Hey BSA, I'm a visitor to this thread but what's the issue with offering money to 18 & 19 year olds as long as they are out of juniors and moving into seniors. If they are any good there current club should be trying to keep them I would like to think. What I've found is clubs can overlook there own. What we found was to sign them to contacts near the end of there season in 18s. Most kids then feel appreciated and often sign for "fair" payments as they are your future.
On another note will Port Colts coming into the SFL affect SK City in any way? I know they are in div2 but SK City had that area to themselves yes!
Might not be a problem offering money to 18 and 19 years old to play seniors but its a different story offering money to 16 & 17 years old school kids to play U19s. With many suburban clubs in the mire because of inflated payments this sort of conduct hardly promotes a healthy culture of loyalty.
Having been lured on the promise of payment what to think these kids will do when another club offers more money?
Last edited: