Round 13 Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

For both of us, I hope that's the case. So ruthless that you have only 16, as you would have had a very decent score had you had at least 18 playing

It's a bit painful thinking what could of been but it's mitigating the damage I was expecting from this round. If I can not drop too much rank this week it should be smooth sailing from here.
 
I had to pick 2 out of Logue, Hind, Bewley and Gardner. Of course I pick the 2 that will get 30-40 while Logue and Bewley get 80+.
Spare a thought for those of us who had to get all 4... it's like plugging holes on the Titanic.

In other news, may be time to take the punt on Blakely. None of the top teams have him, and if he hits form he could be our ticket up the rankings.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Spare a thought for those of us who had to get all 4... it's like plugging holes on the Titanic.

In other news, may be time to take the punt on Blakely. None of the top teams have him, and if he hits form he could be our ticket up the rankings.

Nothing stopping the top teams getting him too? If he tonnes today then its no secret he's in everyones team next week.
 
Spare a thought for those of us who had to get all 4... it's like plugging holes on the Titanic.

In other news, may be time to take the punt on Blakely. None of the top teams have him, and if he hits form he could be our ticket up the rankings.
I wish I could have all 4 of them! Could do with the 2 extra players to field 18...
yeah agree with Blakely, may as well take the punt. Overall ranking is meaningless for me now, won't get 1500 this week and will go too far behind. Thinking of just picking unique guys now like Fiorini after his bye and maybe Hunter if he does well tonight
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Round 13 Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top