The trade to GWS?No he isnt.
Picks 10, 11 and 18 for Bolton , 14 and a future 3rd is a massive price.
Bolton is quality, done get me wrong. This could end up like the Jesse Hogan trade.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The trade to GWS?No he isnt.
Picks 10, 11 and 18 for Bolton , 14 and a future 3rd is a massive price.
Bolton is quality, done get me wrong. This could end up like the Jesse Hogan trade.
Imo, Longmuir knows its an important year for him & Bolton is very much a need for your team... & Richmond knew this & fleeced you significant overs. 10 & 18 was more than fair imo.No he isnt.
Picks 10, 11 and 18 for Bolton , 14 and a future 3rd is a massive price.
Bolton is quality, done get me wrong. This could end up like the Jesse Hogan trade.
Boom!Surely not. Id be expecting 14 back
You really, really remind me of me in 2016. Giving away all our draft capital for a bunch of B graders and a perennially injured midfielder after missing the finals. Expecting the same old again, and again, and again.No he isnt.
Picks 10, 11 and 18 for Bolton , 14 and a future 3rd is a massive price.
Bolton is quality, done get me wrong. This could end up like the Jesse Hogan trade.
Sure, it could go wrong but the situation is vastly different to Hogan trade.No he isnt.
Picks 10, 11 and 18 for Bolton , 14 and a future 3rd is a massive price.
Bolton is quality, done get me wrong. This could end up like the Jesse Hogan trade.
If 10 and 18 is more than fair, I'm not sure 11 for 14 and 37 pushes it to fleeced and significant overs. 37 won't move much if at all next year with bidding changes.Imo, Longmuir knows its an important year for him & Bolton is very much a need for your team... & Richmond knew this & fleeced you significant overs. 10 & 18 was more than fair imo.
At least you didn't give up a top 3 pick for Baker as that was nuts.
Plus while its complicated to work out we traded 2 seconds for the Port pick and we got a first and two seconds for Henry and Shultz. In trade capital by my estimates we are basically a 4 pick downgrade (our 10 going to 14) off trading Henry and Shultz for Bolton. WE may even get the player we would have picked at 10 at 14 if we get Berry.If 10 and 18 is more than fair, I'm not sure 11 for 14 and 37 pushes it to fleeced and significant overs. 37 won't move much if at all next year with bidding changes.
Looking at draft boards, 14 is the very end of that band 2 of players ss well so it's not the worst drop
I think the entire club knows it's an important year, we've been slowly building this list and accumulating assets while keeping cap flexibility for years to land a big fish like Bolton.Imo, Longmuir knows its an important year for him & Bolton is very much a need for your team... & Richmond knew this & fleeced you significant overs. 10 & 18 was more than fair imo.
At least you didn't give up a top 3 pick for Baker as that was nuts.
There were rumours of them paying 100-200k but I don't think I've seen anything official which suggests to me we have probably taken it all on.Bolton is a jet and I believe Freo will be top 4 next year. Just wondering if Richmond are paying some of his salary, as was forecast in the lead-up to the trade? There has been no mention of it as regards to him and Rioli.