Oppo Camp The Loony Bin - Lead Sponsor of Crazy Topkent's Alternate Adventures

Remove this Banner Ad

Think you need ground rules PG.

  • The Shane Crawford rule - Filmed for media doesn’t count. No Footy Show, Bounce or Front Bar clips that were created for the show.
  • The Ben Cousins rule - Must be while they were on a list.
  • The Jack Riewoldt rule - Must be intending to show off for the cameras - no running from a media pack embarrassment.
 
Think you need ground rules PG.

  • The Shane Crawford rule - Filmed for media doesn’t count. No Footy Show, Bounce or Front Bar clips that were created for the show.
  • The Ben Cousins rule - Must be while they were on a list.
  • The Jack Riewoldt rule - Must be intending to show off for the cameras - no running from a media pack embarrassment.
Or the Alan Didak/Christopher Husdon rule where there has to be photographic evidence, not just verbal recollections or hearsay.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Our very own Frothies May at full back for getting caught on film sinking pints while in rehab, and Hogan at FF for his durry smoking at festivals would be great bookends
 
Our very own Frothies May at full back for getting caught on film sinking pints while in rehab, and Hogan at FF for his durry smoking at festivals would be great bookends
Wattsy’s German powder snorting too, even if it was just sugar or something.
 
Our very own Frothies May at full back for getting caught on film sinking pints while in rehab, and Hogan at FF for his durry smoking at festivals would be great bookends
I would argue Frothies ineligible under the Jack Riewoldt rule.
We don’t want blokes getting done for being papped, this is about them being egotistical enough to get themselves on film intentionally
 
If this was NRL you could pick 3 squads!
If it was the NRL you could run a three way round robin for State of Idiocy Origin - Team Booze, Team Drugs and Team Dicks
 
dae7fa56592e96ad6f802838f3d3693e.jpg


It's a conspiracy 🤭


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I liked this one from the Tigers board. We’ve had the whinging about umpires corruptly paying frees and 50-metre penalties against Richmond, we’ve had the conviction that the AFL changed rules to disrupt the unstoppable force of Richmond.

I like this one for identifying a far more dangerous and insidious way to undermine Richmond:

“I would love to know the difference opposition teams get to move the ball on compared to us as well as how much deviation teams are allowed for moving slightly off their line. I also love to know how many times we get called to play on for 'not 15' for kicks that travel the same distance as other teams who don't get it called.”
 
I liked this one from the Tigers board. We’ve had the whinging about umpires corruptly paying frees and 50-metre penalties against Richmond, we’ve had the conviction that the AFL changed rules to disrupt the unstoppable force of Richmond.

I like this one for identifying a far more dangerous and insidious way to undermine Richmond:

“I would love to know the difference opposition teams get to move the ball on compared to us as well as how much deviation teams are allowed for moving slightly off their line. I also love to know how many times we get called to play on for 'not 15' for kicks that travel the same distance as other teams who don't get it called.”
Looking forward to this poster to putting the research in and exposing the AFL once and for all.
 
I wish I could find the one about Collingwood stealing their game plan now. Makes sense. Team plays well = must have copied Richmond
I kind of get this. As Craig McRae was an assistant coach at Richmond from 2017-2020 and probably came up with a lot of the gameplan during their flag years. So in that regard, he could have copied his own work.
 
I kind of get this. As Craig McRae was an assistant coach at Richmond from 2017-2020 and probably came up with a lot of the gameplan during their flag years. So in that regard, he could have copied his own work.
It falls apart when you realise Collingwood play nothing like Richmond in their flag years though.
 
It falls apart when you realise Collingwood play nothing like Richmond in their flag years though.
Yeah. Plus they reckoned Melbourne stole Richmond’s game plan to win a flag. It’s an amazing cognitive dissonance to think that the rules were changed to ruin the game plan, but then for some reason Melbourne copied it
 
I'm self reporting on this one.

Every week afl.com.au puts out a 'Top 10' moments of the week. Shit like this:


We're at round 5, and not a single positive Dees moment has been featured. The closest we've got was the lights going out at the Gabba. Did they include anything from our 5 goals to nil after play returned from that game? Nup. Melk hitting one from the centre square against the Dogs? Nah. Chandler nailing a couple of shots on the run from a tight angle in the pocket? Nope. BBB with the checkside also against the Dogs? No way. Oliver picking Ladhams' pocket leading to the Fritsch snap? Just ignored.

I'm on to you afl.com.au. You clearly have an anti-Dees bias here :rage:
 
I'm self reporting on this one.

Every week afl.com.au puts out a 'Top 10' moments of the week. s**t like this:


We're at round 5, and not a single positive Dees moment has been featured. The closest we've got was the lights going out at the Gabba. Did they include anything from our 5 goals to nil after play returned from that game? Nup. Melk hitting one from the centre square against the Dogs? Nah. Chandler nailing a couple of shots on the run from a tight angle in the pocket? Nope. BBB with the checkside also against the Dogs? No way. Oliver picking Ladhams' pocket leading to the Fritsch snap? Just ignored.

I'm on to you afl.com.au. You clearly have an anti-Dees bias here :rage:
I mean, we played shit and lost this week...

Spargo ducking into a concussion only thing I can think of that could have qualified?
 
I'm self reporting on this one.

Every week afl.com.au puts out a 'Top 10' moments of the week. s**t like this:


We're at round 5, and not a single positive Dees moment has been featured. The closest we've got was the lights going out at the Gabba. Did they include anything from our 5 goals to nil after play returned from that game? Nup. Melk hitting one from the centre square against the Dogs? Nah. Chandler nailing a couple of shots on the run from a tight angle in the pocket? Nope. BBB with the checkside also against the Dogs? No way. Oliver picking Ladhams' pocket leading to the Fritsch snap? Just ignored.

I'm on to you afl.com.au. You clearly have an anti-Dees bias here :rage:
You’re on to something here. This week‘s top 10 has only the one highlight from our game - Dusty’s junk time fend off goal. You would’ve thought JVRs mark/entire past quarter more than qualifies
 
You’re on to something here. This week‘s top 10 has only the one highlight from our game - Dusty’s junk time fend off goal. You would’ve thought JVRs mark/entire past quarter more than qualifies
I'd have JVRs mark ahead Danihers and Bonts within context of the game too.


Not a single Melbourne moment in the 10 all year, I'm convinced it's a conspiracy and the AFL wants us to fail, there's no other explanation grrr
 
I'd have JVRs mark ahead Danihers and Bonts within context of the game too.


Not a single Melbourne moment in the 10 all year, I'm convinced it's a conspiracy and the AFL wants us to fail, there's no other explanation grrr

Just quietly, we didn't feature at all in round 7 either :mad::mad:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Oppo Camp The Loony Bin - Lead Sponsor of Crazy Topkent's Alternate Adventures

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top