Bewley last man in but he also had his moments. Bewley surprised me after his Peel form, must like the big stage to perform.
maybe he prefers to kick the sherin? Walters had similiar issues at WAFL level.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bewley last man in but he also had his moments. Bewley surprised me after his Peel form, must like the big stage to perform.
HahahaWould drop Hogan after another putrid outing. If the club is serious about making people earn their spots Jesse should be sent to Peel until he's tearing it up down there. I don't wanna hear the whole "He's a big name so he's automatically best 22" ********. The way he's playing he does not deserve to be in our best 22. The only way he'll learn is by making him earn his way back up. Bring in Jones to play ruck so Lobb can move to FF. Have Cox play the CHF role and let Jesse play at Peel until he can actually start pulling his head in. Would personally bring in Bennell this week but I know they won't.
IN: Jones
OUT: Hogan
Ok, I am preparing myself for (another) bigfooty bashing with this suggestion; I think a second ruck option could be someone like Logue. Given he is not yet up to AFL standard, I would consider Hughes. It would be totally conceding the contest, and is really only about giving Lobb a spell. Logue I think can at least contest and keep some of the other 2nd rucks honest, whereas Hughes would be much more an extra midfielder who is prepared to use his body.Whilst I agree with you on Bennell. Jones would have to be considered, especially if Mason Cox plays.
Before yesterday’s game I was keen for Brennan Cox to play relief ruck but everytime he went in the middle we got totally smashed. Can you imagine B. Cox vs Grundy or Mason Cox. If Mason doesn’t play then I think Brennan should cope against their relief.
Here comes the first whack. Logue is coming off a foot injury, I wouldn't be throwing him into the ruck where he will be jumping an@d landing and potentially damage it. If we aren't going with a genuine second ruck I think Cox is the best option.Ok, I am preparing myself for (another) bigfooty bashing with this suggestion; I think a second ruck option could be someone like Logue. Given he is not yet up to AFL standard, I would consider Hughes. It would be totally conceding the contest, and is really only about giving Lobb a spell. Logue I think can at least contest and keep some of the other 2nd rucks honest, whereas Hughes would be much more an extra midfielder who is prepared to use his body.
We are gradually becoming a team that is not dependent on a dominant ruck, and that is not a bad thing imo.
I want Brayshaw out because his kicking is beyond putrid.Is the Out: Brayshaw just a thing every week now for some people. 13th best player on the field.
Hard to swallow for everyone but as young players, him and Cerra are going to be up and down. You are kidding yourselves if you think we would get consistenlty better from any of the guys at Peel and pumping games into 19 year olds who contribute most weeks has to be the best thing for their development
Also, lols at Hipwood
View attachment 681594
Was it bad on the weekend? My main memories are him kicking that skidding goal and hitting Fyfe at the top of the square for a goal.I want Brayshaw out because his kicking is beyond putrid.
I noticed one zero pressure turnover by foot but I wasn't looking for them. His set shot was also predictably poor. I would say it was about par for Brayshaw based on what we've seen: pretty bad.Was it bad on the weekend? My main memories are him kicking that skidding goal and hitting Fyfe at the top of the square for a goal.
He was straight in the guts directly after our goal, after already pushing up during play like you saidThe way I see it Blakely was still mostly a HB in the last quarter but we had the wall set up so he was sweeping the ball up around the centre square and driving us forward as much as he was following the ball
I want Brayshaw out because his kicking is beyond putrid.
It cant have been that bad for the rating he had from 15 touches. Every player has 1 or 2 a game. I'm not saying his kicking his good, it needs serious work but I do think he's better of lateI noticed one zero pressure turnover by foot but I wasn't looking for them. His set shot was also predictably poor. I would say it was about par for Brayshaw based on what we've seen: pretty bad.
What am I looking at here? lolIs the Out: Brayshaw just a thing every week now for some people. 13th best player on the field.
Hard to swallow for everyone but as young players, him and Cerra are going to be up and down. You are kidding yourselves if you think we would get consistenlty better from any of the guys at Peel and pumping games into 19 year olds who contribute most weeks has to be the best thing for their development
Also, lols at Hipwood
View attachment 681594
How would the nerves have been if he was taking that last kick?
It cant have been that bad for the rating he had from 15 touches. Every player has 1 or 2 a game. I'm not saying his kicking his good, it needs serious work but I do think he's better of late
What am I looking at here? lol
Champion data ratings, not perfect by any means but I think it got it mostly right from the weekendWhat am I looking at here? lol
Im hearing ya gav...Logue as ruck chop. He has a huge leap and is agile enough for second efforts.Ok, I am preparing myself for (another) bigfooty bashing with this suggestion; I think a second ruck option could be someone like Logue. Given he is not yet up to AFL standard, I would consider Hughes. It would be totally conceding the contest, and is really only about giving Lobb a spell. Logue I think can at least contest and keep some of the other 2nd rucks honest, whereas Hughes would be much more an extra midfielder who is prepared to use his body.
We are gradually becoming a team that is not dependent on a dominant ruck, and that is not a bad thing imo.
Ok, I am preparing myself for (another) bigfooty bashing with this suggestion; I think a second ruck option could be someone like Logue. Given he is not yet up to AFL standard, I would consider Hughes. It would be totally conceding the contest, and is really only about giving Lobb a spell. Logue I think can at least contest and keep some of the other 2nd rucks honest, whereas Hughes would be much more an extra midfielder who is prepared to use his body.
We are gradually becoming a team that is not dependent on a dominant ruck, and that is not a bad thing imo.
Yeah it was. Down in Mandurah. That seems a long time ago now, with had bad his goal kicking has become.Langdon's kicked one after the siren for the win before. Might have been in JLT though, not sure.