Round 6 Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wait, why are we trading Bennell? Cos he's just smashed out a 146 and is averaging 100...

He'll only be out 1 week, surely. Not worth the trade whilst you've got anchors like Goodes, Newnes, Lamb, I'd think? Even Salem *might* hit his BE this week (though I axed him for Pendles).
 
Thanks Toxic , ideally I wish to hold Hogan abit longer but I think Salem has pretty much hit his ceiling..

I've just reversed my 1st trade (Bennel > Pendles), I have $373,700 in the bank

Here are the options i'm faced with:

Option 1
Bennell > Hannebery
Salem > Danger or JPK (via Gray)

Originally, I had Bennell > Pendles but this wouldn't allow me to move on Salem

Option 2
Bennell > Pendlebury
CEY > Danger or JPK

Option 3
Bennell > Pendles
Salem > Buddy

What you think?

View attachment 131950
id actually hold bennell. i know its not what you want to hear. but i reckon hes a gun.
 
Thanks Toxic , ideally I wish to hold Hogan abit longer but I think Salem has pretty much hit his ceiling..

I've just reversed my 1st trade (Bennel > Pendles), I have $373,700 in the bank

Here are the options i'm faced with:

Option 1
Bennell > Hannebery
Salem > Danger or JPK (via Gray)

Originally, I had Bennell > Pendles but this wouldn't allow me to move on Salem

Option 2
Bennell > Pendlebury
CEY > Danger or JPK

Option 3
Bennell > Pendles
Salem > Buddy

What you think?

View attachment 131950

I'd rather hang on to Bennell for the season than Andrew Swallow.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Thanks Toxic , ideally I wish to hold Hogan abit longer but I think Salem has pretty much hit his ceiling..

I've just reversed my 1st trade (Bennel > Pendles), I have $373,700 in the bank

Here are the options i'm faced with:

Option 1
Bennell > Hannebery
Salem > Danger or JPK (via Gray)

Originally, I had Bennell > Pendles but this wouldn't allow me to move on Salem

Option 2
Bennell > Pendlebury
CEY > Danger or JPK

Option 3
Bennell > Pendles
Salem > Buddy

What you think?

View attachment 131950
cey to pendles. one trade.
 
right now form isnt really the issue
there perma players. all 4 of those should average more than shiel for the rest of the year imo.

Hmmm, food for thought. Starting to lean towards Sloane now. Do you have an opinion re Sloane v jpk v beams?Sloane or jpk in particular. Cheers for the input btw, very helpful.
 
Is Geary to Yeo just trading one problem to another or is the Yeo in the guts move going to continue to produce decent scores?

Yes, I would wait a week or 2 and trade for B. Smith for less than 100k. I have Geary as well and will be doing the same trade.
 
Thanks Toxic , ideally I wish to hold Hogan abit longer but I think Salem has pretty much hit his ceiling..

I've just reversed my 1st trade (Bennel > Pendles), I have $373,700 in the bank

Here are the options i'm faced with:

Option 1
Bennell > Hannebery
Salem > Danger or JPK (via Gray)

Originally, I had Bennell > Pendles but this wouldn't allow me to move on Salem

Option 2
Bennell > Pendlebury
CEY > Danger or JPK

Option 3
Bennell > Pendles
Salem > Buddy

What you think?

View attachment 131950

SO in terms of cows about to be culled and rookies coming along

is it Salem then Hogan then....???

I dont like the option of getting rid of Bennell tbh
 
I can trade any Midfield Pre by Moving Gray to forward line for Salem, I already have Pendles, Selwood, Fyfe, Griffen, J Steven, was thinking about Watson Boak or JPK??
 
Hmmm, food for thought. Starting to lean towards Sloane now. Do you have an opinion re Sloane v jpk v beams?Sloane or jpk in particular. Cheers for the input btw, very helpful.
sloane has a high be and seems like 5% injured. wait a week or 2 on him.
jpk has played some strong teams, they have lost a higher ratio of games than they will for the rest of the year. would expect this is about his bottom price.
 
LOCKED IN

CEY --> Glenn
Goodes --> McDonald (may change to Pittard or Picken before 7pm, but McDonald is in hot hot form)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Why would you bring in Glenn after only one game?

to facilitate another trade based on break evens / league matches / loophole opportunities / upgrades / 2 trades already planned for next week

multiple reasons possible

to simply dismiss the concept based on the "he's only played 1 week" is naive and shortsighted imho
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top