If the umpires were trying to rig the game in the dogs favour why the hell would they elect to pay deliberate on Caleb Daniel 30m from goal to give Brisbane the chance to take the lead? In what was a blatantly terrible decision? Can that be answered
Oh spare me the Caleb Daniel call…
Thats been called 9 out of 10 times if you’ve watched any football this year.
Or is that one that usually goes the dogs way usually as well? I haven’t watched all your games. But you could be that 1 out of 10.
Must be nice.
If that single free kick, that was 90% there, is what balances out the lopsided free kick count in a tight final in your mind then that’s fine but the last thing I would ever complain or question anything about if I was a bulldogs supporter would be the umpiring.