Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Iāve heard a few people suggest this. It would mean that if a player was actually hit in the head - like Arch near the end - they would be out of the game for an enforced 20 minutes. That would in turn lead to more players being deliberately hit to remove threats. Remember the umpire at the time thought it was an actual head knock. It only works if there is an immediate independent assessment that can say for sure if the player staged, and I doubt thatās possible.Too many posts here to read through and its probably been mentioned but what a dog act on the part of Stephen May to fake that head knock and suck the umpire in.
The umpire was incompetent in the first place that he had not already blown the whistle, called holding the ball and a free to Eddie Ford. That incident alone might have cost us the game.
Anyway the bit I really wanted to post here is that once again, Will Schofield showed how good a commentator he is. His call on the incident was to say that when players put their hands up to to their head in a tackling incident, they should have to go off the ground and go through the mandatory concussion protocols. That would fix that form of staging in a heartbeat.
Sincere apologies to anyone else who has already posted this here.
Agree. Players will game the system to exploit the loopholes to their advantage. Like players faking a head knock to draw a free kick. May's not the only one to do this.Iāve heard a few people suggest this. It would mean that if a player was actually hit in the head - like Arch near the end - they would be out of the game for an enforced 20 minutes. That would in turn lead to more players being deliberately hit to remove threats. Remember the umpire at the time thought it was an actual head knock. It only works if there is an immediate independent assessment that can say for sure if the player staged, and I doubt thatās possible.
Iāve heard a few people suggest this. It would mean that if a player was actually hit in the head - like Arch near the end - they would be out of the game for an enforced 20 minutes. That would in turn lead to more players being deliberately hit to remove threats. Remember the umpire at the time thought it was an actual head knock. It only works if there is an immediate independent assessment that can say for sure if the player staged, and I doubt thatās possible.
Either way, if thatās the rule, we lose Arch for the last eight minutes of the game or whatever it was. Not a good idea.It would only apply when a player stages for a free after being tackled to the ground. I don't think there are too many players nowadays who deliberately hit other players in the head, because there are so many cameras and so many different angles that the MRP can look at an incident in a marking contest.
These are the most likely sources of a deliberate hit to the head, which would then lead to a suspension. The old days of an "ear massage", as funny as we might have once thought, are thankfully well and truly over.
We should not rule out getting rid of the acts of cheats, which is what May is, just because there might be other issues arise.
Also, as I understand it; and I may well be wrong on this; but doesn't the team doctor have to go out and assess any such head hit where the player stays down? The fact that May got straight up after the free was paid, gave him away.
Concussion is a huge issue in our game at the present and players faking head hits is just totally unacceptable. If players think this is a way to get an unfair advantage, then there has to be some sort of sanction.
At the very least in situations like this, he should have been immediately sent off the ground to have some concussioin assessment, before he returned to the game.
Either way, if thatās the rule, we lose Arch for the last eight minutes of the game or whatever it was. Not a good idea.
I reckon I might have been standing beside him at the āG! However, it just goes to show how absolutely impossible it is for umpires to ever satisfy us punters. North supporters firmly believe we were robbed by the umpires, AFL and the media every week. On the other hand, opposition supporters feel the exact opposite. Go figure.So today I wandered into the local store run by the doomsaying GoDees fans Iāve mentioned.
āWere you a tad nervous as we stormed home?ā I asked.
āBloody hell, those umpires were atrocious. They may as well have been wearing North jumpers. You guys got everything, 50/50ās, the lot. It was a bloody disgrace. I was waiting for one of them to blow the whistle as you headed forward in the finish and end up taking the shot from the goal line on your behalf. Talk about an armchair ride!ā He replied.
I pictured him leading the MCC Boo Boys throughout the final quarter North charge.
He even justified the dangerous tackle decision awarded to May ffs. āFrom the view the umpire had it must have looked dangerous!ā
āMate, fā offā I replied with a smile, ācongrats on the win!ā
I actually thought heād be more balanced and praise our youngsters or whatever but nup.
Theyāre a different breed, especially those who couldnāt lie their way to WA as our state was in lockdown to see the GF win.
North got gifted two goals in the run home. Iām not sorry.So today I wandered into the local store run by the doomsaying GoDees fans Iāve mentioned.
āWere you a tad nervous as we stormed home?ā I asked.
āBloody hell, those umpires were atrocious. They may as well have been wearing North jumpers. You guys got everything, 50/50ās, the lot. It was a bloody disgrace. I was waiting for one of them to blow the whistle as you headed forward in the finish and end up taking the shot from the goal line on your behalf. Talk about an armchair ride!ā He replied.
I pictured him leading the MCC Boo Boys throughout the final quarter North charge.
He even justified the dangerous tackle decision awarded to May ffs. āFrom the view the umpire had it must have looked dangerous!ā
āMate, fā offā I replied with a smile, ācongrats on the win!ā
I actually thought heād be more balanced and praise our youngsters or whatever but nup.
Theyāre a different breed, especially those who couldnāt lie their way to WA as our state was in lockdown to see the GF win.
So ????LDU. 5 & 4
May 5&3
Viney 4&3
Zurhaar 2&1
Shezeel 2
Rivers 1
What was the second one, H2H? I know the Ford 50 metre penalty was a gift.North got gifted two goals in the run home. Iām not sorry.
What was the second one, H2H? I know the Ford 50 metre penalty was a gift.
It was soft but there and ford had the composure to point it out.What was the second one, H2H? I know the Ford 50 metre penalty was a gift.
It was soft but there and ford had the composure to point it out.
That seemed to be a mistake. The downfield for Zurhaar to goal was a bit soft - youād see similar let go or brought back.What was the second one, H2H? I know the Ford 50 metre penalty was a gift.
Yeah but that's the rule. Soft or not. Doesn't make it a "gift".