Gethelred
Moderator
- May 1, 2016
- 30,838
- 59,668
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Moderator
- #2
Link to the proposed Referendum, from the Referendum Working Group:
The following will result in warnings to begin with, and if said behaviour continues will be escalated:
You might notice that the final rule is from the board rules. Thought we should probably remember that this is against the rules in case it's been forgotten.
Let's play nicely from here, people.
The Uluru Statement from the Heart:(Edited 6 April 2023)
These are the words that will be put to the Australian people in the upcoming referendum as agreed by the Referendum Working Group (made up of representatives of First Nations communities from around Australia):
"A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?"
As well as that, it will be put to Australians that the constitution be amended to include a new chapter titled "Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples".
The details would be:
View attachment 1636890
The Prime Minister has committed to the government introducing legislation with this wording to parliament on 30 March 2023 and to establishing a joint parliamentary committee to consider it and receive submissions on the wording, providing ALL members of Parliament with the opportunity to consider and debate the full details of the proposal.
Parliament will then vote on the wording in June in the lead up to a National Referendum.
The ANU has issued a paper responding to common public concerns expressed in relation to the proposed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice here:
Indigenous Voice to Parliament | Australian National University
Responding to common concerns about an aboriginal and torres strait islander voice First Nations portfolio Backgroundwww.anu.edu.au
Summary details of the key points from this paper may be found in Chief post here:
Seeing as things have gotten a bit toxic in here, let's try to return things to a more civil tone.Not specifically No. In any case it does not form part of the Referendum proposal.
View attachment 1769742
The following will result in warnings to begin with, and if said behaviour continues will be escalated:
- referring to another poster as racist without direct provocation.
- dismissing or deriding another poster's lived experience.
- personal attacks or one line posts designed solely to insult or deride.
You might notice that the final rule is from the board rules. Thought we should probably remember that this is against the rules in case it's been forgotten.
Let's play nicely from here, people.