St Kilda are Due

Remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by BonIsGood
Wait a sec... are you saying Fletcher and this Embley you speak of has something over Ball and Dal Santo???? Are you for real...........................................?????????????????????????


Mate please watch on Sunday PLEASE with BOTH EYES OPEN.

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

EMBLEY?HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

This is why we are a chance to win..... people like you who have no idea outside your little St Kilda cocoon.

Lets compare these 2 players shall we... and lets see how laughable Andrew Embley is.


2004
Embley: Height 190cm Weight: 88kg
Dal Santo: Height 185cm Weight: 83kg

Dal Santo: 19 poss per game.
Embley: 18 poss per game.

Embley: 41 marks for year.
Dal Santo: 38 marks for year.

Embley: 7 goals.
Dal Santo: 1 goal.


Tell you what... you can keep Dal Santo... and his 1 extra handball per game... We have a 190cm running midfielder who can go down forward take a grab and kick goals.... Dal Santo can't.
 
Originally posted by Mark Viduka
This is why we are a chance to win..... people like you who have no idea outside your little St Kilda cocoon.

Lets compare these 2 players shall we... and lets see how laughable Andrew Embley is.


2004
Embley: Height 190cm Weight: 88kg
Dal Santo: Height 185cm Weight: 83kg

Dal Santo: 19 poss per game.
Embley: 18 poss per game.

Embley: 41 marks for year.
Dal Santo: 38 marks for year.

Embley: 7 goals.
Dal Santo: 1 goal.


Tell you what... you can keep Dal Santo... and his 1 extra handball per game... We have a 190cm running midfielder who can go down forward take a grab and kick goals.... Dal Santo can't.

Still want Fletcher over Dal???

Apart from Cousins and Judd your team is a bunch of patchetic wooses.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Originally posted by BonIsGood
Still want Fletcher over Dal???

Apart from Cousins and Judd your team is a bunch of patchetic wooses.

Enjoy it while it lasts. Only a matter of time until you're claiming concession picks again and crying out for AFL financial assistance (or will the bandwagon stick around, BonIsGood?)
 
Originally posted by RIPPER_46
Judge judy was a concession pick. That aurgument doesn't stick.

Well with or without concession picks we'd still have had Judd. Now, if Sampi was one of our best players you'd have an argument worth having.

Still you guys would have looked pretty stupid if you'd been left with Croad as the only benefit of your coming last wouldn't you?
 
Originally posted by Mr Q
Still you guys would have looked pretty stupid if you'd been left with Croad as the only benefit of your coming last wouldn't you?

Yeah, we would have. What's your point?










Oh, that's right. You haven't got one. Enjoy the game on Saturday?
 
Originally posted by The Mission Man
Are we still talking about Wirrpunda? I mean he's chunky but I wouldn't have said he was fat.

<Mead gasps in awe at your hilarity. Taking one comment on a thread and applying it at random to an entirely different topic- brilliant, how ever did you think of that?>
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Originally posted by Mead
<Mead gasps in awe at your hilarity. Taking one comment on a thread and applying it at random to an entirely different topic- brilliant, how ever did you think of that?>

Referring to yourself in the third person is a tad unusual, don't you think? Trent Croad does it, which should be warning enough.

You really should relax your pants. You're verging on the hysterical.
 
Originally posted by The Mission Man
Referring to yourself in the third person is a tad unusual, don't you think? Trent Croad does it, which should be warning enough.

You really should relax your pants. You're verging on the hysterical.

So does Disco Stu, which as a segue to the latter part of your comments, should suggest that Mead is unable to relax his pants due to his happenin flares.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

St Kilda are Due

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top