Protected from what? Has copped many a solid hit, certainly doesn't avoid contact.
Maybe from the quality of the blokes running beside him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Protected from what? Has copped many a solid hit, certainly doesn't avoid contact.
Maybe from the quality of the blokes running beside him.
If this is on how they are playing right now, incredibly wrong, but if its about potential, I think first three about right. Hawkins hasn't really shown much to convince me, Gumbleton has played three games so no idea there, Hansen & Thorp ditto, Grigg isn't fantastic. Really hard to tell yet. In regards to the protected thing, Gibbs is no different to Selwood, Ablett/Bartel/Corey are the three before Selwood, but Judd/Stevens/Murphy before Gibbs show Gibbs clearly has good support in the midfield.Bryce Gibbs' potential has no end. He will clearly justify by years end why he was taken as the number 1 pick last year. Selwood is very good, but gibbs has had to work hard with less quality around him. Selwood was & is protected.
1. Gibbs
2. Luenberger
3. Selwood
4. Hawkins
5. Boak
6. Hansen
7. Gumbleton
8. Brown
9. Grigg
10. Thorp
Its very very very early.
How was Cooney going at the same stage? Even Buddy was in and out of the hawks at the same stage. Rough was still in and out a year later. Delidio at the same stage - he is just starting to show how good he really is now?
Gary Ablett Snr had been delisted by the hawks at the same stage of his career and was playing country footy!
Selwood is a freak to get up and going so early - very few can do that. It doesn't mean he is going to be the better player though.
I'm not sure that theory really applies, when he gets so much of his own ball. Can someone explain this theory to me?
How can he be more protected than Gibbs, when he has been thrown straight into the midfield? Because he hasn't been tagged hard? Has Gibbs?
Well, here's an example. Des Headland played his first year with Brisbane and looked like a million dollars playing with the likes of Voss, Black, Lappin, Aker, Brown, lynch, Johnson, Pike etc etc.. Similar to Selwood with Geelong. He then went over to Freo, a no name team and becomes an average player. I am not saying Selwood is average because he is not, but Gibbs was playing with a bunch of kids that got smashed week in week out. Selwood like Des was playing with a hardened group of players that dominated games . Place Gibbs in either of those sides and he would do the same. Hope that helps put things in perspective for you.
Gibbs' high level of maturity at a young age actually limits his scope for improvement compared to players like Thorp and Hansen.
agree hes a very good player, behind selwood however., but ild keep him behind the previous players i listed. nothing against boak however, absolute gem of a player.
Headland always looked like a downhill skier with polish. Going to Freo showed his mental state.
Selwood will be a gun for years (excluding injury).
And as for these threads - why? Why don't we assess the performance of the 2008 draftees - its about as useful.
THe draft we should judge is 98 - ten years on - how ahve they faired - the crap are gone and only the good remain.
so wtf is the reason that Gumbleton is a better player then Boak?
Boak is the 2nd best in that draft after his performances so far.
And Sellar, what a joke.
I can sense that your not a biased Geelong supporter but you clearly missed the biggest point in comparing Selwood to Gibbs or Boak.There are so many things wrong in this thread that I can't be bothered pointing them out, but let me put my 2 cents worth in:
Gibbs will be a player, no doubt. Will he be the best of this draft when all have finished their careers? I doubt it.
On all probability, Selwood will be the highest achiever from this draft. He came into the league as a skinny kid, and contributed from day 1. No other player in this draft can say this. And when their careers are judged at the end, all of their games are counted. That's right, even the one's at the start. You can't just say "only the games after they hit 50 count when judging a player". Selwood has such a head start in regards performances to date over any other player in this draft, that other players will have to turn into absolute superstars to pass him if he continues at any decent level of development (which I believe he will, he has already stepped up his game this year as he has started to grow into his body and gain confidence).
I have not seen enough of Gumbleton, Hansen or Leuenberger to make any meaningful judgements on them. But Gumbleton's and Hansen's injury histories would worry me if I was an Essendon or NM supporter. Who knows what these big guys will become? KPP/Ruckman are a bit of a lottery and it is doubtful that you will see meaningful contributions from any of them in the forseeable future. By that stage, Selwood will have lapped the field.
Yes, I understand that I just sound like another biased Geelong fan getting overly excited about Selwood (and this may well be true), but I truly believe that at the end of his career, we will be talking about Selwood in reverential terms. The kid is that good.
Gumbleton has MORE POTENTIAL than Boak. If you can believe that of course.so wtf is the reason that Gumbleton is a better player then Boak?
Boak is the 2nd best in that draft after his performances so far.
And Sellar, what a joke.
I have not seen enough of Gumbleton, Hansen or Leuenberger to make any meaningful judgements on them. But Gumbleton's and Hansen's injury histories would worry me if I was an Essendon or NM supporter. Who knows what these big guys will become? KPP/Ruckman are a bit of a lottery and it is doubtful that you will see meaningful contributions from any of them in the forseeable future
Well, here's an example. Des Headland played his first year with Brisbane and looked like a million dollars playing with the likes of Voss, Black, Lappin, Aker, Brown, lynch, Johnson, Pike etc etc.. Similar to Selwood with Geelong.
Gibbs has a bunch of youngens around him with an odd bloke named Judd.
Yes, I understand that I just sound like another biased Geelong fan getting overly excited about Selwood (and this may well be true), but I truly believe that at the end of his career, we will be talking about Selwood in reverential terms. The kid is that good.
Horrible, horrible comparison.
Headland was a polished outside midfielder who was always going to look a million dollars with Voss and Black getting him the footy, and then look poor when he had average mids trying to feed him.
Joel Selwood is the absolute definition of an inside mid who wins his own footy.
He doesn't rely on anyone to get him the footy,
unlike Headland, which makes the comparison a poor one.
Kerr and Selwood are both excellent players, but they do look better due to the quality they have around them.
THe draft we should judge is 98 - ten years on - how ahve they faired - the crap are gone and only the good remain.
Why bother ??? You are just a biased cats fan with no credibility whatsoever...you have a "feeling" doesn't really inspire anyone to believe a word you typed .
It's the vibe of the thing
Who knows which player will be the best out of the 2006 draft..only time will tell.
Have you seen the line of Carlton supporters predicting Gibbs will be the best, with nothing but hope and a feeling?