- Jun 5, 2007
- 11,091
- 16,862
- AFL Club
- Geelong
No he was Bernard thenHe did, but he's not the same player any more.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
No he was Bernard thenHe did, but he's not the same player any more.
TDK 203 IIRC Blitz about 198Great post - Blicavs great career and all the rest of it , but he looks finished as a midfielder
Whats TDK height and what is Marks height - i think it could be an even match up in the ruck
the signal to send Stanley in?It'll be a Blitzkrieg - sheer weight of numbers around the ball and missiles coming in from all directions. Geelong will flood the backline and wait until Carlton runs out of ammo. Then Tora Tora Tora!
But Stanley and Conway can halve contests, Blicavs doesn't even do that, at least not the 2024 version. He'll just need to get in the way of the Carlton ruckman and prevent him from clearing the ball himself. Then it will be up to our superior midfield to hunt the ball.It's funny seeing people worried we'll get beaten in the ruck with Blicavs. Have you not been watching? Conway or Stanley have been smashed in the ruck week in week out for months now.
But Stanley and Conway can halve contests,
They have indeed but when Blicavs went into the ruck it got worse.You're watching a different game to me then. Cause Grundy, Pittonet, Briggs, Gawn and Nankervis have all absolutely had their way with us recently.
But Stanley and Conway can halve contests, Blicavs doesn't even do that, at least not the 2024 version. He'll just need to get in the way of the Carlton ruckman and prevent him from clearing the ball himself. Then it will be up to our superior midfield to hunt the ball.
They have indeed but when Blicavs went into the ruck it got worse.
Are we intending on sending Brad close into the ruck? Because he might be next in line in this teamWho says Blicavs will be rucking?
STD as back up. Champagne comedyStrange Team Selection. No genuine ruckman
Stanley out injured. Neale omitted
Blitz sole ruck. Possibly STD as back-up.
What is Scott up to?
Letting Stanley sweat it as an emergency.
Let him do soul searching to fire him up?
If he wants to be No.1 ruck he must deliver.
If Stanley has anything left, he will respond.
Self motivation, is astute coaching tactic.
Scott is trying to get the Cats back on track
He has named all available senior players
Too much at stake to go without a Ruck
Many are calling Scott crazy tonight.
If it works Scott is a coaching genius.
We could easily lose the next 4.
If that happens it is season over.
I'm not seeing this easy run home anymore.
I can't see a pathways to 4 points for the Cats this week,maybe we should have debuted a couple from the two's, AAron Lord 1994 Semi V Carlton at Waverley never prouder than being a Cat supporter that day.
If we lose the next 4 we would have lost 8 out of 9 games.I'm more referring to how it relates to finishing position of top 5 pick. We would have to basically forfeit not to win against both North and WCE at Kardinia Park which is 10 wins. Last year that's pick 6-8 before matching or compo and that was about as early as 10 wins lands it.
Everyone is pretty doom and gloom but I reckon we beat Essendon and Hawthorn
I do think that whatever we put forward is a losing ruck proposition so we should be better at ground level relative to what we would be running Stanley like it was a weekend at Bernie'sIt's funny seeing people worried we'll get beaten in the ruck with Blicavs. Have you not been watching? Conway or Stanley have been smashed in the ruck week in week out for months now.
Literally all I'm saying is we've already won too many games to get anything out of losing.If we lose the next 4 we would have lost 8 out of 9 games.
That would feel like 1999 all over again. Aka the least enjoyable season I have ever endured as a cats fan.
All we would need is Stengle to leave at the end of the season to emulate Colbert leaving at the end of 1999.
Good times
I do think that whatever we put forward is a losing ruck proposition so we should be better at ground level relative to what we would be running Stanley like it was a weekend at Bernie's
Rumour is blitz is carrying a niggle though so wouldn't even expect Blitz to blanket him in any meaningful wayHi guys - very interesting move to play Blicavs. TDK's an average tap ruckman and excels around the ground with his aerobic capcity. Obviously Blicavs will have him covered for pace and endurance, so it could be a masterstroke.
Any idea who goes to Cripps? Usually Blicavs makes Cripps a non-factor.
I really don't want to know how Scotty plans to put this bio weapon into effectSTD as back up. Champagne comedy
I know, I am just being dramatic (and quite enjoying it actually).Literally all I'm saying is we've already won too many games to get anything out of losing.
Good point, we've got a wealth of options who could fill the ruck void. SDK and Tomahawk. Tommy Atkins standing toe to toe with TDK would throw him off his game.Who says Blicavs will be rucking?
I don’t know either, but I would certainly tune into the game to find out.I really don't want to know how Scotty plans to put this bio weapon into effect
Boring team selection.