Because we gave him a what, 6 year contract?Why wouldn't you sign him till 33?
You think it's appropriate to give him 8 for no reason?
WCE aren't Melbourne/Bulldogs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Because we gave him a what, 6 year contract?Why wouldn't you sign him till 33?
Because we gave him a what, 6 year contract?
You think it's appropriate to give him 8 for no reason?
WCE aren't Melbourne/Bulldogs.
Because we gave him a what, 6 year contract?
You think it's appropriate to give him 8 for no reason?
WCE aren't Melbourne/Bulldogs.
8 is always too long for any player. Ridiculous to offer a contract that big.I don't understand. Breust has been at Hawthorn for 16 seasons, should we not have extended his contract to 17 seasons?
You're saying 8 is too long?
Either way, we can always go after Harley Reid instead. Good mates with Watson.
It sounds like WC doesn't believe his body is sufficiently reliable to make it for the additional years. This on top of WC backing out of the handshake agreement made last off-season to renegotiate his contract in line with market rates.
It seems as if WC has done the dirty on Tom and are now using him as trade bait and waiting for a sucker to bite.
8 is always too long for any player. Ridiculous to offer a contract that big.
Reid's better mates with Jason Gilbee and Campbell Chesser, who are both at WCE.
Love it how Vic supporters always say "We'll go get Harley then."
It ain't happening.
Yes, I believe an 8 year contract is moronic.Whatever you believe
It would also be bad to pay ridiculous overs.It would be really bad of Hawks to whisper and chase a contracted player, and then back out. I doubt the Hawks recruiting team would do that. They will pay what they need to.
why not 3 first rounders and will day + nick watson + partridge in a pear treeIts pick 13 and will probably be pick 15 or 16
Its clearly not enough not even close .
West coast have already said they want 2 first rounders .
What goes back with barrass is another story
Yes, I believe an 8 year contract is moronic.
Just look at Oliver and Petracca, for instance.
As what?Omg, you've just outed yourself
As what?
I don't even know what dumb point you're attempting to make.
Yes.You said:
Yes, I believe an 8 year contract is moronic.
Just look at Oliver and Petracca, for instance.
It sounds like WC doesn't believe his body is sufficiently reliable to make it for the additional years. This on top of WC backing out of the handshake agreement made last off-season to renegotiate his contract in line with market rates.
It seems as if WC has done the dirty on Tom and are now using him as trade bait and waiting for a sucker to bite.
I'll say it a second time, since you've completely avoided the question, as expected.
Explain to me how WCE have 'mismanaged' his injury.
That’s still overpaying. If we happen to be desperate doesn’t make it any less of an overpay.That's your limit, doesn't mean that's your list management team's limit, especially if they've been told by Mitchell to go get Barrass.
They may not consider it an overpay at all, if it fills a need they consider big enough.
Again, it all depends on what the list management teams considers 'overpaying'.That’s still overpaying. If we happen to be desperate doesn’t make it any less of an overpay.
Just depends on hard limits and I hope our list team has learnt and doesn’t go silly. We’ve got a different man in charge compared to our previous trade failings.
Huh? I’ve already said I’d go to 13 and future 2nd which I already consider a fair bit over but can understand doing it due to our list demographic.Barrass will cost your first rounder and some decent change it doesn’t get done for short of 13 plus 30 or your 2025RD pick
I’d dare say that’s more to do with hard limits and willingness to overpay in order to secure their man.Again, it all depends on what the list management teams considers 'overpaying'.
I daresay they'll have a different opinion to posters on Bigfooty.
Depends what they have in mind.I’d dare say that’s more to do with hard limits and willingness to overpay in order to secure their man.
I’d be seriously concerned with our list management if they didn’t consider 2 firsts way overs.
They might have a slightly different view I can’t imagine it would be anything as crazy as that.
How dumbs that take..It sounds like WC doesn't believe his body is sufficiently reliable to make it for the additional years. This on top of WC backing out of the handshake agreement made last off-season to renegotiate his contract in line with market rates.
It seems as if WC has done the dirty on Tom and are now using him as trade bait and waiting for a sucker to bite.