
TeeKray
Moderator








- Moderator
- #4,051
The guy who wrote the article in the Fin Review said on SEN this morning that he was surprised the take out from his article was the religious stuff rather than the NAB stuff which is much more fundamentally related to a CEO role. He even said he didn't think the former should've disqualified him from the position but the latter should've.
It's an interesting insight into how the AFL industry will immediately jump on issues relating to image and values but are much slower to identify issues of corporate governance. Might explain why there are so many unprofessional or even downright shady things that happen such as supplements programmes, torture camps, coaches abusing human rights, etc, let alone the rest that we probably don't hear about or haven't heard about yet.
It's an interesting insight into how the AFL industry will immediately jump on issues relating to image and values but are much slower to identify issues of corporate governance. Might explain why there are so many unprofessional or even downright shady things that happen such as supplements programmes, torture camps, coaches abusing human rights, etc, let alone the rest that we probably don't hear about or haven't heard about yet.