- Aug 17, 2006
- 23,639
- 22,190
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Re: 2011 SC Defenders Discussion Thread
I agree, I'm keeping him. I agree with Craig, but you could say the same thing about a lot of rangy hbf-types (Mackie's an example from my team, Mattner and Andrew Walker would be others). Yeah, he'd be a prototype sub, but I can't see there being any such thing as a designated sub. It's not like a sixth man in basketball. He'll only be picked as the sub if he's the 22nd player in the side (which he may be at the start of the year, but I'm banking on him working his way into form).
I haven't had Otten at any stage but I don't really see Craig stating the obvious re sub makes for such a big change in opinion. I'm sure Heppell, Hibberd, Toy etc will be subs at some stage as well. Clubs won't use the same sub every week because the player in question will lose match conditioning.
I agree, I'm keeping him. I agree with Craig, but you could say the same thing about a lot of rangy hbf-types (Mackie's an example from my team, Mattner and Andrew Walker would be others). Yeah, he'd be a prototype sub, but I can't see there being any such thing as a designated sub. It's not like a sixth man in basketball. He'll only be picked as the sub if he's the 22nd player in the side (which he may be at the start of the year, but I'm banking on him working his way into form).