Round 10 Discussion

[vast]

He's still inconsistent, he's had a few shit scores along with a few good scores which is why I originally benched him this week.

I was cursing Savage being made the sub yesterday but that turned out to be a blessing in disguise when I swapped him on ground for Oxley.

It was a bit toungue in cheek but he has been a great rookie this year. If it wasnt for him and saad doing so well as rookies my backline would be even more of a joke than it is.

 

[GOAUS!]

2219 all out.

 

[Nelso]

lol MacDonald finishes on 90

 

[GOAUS!]

Bloody raymagoo making us all look like fools again, another 2400+.

 

[stevebbb]

noooooooo didn't get 2250+

got 2240, happy
10/10 league wins

 

[Krujan]

I need Oxley to finish within 18 points of Pendles to win my SC Cup game. Pray for Gingy.

#prayforgingy

Actually, I stuffed up my maths, I needed Oxley to outscore Pendles by 2 points to win.

































I win by 7

 

[pulpdriver]

2161. Not too bad considering I had a 0 in the forward line and Spud Lewis as captain. I actually scored more than last week.

 

[Kadog]

He still had 20 touches. Dunno what his DE% was like.

If this system is to be fair, KPDs should have points negated if direct opponent kicks a goal.

90points in a game where he had zero impact. In fact, he influenced the game in a negative way....vs

Oxley 122. BOG. 30 possessions, countless intercept marks.

CD are fn drunk. It's a ****ing joke.

 

[Red Syrah]

Lost my league match by 12 thanks to Hogans 33. Thought i had it for sure.....

 

[Kadog]

Actually, I stuffed up my maths, I needed Oxley to outscore Pendles by 2 points to win.
































I win by 7

Arsiest result EVER! LOL good stuff.

 

[spangleduck]

lol MacDonald finishes on 90

If this system is to be fair, KPDs should have points negated if direct opponent kicks a goal.

90points in a game where he had zero impact. In fact, he influenced the game in a negative way....vs

Oxley 122. BOG. 30 possessions, countless intercept marks.

CD are fn drunk. It's a ******* joke.

Good to see some people supporting my views hahah

 

[CasuallyDressed]

1999.

My lowest non-bye score ever!

I can only wonder what's gonna happen during the byes with my pack of spuds.

 

[Thuggee_Cult]

2211 all out

Captain Gray, Lewis and Griffen my downlows but it could have been worse.

2/2 in leagues

 

[Plugger35]

It was a bit toungue in cheek but he has been a great rookie this year. If it wasnt for him and saad doing so well as rookies my backline would be even more of a joke than it is.

Yeah Saad and Oxley have outperformed some of my higher priced defenders, will be sticking with both of them.

1999.

My lowest non-bye score ever!

I can only wonder what's gonna happen during the byes with my pack of spuds.

So I guess you don't feel like partying like it's 1999 Prince style then?

 

[GOAUS!]

A few median scores from across the leagues, should give some idea of a par score

Kliq: 2117
Tragics 1: 2176
Dogs: 2091
Div 1: 2120

 

[THECHIEFTON]

If this system is to be fair, KPDs should have points negated if direct opponent kicks a goal.

90points in a game where he had zero impact. In fact, he influenced the game in a negative way....vs

Oxley 122. BOG. 30 possessions, countless intercept marks.

CD are fn drunk. It's a ******* joke.

I thought Oxley would have scored more TBH. Fiar point but that's not how it works so his score is pretty reasonable. They are giving points for spoils now aren't they?

 

[Thuggee_Cult]

If this system is to be fair, KPDs should have points negated if direct opponent kicks a goal.

90points in a game where he had zero impact. In fact, he influenced the game in a negative way....vs

Oxley 122. BOG. 30 possessions, countless intercept marks.

CD are fn drunk. It's a ******* joke.

I certainly think tall forwards who kick bags of 6/7 get jibbed, I thought Cloke was worth more than what he got

 

[Plugger35]

A few median scores from across the leagues, should give some idea of a par score

Kliq: 2117
Tragics 1: 2176
Dogs: 2091
Div 1: 2120

Looks like I should be moving up in the overall rankings then with 2275, might even sneak into the top 10k.

 

[raymagoo]

Heading to my room with the moisturizer!

 

[peppy la pew]

What happened to sidey, 59 bloody hell for anyone who picked him up at $600+k

 

[GOAUS!]

Looks like I should be moving up in the overall rankings then with 2269, might even sneak into the top 10k.

I'm hoping to sneak into the top 4k.

 

[Amazing Bombers]

A few median scores from across the leagues, should give some idea of a par score

Kliq: 2117
Tragics 1: 2176
Dogs: 2091
Div 1: 2120

Phew should hold ground or move up slightly . Ahead of most of those and slightly behind Tragics 1 with my 2173.

 

[vast]

Parker and SJ both had 27 last week and both got 59.

It's not like their hands are tied

You are right, his score was too high thats just the common inconsistency you get in sc, the point I was trying to make was more about the irrelevance of cloke beating him in terms of his sc score. You dont lose points for your opponent outmarking and kicking goals on you.

 

[CrashTestDummy]

2040 with a donut and MJ's -3.

 

[Stickers32]

2290 and lost by 36pts! F U Lewis


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk