Man - talk about kicking a club when they are down.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.Is this from that Roy Morgan poll that routinely reports Sydney has a billion supporters?
Small clubs never grow. Big clubs stay big.They’ve always been small, not sure what the OP means when he says they used to be bigger.
They grow a bit in popularity when they’re going well as all clubs do, but then revert.
They have a very unsuccessful history which makes things hard.
St Kilda was a poor location as they had no natural area to expand into for supporters, much like South Melbourne and Melbourne.
They relocated to Moorabbin in the 60s to attempt to address this, which did have an impact. They were able to play there until the 90s when all the suburban grounds were closed.
I think they should look to relocate again, probably to Frankston, as their best bet would be to attempt to do what Geelong has been able to do on the other side of the bay. It’s a decades-long project but one that would be worth it if done right. Find the cheapest and easiest way to get Frankston Park to 15k and host two games there against small interstate sides. Take it from there. The outer south-east and the peninsula is an enormous area.
Think the lowest it's gone in the 18-team era is 14k (in a wooden spoon year and when crowds were down across the league, vs GWS)... which is about 5k less than what some of the big clubs have managed.North play their low drawing crowds in Tasmania. They'd be lucky to clear 10k for those games in Melbourne.
Of course its being debated. Your argument now is that he didn't want to have a discussion with four people and you are now claiming that that was the whole formal process.Defies logic?
That's literally what happened. He didn't want to go through a formal process.
I don't think that's being debated is it?
Small clubs never grow. Big clubs stay big.
For the life of me, I don't know why people think that relocating to some random suburb somewhere will suddenly grow their supporter base?
How many people do you know that have ever changed teams (aside from me)? Very, very few.
How many kids DON'T barrack for their mum or dad's team? Very few.
So where are all these 100s of 1000s of supporters supposed to come from? Immigrants?
How many immigrants will financially support an AFL team? Very few.
And even if a small club does magically discover 50000 new members under a rock somewhere - they're still not going to grow as fast as the big clubs that get primetime games every week.
Happy to be corrected by someone familiar with Melbourne demographics, but I thought the Bulldogs were in a locality with lot of migrants, and hence this presented an opportunity for us to spread our code to new converts? Also Bulldogs have Ballarat as their secondary market, and all parties seem happy with that arrangement?St Kilda have more members than North/Bulldogs. The interesting one for me is the Bulldogs - they've won a premiership in the last 10 years and yet they trail behind St Kilda in membership, and have only a few thousand members more than North.
You have to wonder what their crowds and membership could dip to if they went through an unsuccessful period.
What are you talking about??Of course its being debated. Your argument now is that he didn't want to have a discussion with four people and you are now claiming that that was the whole formal process.
Ross Lyon goes on Footy Classified and gushes about how keen he is on the Carlton job. The next week he pulls out because (according to you) he didn't want to have a discussion with four people who (according to you) would then recommend him for the job.
There were plenty of people at the time who stated that at least two Carlton board members had specific concerns about the Fremantle payout to a female staff member that had claimed that Lyon had harassed her. There was plenty of discussion at the time that any appointment would not have been ratified unless these concerns were met.
I am not claiming that I have spoken to a specific board member although being an anonymous internet forum I suppose that I could. However I am very confident in knowing that the board were highly unlikely to ratify him as senior coach without certain concerns being dealt with. .
Of course that's what he said.What are you talking about??
Lyon said publicly that he withdrew from the Carlton coaching job because he didn't want to go through the formal process.
St Kilda have more members than North/Bulldogs. The interesting one for me is the Bulldogs - they've won a premiership in the last 10 years and yet they trail behind St Kilda in membership, and have only a few thousand members more than North.
You have to wonder what their crowds and membership could dip to if they went through an unsuccessful period.
You just need to look at who North have played in their Docklands home games. 4 Melbourne clubs and Fremantle as their 1st home game of the seasonNorth play their low drawing crowds in Tasmania. They'd be lucky to clear 10k for those games in Melbourne.
Whether he nobbled them all along or not, he'd be mad not to at this point.Lyon is making a dash for the draft. Nobbling the saints in 2024, to stash up.
Watch them go in 25.
No I didn't.So you have claimed that the formal process was talking to a 4 person sub committee who would ratify the decision.
Are you sure you're talking to the right person??Of course that's what he said.
Doesn't make it true though.
So you have claimed that the formal process was talking to a 4 person sub committee who would ratify the decision.
So either 1) Ross says I'm far too important to do this .I don't have the time to talk to this sub committee who are going to ratify my new job. Despite just telling the world that I want this job. I officially withdraw.
OR
2) The president tells Ross "sorry mate, I thought that I had the board on side but they're making some noise about wanting answers about what happened with the allegations at Freo. They want to have a chat about it if it's O.K. with you" Ross says "No way mate, I'm not going there. I can still get paid to be a media performer and another bus will arrive sooner or later".
Clearly you believe option 1. Doesn't make it true though.
But the small clubs have grown over decades and decades - they just grow at a far lower rate than the historically big clubs.It won’t suddenly grow their supporter base. It will take decades and decades.
People will eventually support a club that is playing on their doorstep.
This is not a comment on which club is bigger than another, of which I have no idea, but just wanted to say that you can read two fifths of **** all into member numbers given the way they're tallied from club to club.St Kilda have more members than North/Bulldogs. The interesting one for me is the Bulldogs - they've won a premiership in the last 10 years and yet they trail behind St Kilda in membership, and have only a few thousand members more than North.
You have to wonder what their crowds and membership could dip to if they went through an unsuccessful period.
Surely the Seaford debacle means they've burned a lot of bridges in that area already.I think they should look to relocate again, probably to Frankston, as their best bet would be to attempt to do what Geelong has been able to do on the other side of the bay. It’s a decades-long project but one that would be worth it if done right. Find the cheapest and easiest way to get Frankston Park to 15k and host two games there against small interstate sides. Take it from there. The outer south-east and the peninsula is an enormous area.
That's not the full story either though. Against that revenue the three clubs reported the following expenses in 2023:This is not a comment on which club is bigger than another, of which I have no idea, but just wanted to say that you can read two fifths of **** all into member numbers given the way they're tallied from club to club.
In 2023:
Not exactly sure if the revenue figures are comparing apples with apples given the description in the St Kilda financial report was "membership and reserved seats" compared to just "membership" for the others, so they may or may not have included that reserved seat figure here also or perhaps otherwise in gate receipts? What does seem clear is North's membership revenue is significantly lower than the other two clubs.
- Western Bulldogs had 56,302 members and a reported membership revenue of $9.4mil.
- North Melbourne had 51,084 members and reported membership revenue of $6.9mil.
- St Kilda had 60,239 members and a reported membership and reserved seats revenue of $9.8mil.