- Apr 29, 2016
- 13,899
- 12,258
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
nah that's above avg. a lot of ppl not posting their true scores I think
Round 13 Discussion
- Thread starter TheRednWhite
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Apr 10, 2010
- 6,675
- 9,214
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- AFC Wimbledon
nah that's above avg. a lot of ppl not posting their true scores I think
1900 was under par last week, hopefully this week is a little tougher but not sure it will be.
- May 20, 2017
- 5,933
- 9,717
- AFL Club
- West Coast
In isolation I imagine it wouldnt be correct. I personally expect 30-40 from him so he's still underscored.
But having a similar player in logur with equally bad wafl scores tonne up probably doesnt help by comparrison.
- May 20, 2017
- 5,933
- 9,717
- AFL Club
- West Coast
You have done me a good service today. I salute you.
lmach
Naitanui2Yeo
Need 325 from Williams today to hit 1900.
HughJass
Draftee
- Jan 26, 2019
- 15
- 11
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Jul 1, 2013
- 23,048
- 19,358
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Fulham, 76ers, Cubs, Bills
I think a lot will depend on carnage and team coverage.
Essentially to gain from having ROB you either need
(a) Grundy/Gawn to have an injury
(b) be able to hold him until after r15 i.e. 2 more weeks.
If people have 20+ next week without ROB, and there isn't too much injury/rookie carnage then holding and downgrading elsewhere (O-Baker, Stack, Gibbons etc. who have maxed out would be ideal). But if you are down to 18 (esp. with Gardner etc on field), and/or other carnage I think you get rid of him.
TheRednWhite
Cursed Man
- Jan 27, 2017
- 14,511
- 12,989
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Thread starter
- #686
had a look...you're not doing that bad at all. Maybe under par but should still beat me by around 150 points lol
TheRednWhite
Cursed Man
- Jan 27, 2017
- 14,511
- 12,989
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Thread starter
- #687
par on this board seems like 1900+ ffs...I'll do well to get 1600 hahaha. Can only hope that par in the real world is more like 1800.
only have Cogs and Ziebell left, who everyone on this board seems to have
2 weeks ago I chose Broadbent over Perryman. They have been pretty similar so far but this week is the one that will hurt, Perryman would have been so handy right now.
Will be hard watching Jelly and Taranto go 130+ today while the one GWS mid that I do have (Cogs) struggles to 90
only have Cogs and Ziebell left, who everyone on this board seems to have
2 weeks ago I chose Broadbent over Perryman. They have been pretty similar so far but this week is the one that will hurt, Perryman would have been so handy right now.
Will be hard watching Jelly and Taranto go 130+ today while the one GWS mid that I do have (Cogs) struggles to 90
- Jul 1, 2013
- 23,048
- 19,358
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Fulham, 76ers, Cubs, Bills
Yeah you should always downgrade the board by around 100 to get a better picture! I'm hoping for 1850 but thinking more like low 1800s, which I think will be par.
TheRednWhite
Cursed Man
- Jan 27, 2017
- 14,511
- 12,989
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Thread starter
- #689
yeah true. I'm just disappointed that I didn't plan the byes well...actually did well this week to be a chance of 1600 with 16 playing considering the rookies spuds I had. If I just got those 2 extra players this week I could have been close enough to par. Broadbent was the main loss this week, came out of nowhere.
From everything I've seen on Twitter and Facebook, looks like around 1850 should be par this week. Anything over 1900 will be above, and anything above 2000 will be exceptional
- May 20, 2017
- 5,933
- 9,717
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Has everyones vcs factored in yet? I was semi excited to be inside the top 10k but I suspecg I'll be out of it by lockout with 100-150 piling onto most peoples scores.
TheRednWhite
Cursed Man
- Jan 27, 2017
- 14,511
- 12,989
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Thread starter
- #692
well congratulations on an exceptional score this week
- May 20, 2017
- 5,933
- 9,717
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Well thats good. Think I'll land around 1850 so I'll take par this week.
TheRednWhite
Cursed Man
- Jan 27, 2017
- 14,511
- 12,989
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Thread starter
- #694
yeah i said this yesterday haha, somehow still maintaining my live ranking of 11.8k with 1400 and 2 to play...just waiting for the 5k drop today once VC gets added and Taranto/Jelly get their 130s
well congratulations on an exceptional score this week
Hey after the year I've had, 2 exceptional scores in a row during a period where everyone else is having it a bit tougher, is my shining light, haha.
Need Cogs and Jelly to go 110 each to reach the magic 2000, which is doable (as I expect Larkey to score 30 or so)
My score = no VC AND incorrect total in the app.
Website is over 200 higher but still no double for VC.
I'm expecting to shoot up the rankings from 12k to AT LEAST top 5 once it's fixed.
- May 20, 2017
- 5,933
- 9,717
- AFL Club
- West Coast
I should make 2000 if I can pencil in Coniglio and Ziebell for a 150+ each and Perryman for 100. Lets go boys!
- May 20, 2017
- 5,933
- 9,717
- AFL Club
- West Coast
My score = no VC AND incorrect total in the app.
Website is over 200 higher but still no double for VC.
I'm expecting to shoot up the rankings from 12k to AT LEAST top 5 once it's fixed.
Despite the scores always being wrong the rankings displayed have always been correct (atleast last week anyway).
Kind of hoping the rankings are correctly factoring in everyones vcs already.
Jason Derulo
All Australian
- Apr 8, 2018
- 734
- 664
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I'm hoping this aswell and I think it might be the case as I'm currently ranked about 2,400 from about 500. I do have 5 players including my captain playing today but I don't think I have dropped this much during a round this year. It could also just be that there isn't a lot of points in it.
You might be right.
Website 1501
App 1337 (on my team and match up page)
If I got to weekly ranking RD 13 my score says 1641 which is 140 (Martin VC) higher than website.
Similar threads
