So we gave up pick 50 in order to help get pick 55 from last year.
They're looking for another Stokes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
So we gave up pick 50 in order to help get pick 55 from last year.
At this stage, we've only got 2 list spots free. So 9 & 13 not bad to take in the draft.I'm not entirely happy with the deal, but one thing I do like is our picks.
Doesn't Sound to bad to me, I'm also pretty certain Lyons and Kerridge are going to be traded, also maybe wright
9, 13, 28, 32
With 2x rookie upgrades we won't need itWHY ARE WE GIVING UP PICK 50 AS WELL?
At this stage, we've only got 2 list spots free. So 9 & 13 not bad to take in the draft.
Use 28, 32 and players to complete any more trades to come.
all depends on what we make of the picks now, draft for the first 2 and trade the rest perhaps (with maybe lyons and kerridge involved)At the end of the day pick 14 wasnt enough. To get 9, 28 and a player that improves the list somewhat is better than 14 alone. That was the goal.
Sent from my SM-N915G using Tapatalk
This has been my secret hope for the last fortnight. Gibbs is still a serious talent who brings exactly what we need, brilliant disposal and calmness under pressure off half back. He is obviously jaded at Carlton and they really need to rebuild from scratch so I'll be keeping an eye on this.His source appears to be from Carlton. Other than Bryce Gibbs, I'm not sure who they have that would be considered a Big fish. And I can't see Gibbs happening at all.
We'd actually need to cut 3 players and bring no one else in to be able to use 50.We have 4 of the first 32 picks, plus gore and 2 rookie upgrades. I highly doubt we are going to use a pick that late in the draft, so I couldn't care less that we gave pick 50 to them
But that is always the rub on any deal or any draft. That is outside of the Dangerfield issue.all depends on what we make of the picks now, draft for the first 2 and trade the rest perhaps (with maybe lyons and kerridge involved)
any chance of going after Redden, Aish or Mayes?
Makes sense when you think about it. Geelong have given up their first two round picks. Their first pick (pending future trades) is round 3. They get two round 3 picks (in a draft with little depth) and we have 2 x first round picks and 2 x second round picks. Although I would argue that we should not have given them our 3 round draft pick....we now have 4 picks under 33 (thus far) and would probably not use that pick 50 anyway.And our third rounder back. ******* brilliant.
Look, I know it's not worth a whole lot in this draft, but obviously Geelong, A COMPETITOR, want it for something. It has some value, and likely could have helped secure other targets.
This is really below standard.
No. Forget about gore, he's steak knifes ands value is nothing. So we get pick 9 and 28 for one of the best midfielders in the competition and the the deal gets done before lunch time on day one.At the end of the day pick 14 wasnt enough. To get 9, 28 and a player that improves the list somewhat is better than 14 alone. That was the goal.
Sent from my SM-N915G using Tapatalk