Trade Requested Shai Bolton [UFA 2028] - Wants to join the Dockers

[Moist Biscuit]

2 points.

Firstly, those picks will all move back by the time they're used in the draft, so it's probably more like 12/13/21

Secondly, Richmond and Freo are positioned on 12/13 and 12/21 for Bolton currently...split the difference and Baker becomes worth ~17. Throw in a late pick like 51 (which would become Freo's 2nd pick after this) and you'd be looking around pick 30 in value.

Pick 51 is a nothing pick, doesnt hold any real value. If 11, 12 and 18 are on offer for Bolton and Baker, I would want a pick around 30 back to even consider it.

 

[fargothegreat]

Why would Richmond take 10,11,18 if

Richmond value Shai at 10,11
Fremantle value Baker Pick 10

Fremantle need to go get Essendon's Pick 9 to add to 10,11 to get both

Fremantle get Baker, Bolton
Richmond get 9,10,11
Essendon get 18 F1 Fremantle 30

If Baker agrees, Richmond will accept 10, 11 and 18 for both.

The problem atm is that Baker still wants to get to WC.

 

[dean33]

Pick 51 is a nothing pick, doesnt hold any real value. If 11, 12 and 18 are on offer for Bolton and Baker, I would want a pick around 30 back to even consider it.

Sorry we already traded pick 32 to Brisbane. We do have 51, 61, 70 and 76 though. Take your pick.

 

[King Huskii]

Fremantle values Baker at 10, and West Coast values him at Pick 14

Bigfooty values him at , who cares?

He's uncontracted you numpty

 

[King Huskii]

If Baker agrees, Richmond will accept 10, 11 and 18 for both.

The problem atm is that Baker still wants to get to WC.

You make a lot more sense than he does

 

[dean33]

He's uncontracted you numpty

Still need appease richmond with a trade though. More chance of me getting drafted this year than bakes going into the psd.

 

[Farang83150]

Pick 51 is a nothing pick, doesnt hold any real value. If 11, 12 and 18 are on offer for Bolton and Baker, I would want a pick around 30 back to even consider it.

They'd definitely have to throw in a future 2/3rnd coming back.

 

[Dockeroo]

Why would Richmond take 10,11,18 if

Richmond value Shai at 10,11
Fremantle value Baker Pick 10

Fremantle need to go get Essendon's Pick 9 to add to 10,11 to get both

Fremantle get Baker, Bolton
Richmond get 9,10,11
Essendon get 18 F1 Fremantle 30

Put down the crackpipe you fool

 

[WilloTree]

Why would Richmond take 10,11,18 if

Richmond value Shai at 10,11
Fremantle value Baker Pick 10

Fremantle need to go get Essendon's Pick 9 to add to 10,11 to get both

Fremantle get Baker, Bolton
Richmond get 9,10,11
Essendon get 18 F1 Fremantle 30

Dat you Danstar?

 

[PurpleGreenRed]

They'd definitely have to throw in a future 2/3rnd coming back.

Pick 20 probably...practically a second rounder as it is

 

[Tony_Clifton]

I swear to god, we had better only be appearing to offer 10, 11 and 18 to drive up Baker's price.

 

[King Huskii]

Still need appease richmond with a trade though. More chance of me getting drafted this year than bakes going into the psd.

You'd like to think so

 

[Waterhouzin]

If it’s 10, 11 and 18 it’s still way too much for both.
Values Bolton at 10 + 11 (waaaaay to high) and Baker at 18 (closer but probs upper limit)

I think a fair deal, that is still on the Tigers beneficial side, would be

10, 11, 18, 30
For
Baker, Bolton and 20

Great hand for Tigers and allows Freo to still take a pick in the first round meaning we’ll satisfy the AFL’s requirement for a first round pick every few years.
If we go hard for the Chad next year (assuming the AFL plan of allowing 2 years futures to be traded kicks in) we’ll likely need to give up first round picks in 2025, 26 and 27
No way we could do that without a first round pick this year.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[King Huskii]

If it’s 10, 11 and 18 it’s still way too much for both.
Values Bolton at 10 + 11 (waaaaay to high) and Baker at 18 (closer but probs upper limit)

I think a fair deal, that is still on the Tigers beneficial side, would be

10, 11, 18, 30
For
Baker, Bolton and 20

Great hand for Tigers and allows Freo to still take a pick in the first round meaning we’ll satisfy the AFL’s requirement for a first round pick every few years.
If we go hard for the Chad next year (assuming the AFL plan of allowing 2 years futures to be traded kicks in) we’ll likely need to give up first round picks in 2025, 26 and 27
No way we could do that without a first round pick this year.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

That makes sense to me

And Walls would need to nail that pick