List Mgmt. The OFFICIAL 2013 Trade/Free Agency Targets Thread

[Artaxx]

Dunno if this is directed at me or not, but I won't state my source as he is closely linked to our recruitment And list management team. If you go through everything I've posted most of it over the last 3-4 years has been pretty accurate.

I call rubbish but if it's true do you reckon its a good idea to post this information on the internet?

 

[roos_fanatic08]

I call rubbish but if it's true do you reckon its a good idea to post this information on the internet?

It's all pretty common knowledge on the inside. Pretty much all clubs know what's going on and who is on the table. I don't talk about anything that could harm oour trading or recruitment.

 

[Mordecai]

-dal wants to come to the roos. Roos want him as a free agent. Saints saying They won't void his final year contract.
We offered Adams and our third. They declined. We offered wright and our third they declined. They want Bastinac and our second or they wanted us to find a pick inside the top 15. Pelchan pushing all this junk.

Are you telling me Damien Barrett and Terry Wallet were lying to me on Trade Radio when they said pick 26 for Dal Santo would get the deal done?

 

[scooby1279]

No they aren't. Tell me why would you want to pay out their contracts when north are $2 million in debt?
Oh and DarkPhoenix pull your head in. I've seen what you post up and you're worse than me.

No im not going to explain to you how it all works. Cannot teach someone who has no common sense. Do u know for a fact they aren't on table? If not then maybe u need to sit back and observe this forum. Zip

 

[roos_fanatic08]

Are you telling me Damien Barrett and Terry Wallet were lying to me on Trade Radio when they said pick 26 for Dal Santo would get the deal done?

Just about everything that comes out of their mouths is rubbish.

 

[dus]

I call rubbish but if it's true do you reckon its a good idea to post this information on the internet?

Poor form.

 

[Luke72]

Well, at least you're not alone.

View attachment 33022

Edit: That's not mine.

Yes it is, and you're going to have to take care of it

 

[Star]

 

[Rooboy 96]

Wright and Adams are tradeable end of story!

anyone is tradeable for the right deal and all are untouchable for the wrong deal. but yeah carry on.

 

[Rooboy 96]

Absolutely. People on this board seem to think that only fringe players should be put up for trade, but the reality now is that if we want to improve your list we may have to move on players in our best 22 to do so.

or we could do the hard way and improve through training and hardwork. just a thought

 

[Rooboy 96]

Was just reading another board and one bloke mentioned that a player can't be traded if he signed that year. Is that true? That would mean we couldn't trade Wright, as we signed him this year. Seems stupid by the club if it is, so I highly doubt it is.

pretty sure that is correct, it is to stop contracting a player just to have the power in trading him. I think the AFLPA fought for this.

 

[the smith show]

Was just reading another board and one bloke mentioned that a player can't be traded if he signed that year. Is that true? That would mean we couldn't trade Wright, as we signed him this year. Seems stupid by the club if it is, so I highly doubt it is.

That rule was changed 2 or 3 years ago.

 

[SnowRoo]

Get the feeling its going to be a long slow week here.

No way will North change their stance of wanting NDS as a FA only until after the end of the FA period on Friday.

If the Saints really don't want to let him go as a FA they get to prove it, no need for North to blink first. We still have an entire week to consider trades after the StKilda compo pick has flown away from them as an option.

If its going to happen my tip is Friday afternoon just before FA window closes.

 

[G0ther00s]

Seems like it. Had a look through the Collective Bargaining Agreement and couldn't find anything about it.

There's been talks of trading Bootsma who just signed a deal this year so I'm sure there's no rule against it.

 

[Event Horizon]

That rule was changed 2 or 3 years ago.

It may have been, but it doesn't remove the question, why did we feel the need to re-sign Wright during the season.

 

[Only Forwards]

Enough of the discussion about contracted players.

HMac was contracted when we traded him last year ergo contracted players can be traded. Any further comments on this will be deleted.

 

[Harris 10]

Was just reading another board and one bloke mentioned that a player can't be traded if he signed that year. Is that true? That would mean we couldn't trade Wright, as we signed him this year. Seems stupid by the club if it is, so I highly doubt it is.

If the player consents to it they can be traded.

 

[Wells Now Williams Fan]

Enough of the discussion about contracted players.

HMac was contracted when we traded him last year ergo contracted players can be traded. Any further comments on this will be deleted.

Does this mean I can't talk about the diseases some players contracted after banging Kim Duthie???

Or is that a different player contract and ok?

 

[Harris 10]

Thanks or pointing out the obvious mate, appreciate it.

P.S. I don't think you understood what I was asking.

I understand exactly what your saying and a player can sign a deal tomorrow and be traded on Tuesday if he agrees to it.

Hopefully that answers your question for you.

 

[scooby1279]

In the next fortnight - as the AFL trade window closes - Vince will wait for any of Melbourne, North Melbourne and Essendon to offer him a deal that will challenge his boyhood dream of being a Crow for life.

Each of the Victorian-based clubs could offer Vince, 28, financial security with a long-term contract that is unlikely to be matched at Adelaide.

 

[Ahern2Boof]

What's the story with Tom Bugg?

 

[Harris 10]

In the next fortnight - as the AFL trade window closes - Vince will wait for any of Melbourne, North Melbourne and Essendon to offer him a deal that will challenge his boyhood dream of being a Crow for life.

Each of the Victorian-based clubs could offer Vince, 28, financial security with a long-term contract that is unlikely to be matched at Adelaide.

Interesting story this one on the news limited sites, I'd do 26 for Vince.

 

[JRoo]

What's the story with Tom Bugg?

Who knows hey!

 

[Flawed Genius]

Interesting story this one on the news limited sites, I'd do 26 for Vince.

Don't reckon the Crows would.

 

[Black Diamond]

Vince is too flaky and inconsistent.