- Feb 13, 2003
- 21,724
- 24,129
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
We had a guy called David Rath that was a bio mechanics expert among other things and I don't think we ever replaced him. Rath was responsible for the goal kicking techniques of most of our four time premiership forwards.
My gripe is that while we applaud Cegs for his work as a resting ruckman playing forward, he should in the true scheme of things be at best our third marking option as a forward. Our forward setup is not what it should be. If the blueprint or gold standard was Budd, Rough and Hale as go to tall options then Hale was the third tall bailout option as Cegs would be if he was playing back in the day. Fast forward to yesterday we mostly had a resting ruck as the focal marking forward with the second tall being a tall pressure athlete in Nash. No wonder guys like Breust who is playing less attacking more defensive forward than in the past and Gunston are easier to lockdown on.
Failure to have the right structural players in place have had such an impact on the way our forward line functions. Much maligned Shoey straightened us up at a time when it was he, Rough and a resting ruck up forward.
Yes conversion is a problem from some with poor techniques but should a resting ruck be your go to big man at the end of the day.
A guy who was best on for Box Hill yesterday called Mitch Lewis may just be able to compete in the air, just... maybe.
I agree though, Cegs really is a ruckman first and a forward 2nd, he should be the 3rd option or the "get out" kick once all other avenues have been looked at, as it stands you are right, he is our first option and our get out is to Pop or Punky (Gunno is normally somewhere on the wing or in that high half froward role).
Our forward set up is totally inept, but we all know that. Burns is the man who is in charge, a great defender.