I see you have moved on from the Hawthorn thread onto the St Kilda one
Stay on topic here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I see you have moved on from the Hawthorn thread onto the St Kilda one
obviously not great news on max king but is not all bad for team going forward. they can now use the last 8 weeks to see how the forwadline can potentially look without king. maybe they get more out of some other players with a more unpredictable setup.
whoever, i am not familiar with the saints list.Membrey??
Honestly rather see us play someone that hasn't debuted yet like Heath or Keeler instead of MembreyMembrey??
Not defending St Kilda at all but your very keen to express your opinion on easy targets. What exactly has your team achieved since the start of the century?Stay on topic here
Not defending St Kilda at all but your very keen to express your opinion on easy targets. What exactly has your team achieved since the start of the century?
Honestly rather see us play someone that hasn't debuted yet like Heath or Keeler instead of Membrey
Whatever floats your boat I guess.St.Kilda’s in the AFL mate.
It’s all a part of the game.
No discounts from opposition supporters for being shithouse …
One of the worst picks we've seen lol.Perhaps Matt Allison who's been rotting away at Sandy until his inevitable delisting could get a run.
Doubt it though.
No purely hypothetical, just couldn’t answer it myself. Would I want a proven star for 3 more years or would I take the risk of this guys potential?Any particular reason why you are suggesting such a trade?
Yep donuts. TypicalSt.Kilda thread … stay on topic
An old adage but absolutely true is that the biggest mistake a club can make is to misjudge where their list is at. Saints guilty of this more than once.Club was wrong about the list.
Ross is right.
Funnily enough the club being wrong arguably got Ratten needlessly fired to get him the job.
Open question...It's worrying how King can't seem to stay on the field.
If you look at the past 7 seasons including his TAC Cup year with Sandringham in 2018, there's only 3 seasons out of 7 where he's managed to play consistently.
2018 - ACL in April, missed most of the Under 18 year
2019 - Played about 5 games in the VFL and had ankle injury
2020 - 2022 he managed to play most of the season
2023 and 2024 there's been multiple major injuries (out for months) and multiple moderate ones (out for a few weeks). By the end of 2024 he will have played 23 of 47 games across 2023 and 2024 (including the one he got injured 20 seconds into the game against Melbourne. So really, 22 games from 47)
This lack of durability is pretty concerning.
A disaster?
Why?
Weird question but would you trade Jeremy Cameron for Max King?
I thought they've been relatively healthy to their core players. Steele, Marshall, Sinclair don't miss much. Yes, King has been injury prone and Coffield / Clark were/are perennial injured but neither were actually Best 22 players given their lack of development through injury. Zak Jones is... Zac Jones. Think they've had a very healthy run at it all things considered.Is it me, or do they always seem to have a horrid injury list?
Seems to have been going on for years.
Yeah, maybe.I thought they've been relatively healthy to their core players. Steele, Marshall, Sinclair don't miss much. Yes, King has been injury prone and Coffield / Clark were/are perennial injured but neither were actually Best 22 players given their lack of development through injury. Zak Jones is... Zac Jones. Think they've had a very healthy run at it all things considered.
Part of the formal process was that he had to present to and be interviewed by the board.But what does that have to with him having to go through a formal process?
What you just described, if true, happened outside of any formal process.
Not going through a formal process, does not mean that there is no process.
Marshall was bruised but didn't miss any games. Sinclair missed round 1 but has played since then. Steele didn't miss a game last year but did have a sore shoulder and stopped tackling for a while.Yeah, maybe.
I thought they were basically fielding a ressies team for the first half last year.
Didn't Steele do a collarbone last year and miss a chunk? And Sinclair missed the start of this year didn't he?
I thought I remembered Marshall busting his foot recently?
Steele missed 3 games with the collarbone. Sinclair missed rd1 after calf issues in the preseason. Probably would have played if we didn't have a 5 day turn around into the next game.Yeah, maybe.
I thought they were basically fielding a ressies team for the first half last year.
Didn't Steele do a collarbone last year and miss a chunk? And Sinclair missed the start of this year didn't he?
I thought I remembered Marshall busting his foot recently?
Open question...
How much of that is due to putting a skinny kid in the role of key forward?
And not a Roaming, Up The Ground type key forward - but the Deep F50 one that is expected to crash packs and gets crunched multiple times each game by multiple large mature Key Position Defenders?
I was critical of St Kilda in how they used and developed McCartin, and part of me sees a similar thing happening with King.
They draft these guys because of their prodigious talent and ability - then try to use them as wrecking balls.
Strange.
It's no wonder they break down early.
Why are you telling me this?Part of the formal process was that he had to present to and be interviewed by the board.
Prior to that as Sayers mate and, in the belief that the job was his, he was all in. Once he was asked go through the formal process he bailed out.
You can argue as to why he bailed out but there is no argument that his attitude towards the job changed significantly once he was asked to do more than simply being handed the job.