Round 12 trades

[Mr_Nyah]

So in a worst case scenario, you burn two trades for $15K?

Pass.

Yeah, worst possible case. Best possible case you get a premium or an excellent back-up dirt cheap. I mentioned I probably wouldn't do it, but gee Bews and Gardiner are tempting me.

 

[Danco]

Probably looking to ditch Polec and Langford this week.
12 trades and 362k in the bank.
Or do you think I need to work on my forwards first?

Next week probably go Taylor > OBrien.

 

[Spanish Sahara]

Polec to Shenton locked away. Shenton to Pendles in a few weeks time is the plan (cant afford Polec to Pendles now)

Tossing up between trading Mcevoy or Langdon to Jaensch.

Team is as follows with 11 trades and 13K


Polec to Shenton and Mcevoy to Nic Nat gives me 287K.

Or do I hold Mcevoy (with no cover) and bring in Jaesnch for Langdon

I have three more premos to bring in - Pendles, premo defender (Jaesnch or Mitchell), premo fwd (via ambrose and Taylor)

Any other trade ideas?

 

[bbco49]

Any advice? 11 trades, only $10k in the bank. Considering McEvoy > Lobbe/Nic Nat

 

[richolovesgoal]

View attachment 60678

Any advice? 11 trades, only $10k in the bank. Considering McEvoy > Lobbe/Nic Nat

Is McEvoy playing? If not cark him (I'd go Lobbe out of those 2)

It's probably also time to upgrade one of Polec/Langdon if you can.

 

[TD]

Is anyone jumping on the Tex train?

 

[richolovesgoal]

Okay right now i'm in 800000 minds.

Currently have 9 trades left with 200K in the bank. Shenton is my only rookie left on the field who I hope to upgrade to Pendles in the next week or 2.

Currently considering 5 moves:

Hodge -> Bartel/Malceski
Roughead -> Parker
Montagna -> Pendles/Rockliff
Suckling -> Bartel/Malceski/Jaensch
Higgins - > Parker

3 of them obviously been under performing and unsure whether you want to keep Higgins and Suckling much longer.

Thoughts on these or are they all wasted trades?

 

[j0rdy1]

Might just go Sauce > Nic Nat. KK > Jaensch. Have 214k to upgrade Polec when he hopefully rises in price when the 46 is out of his system, will be the last rookie on the field for me.

 

[j0rdy1]

3 of them obviously been under performing and unsure whether you want to keep Higgins and Suckling much longer.

Thoughts on these or are they all wasted trades?

I don't see why you wouldn't want to keep Higgins, pumping out a few 100s and if he is your F6 thats bloody good, he is my F6 at the moment and I'm happy to keep him there, once I upgrade Polec(last rookie) I might upgrade Higgins to Boomer if I can make it work.

 

[Judd_Magic]

Was going to go Langford > Jaensch but now kinda thinking that maybe I should go Hanley instead as a POD?

This is all based if I decide to keep Langdon at D6 all year or trade him to Mitchell later on.

Here's my team as it stands with bringing in Jaensch for Langford and Halihan for Shenton.

Not really that happy with my team to be honest, could be alot better as it has Swan, Roughead and Wingard in it stinking it up!

 

[Hoges64]

Higgins with a B/E of 54 this week means he's a keeper. I'd expect him to score well against Brissy too so he should be a keeper for the week after too. Probably won't score all that we'll against the Pies which is where you should look at trade as dogs have Port, GC, Melbourne, Hawthorn, Geelong and Essendon after. Not in that order though.

 

[Kadog]

Was going to go Langford > Jaensch but now kinda thinking that maybe I should go Hanley instead as a POD?

This is all based if I decide to keep Langdon at D6 all year or trade him to Mitchell later on.

Here's my team as it stands with bringing in Jaensch for Langford and Halihan > Shenton.

Not really that happy with my team to be honest, could be alot better as it has Swan, Roughead and Wingard in it stinking it up!

View attachment 60685

Stick with Wrench, I mean Stench, I mean Yench. You'll be doing all us non owners a huge favor

Dodgey jokes aside, stick with your trades. They're solid. You always have the option to go Langdon>Mitchell or Hanley (if his form picks up) later on.

Also, get primed for the Dane Swan second half show. Played with a sore heel, well rested now and ready to go. You will have his name tattooed on your butt cheek by years end

 

[Monya Meow Meow]

Haven't seen Claye Beams mentioned a lot around here...
Is he a viable downgrade option?

 

[Kadog]

Okay right now i'm in 800000 minds.

Currently have 9 trades left with 200K in the bank. Shenton is my only rookie left on the field who I hope to upgrade to Pendles in the next week or 2.

Currently considering 5 moves:

Hodge -> Bartel/Malceski
Roughead -> Parker
Montagna -> Pendles/Rockliff
Suckling -> Bartel/Malceski/Jaensch
Higgins - > Parker

3 of them obviously been under performing and unsure whether you want to keep Higgins and Suckling much longer.

Thoughts on these or are they all wasted trades?

I would hold on all those players except Suckling.

Suckling>Malcheski

Hold Higgins till his BE is too high

 

[Thuggee_Cult]

Just these two trades for me this week.

Langdon > Bartel
KK > Jaensch

It rounds out my backline and gives me 9 trades left to fill 2 premo FWD spots.

BANG BANG. Locking it in!

 

[SnappyHappy]

Was going to go Langford > Jaensch but now kinda thinking that maybe I should go Hanley instead as a POD?

This is all based if I decide to keep Langdon at D6 all year or trade him to Mitchell later on.

Here's my team as it stands with bringing in Jaensch for Langford and Halihan for Shenton.

Not really that happy with my team to be honest, could be alot better as it has Swan, Roughead and Wingard in it stinking it up!

View attachment 60685

You better not bloody jinx him JM!!!!

 

[Judd_Magic]

You better not bloody jinx him JM!!!!

Jinx who?

Jaensch or Hanley? LOL!

You have both right?

 

[Judd_Magic]

Stick with Wrench, I mean Stench, I mean Yench. You'll be doing all us non owners a huge favor

Dodgey jokes aside, stick with your trades. They're solid. You always have the option to go Langdon>Mitchell or Hanley (if his form picks up) later on.

Also, get primed for the Dane Swan second half show. Played with a sore heel, well rested now and ready to go. You will have his name tattooed on your butt cheek by years end

Man I hope you are right about Swan.

He hasn't done much since I brought him in during Anzac Day week.

 

[Kadog]

Haven't seen Claye Beams mentioned a lot around here...
Is he a viable downgrade option?

I have. Really want to bring him in before the bubble but I'll wait another week to assess. Shenton trade took precedent.

 

[V_23]

12 trades and $310,500 left, which option is better?
Option 1: Buckley > Harvey (will eventually move forward) and Langdon > Jaensch (have to play Bews)
Option 2: Fasolo > Harvey and Langford > Jaensch

Wanted to finish my defence off with Simpson and Mitchell but probably have to settle for Jaensch. Thanks.

 

[SnappyHappy]

Jinx who?

Jaensch or Hanley? LOL!

You have both right?

Haha nah I decided to only get one because I need one or two of Bartel/Simpson/Swallow. I'm doing Langford > Hanley this week, and in a few weeks I'll turn Langdon into Bartel/Swallow. I'm surprised so many are jumping on Jaensch, IMO Hanley has more upside.

 

[Lachy Jamison]

Need some help! 11 trades with 28k remaining.

McEvoy > Nic Nat (Risky)
Acres > Litherland via Langdon - Bit of a risk, allows me to go Langdon > Harvey/Parker/Gray via Shenton next week.

 

[SnappyHappy]

Can some legend post Most pop. traded IN & Most pop. traded OUT stats? Cheers

 

[Judd_Magic]

Haha nah I decided to only get one because I need one or two of Bartel/Simpson/Swallow. I'm doing Langford > Hanley this week, and in a few weeks I'll turn Langdon into Bartel/Swallow. I'm surprised so many are jumping on Jaensch, IMO Hanley has more upside.

What are your reasons for saying that Hanley has more upside than Jaensch?

I am starting to think that Henderson coming back will affect Jaensch so maybe Hanleys the better pick?

Jaensch or Hanley?

 

[vinum coupe]

Anyone reckon these are wasted trades?

Langdon > Simpson
Polec > Selwood

Would only leave me with 13 trades.
And I still have about 4 guys to upgrade.