Richmond fined by ASADA for neglecting administrative obligations

Remove this Banner Ad

Jul 4, 2012
5,571
9,415
County Grant
AFL Club
Geelong
https://www.hit.com.au/news/melbourne/richmond-to-be-penalised-by-asada?station=fox

Richmond is the latest club penalised for not updating the address of senior listed player with ASADA.

The club will be fined $10,000 - of which, $5,000 will be suspended.


Unable to keep accurate books in relation to drug testing, not having a paper trail didn't do Essendon any favours, and it is good to see they are consistent in keeping Richmond under check as well.

Other clubs have been fined for similar indiscretions, however, this is not the first time Richmond has been found guilty of such carelessness. For what is such a simple administrative error, to make it twice shows a general disregard for anti-doping policies and a failure to learn from one's past mistakes (similar Hawkins' inability to realise jumper punches are a think of the past).

What other administrative errors are yet to be uncovered at the Richmond Football Club? Moving a decimal point, removing a digit, omitting significant details...all may seem rather benign in isolation, but could be utilised in a manner that hides a greater secret.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Can we push them out of finals into 9th?

No, because that would ruin the heartwarming fairytale of the Eagles scraping in. Overcoming obstacles of travel dodgy umpiring, and the Victorian-centric league.





(Besides, we got fined for it this year too, I think)
 
It's ok.

Richmond produced a photo of a print out of a photocopy of the address form, to prove that they changed the addresses long ago.

ASADA were just being typically difficult by not believing it was legit, as they're not very trusting, for whatever reason.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

As repeat offenders for this type of incident, it makes me realise why there was a push to remove Richmond's board last year. There is not much one can do about contracted players and staff, however a swift clean out of administrators and leaders is an absolute must to ensure rules are not repeatedly broken, bringing the club further into disrepute. Once is a mistake, twice is foolishness.
 
As repeat offenders for this type of incident, it makes me realise why there was a push to remove Richmond's board last year. There is not much one can do about contracted players and staff, however a swift clean out of administrators and leaders is an absolute must to ensure rules are not repeatedly broken, bringing the club further into disrepute. Once is a mistake, twice is foolishness.
lol geelong have been fined twice.

http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/se...a/news-story/c580b8b9c14d845acd126ef9a5c2bd6b
 
Two breaches, not two separate occasions of breaching the policy.
Richmond have been fined once for failing to provide a address and once for not notifying of a missed training session. No one actually cares mate
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Richmond fined by ASADA for neglecting administrative obligations

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top