beat them in the second game, lets see what the kids/depth is like.


would have liked some of our players conserve a bit more energy late in the game. ie Cotch not be so agressive on the wing when the game in hand and game 2 coming up
 
Positives were:

Thought Vlastin looked good when he was involved.

Vickery presented well and is very agile

Jack was up and about

Ellis looked good

Nahas worked hard for not much reward

Better players had dirty nights

Thought Astbury competed well at CHb

Negatives

No point in Vickery being tough when he lay on the ground after the Frawley RIEWOLDT contest for minor contact. Needed to bounce back up because he could of been involved in the play. The other pointless push and shove in a nab cup is stupid.

Jacksons kicking has not changed

Goal kicking
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy Official NAB Cup RD1 v Melbourne & North

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top