Round 2 Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

300 from 3.. (Houli, Cotchin and Martin)
Taking Cotchin over Murphy is an early regret, but not gonna trade a player of Cotchin's ilk
 
Caddy only went at 55%, had an extra clanger and managed an 81 or something.
A few things. Caddy isn't shit. :p


And given Geelong won by 6 goals scaling would have favoured them. Also I think given that Caddy gets his own hard balls CD are more sympathetic with the metric they use when he gets a bad kick away. Don't forget there are hardball/loose ball gets and the type of mark plays a huge difference when it comes to the score you get.
 
Not even **** teddy hopkins could, because it's a sham.

because he did sweet FA in the last qtr, weighting of points as the game got closer increased. so points in the 1st 3 qtrs are actually worth less

its not rocket science FFS
 
Not really, Lingy said tonight 65% is average for a team.
Sure. But remember over half the teams playing are terrible and that there are 550+ players in the AFL. The guys who are Supercoach worthy would be in the top 10% of that. So for SC 65% is shite... at a guess.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Macrae of course.

Absolutely the same, one of those two options for me.
Will wait on Macreas game and watch replay sections of tonights - but gee M. Thomas looks like a serious cash cow at his price.
And I forecast no change in his role at all :thumbsu:
 
3/313. Not great but in line with my expectations. Really need to nail my captain choice this week and hope for a few more 120+ scores.
 
Absolutely the same, one of those two options for me.
Will wait on Macreas game and which replay sections of tonights - but gee M. Thomas looks like a serious cash cow at his price.
And I forecast no change in his role at all :thumbsu:
Well, if someone else spuds it up, you could always get both. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top