FR0GGY
From a cartel villa in Tuscany
Whoo made it past the first round thanks wright
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Whoo made it past the first round thanks wright
He had the most picks this week at 16 :/And who got immunity for having Callinan as their pick?
I had him as my sub, but Walker got me through to next week as my main pick. Now we need him to kick 3 goals at least in the last to give us a sniff
Already ditched the sub rule Carl?Crouch - Jared Petrenko (Taylor Walker) no goal
Jars458 - Jared Petrenko (Matthew Wright) no goal
Stripple - Jared Petrenko (Taylor Walker) no goal
So 51 out of 59 tipsters go through to the next round, 16 of them with a priceless Immunity Card up the sleeve.
Just Walker (SUB Callinan) will do you. If Walker starts as the sub or pulls out before the game, Callinan is your man.
Carl did ask to make sure everyone was clear on the rules.
Sigh. How did you win this thing?Pets started as the sub though, so those 3 posters get their backup. Walker and Wright both kicked goals, so they should still be in
Sigh. How did you win this thing?
Wrong.
Please everyone read the rules again.
I was surprised that more people didn't use the SUB option.So re-reading the rules I need to go Petrenko (SUB Wright) (Wright)?
Do you really think 90% of people would have only have done the late replacement while 5% would have gone the substitute option?
And no one did both to cover their arse?
I think it's obvious for anyone with a full brain that the rules wern't clear and now 3 people are being punished due to a misunderstanding.
I for one was keeping a track of the competition as each goal was kicked, and before the game had started I changed the selections of the 3 that went with Petrenko to Walker and Wright. That was my understanding of the rule.
You still don't understand!The whole OP was fine print!
It just dragged on!
And I think everybody kinda agrees. Surely someone, just one person would have read it all and known they needed to go Wright (SUB Callinan) (Callinan) to cover all options. The fact that nobody went this path shows that there was a misunderstanding.
When I saw your post mid voting I thought you were kinda ******ed because I had thought just about everybody had overed the SUB. Obviously I misunderstood what you were on about and it seems others did as well.
I don't think the rules could be simple enough for you to understand them.I finally understand, you're like today's AFL
Year 1 - Create a plan, then make rules on the run
Year 2 - Create new rules to try and mask the problems from the previous years rules
Is next years rule "There are no rules"?
The league would make alot more sense if it was simple, you know, like pick the goal kicker or you're out, no picking the same guy twice.
Letting people in mid-season created problems, then letting people back in, then creating rules to cover up complaining people who made a poor decision. The first 2 should never have happened (and yes, I was the benefitiary of one) and the latter 2 should have just been told 'tough luck'. Your new rules are just like the holding the ball decision, no people playing the game have any idea what you're going to do. I half expect you to now allow what ever is inside the parentheses to over both sub and withdrawals now.
I say we go back to game 1 selecting now, let the 3 who made a mistake go through because they just got bitten on the butt by our very own AD. But back to being simple, 2 rules.
1) Select a goal kicker each week or you're eliminated
2) No using the same player twice or you're disqualified
Is that you Geish?I don't think the rules could be simple enough for you to understand them.
Just spotted this bit...I half expect you to now allow what ever is inside the parentheses to over both sub and withdrawals now.